If your filter script parses the F-PROT virus report and finds an
embedded virus, it can modify the xmail message header simply and not
propagate the virus further so no SA daemon gets bothered later.
The thingy is that I want to reject MSGs at SMTP level, but that must be
(REAL-)user-based
-Message d'origine-
De : Tracy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoy=E9 : jeudi 29 avril 2004 01:24
=C0 : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : [xmail] Re: Is there a limit to the length of a=20
response string=20
=20
=20
At 18:58 4/28/2004, you wrote:
Is there a limit to the number of
|Python and Java both work very well on both platforms.
I don't have experience with Python. But I *have* experience with Java. Bad.
Multi-platformness is very nice for academic games or marketing buzz, but
not for real deployment.
Please, write applications in way what is native for the
Norman virus control (www.norman.com) is very good
and
it was possible to download Linux demo version for
free
(not shure that it is yet available).
Norman virus control understand @@FILE and mail
format,
returns exit codes we need for XMail, unpack any
kind of
archives attached to the mail zip,
Precisely. No java please!
..NET is ok for me. I don't mind perl for a reporting application.
=20
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Michal Altair Valasek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Verzonden: donderdag 29 april 2004 9:36
Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Onderwerp: [xmail] Re: Xmail reports --
At 02:48 4/29/2004, you wrote:
Why not simply send a :
450 - Mail blocked. See =
http://www.arisiasoft.com/Mailblock/blocked.aspx
for reasons.
Short, is not it ?
For four reasons:
1) These messages are intended to be read by the individual message
senders, who certainly have no realistic
I am a die hard C++ programmer :) But this project would take a lot more
time and require a large number of extra libraries if I were to use C++.
Think XML, Database access, possible UI. All of this is part of the
..NET/Mono core library. Is installing .NET/CLI that big of a deal? Most
windows
Installing Mono on Gentoo Linux takes one command: emerge mono. They
also have Fedora, Red Hat, Debian and SUSE packages on their site. So
while no, Mono doesn't come standard on Linux boxes, I don't think it's
that big of a deal.
-Mark
On Thu, 2004-04-29 at 09:35, Shawn Anderson wrote:
I am a
There is also DotGNU at http://www.dotgnu.org, which looks real good. I have
not seen or heard a hard line comparison though.
Thanks,
Chuck Frolick
ArgoLink.net
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mark Mealman
Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2004
On Thu, 2004-04-29 at 09:35, Shawn Anderson wrote:
...NET/Mono core library. Is installing .NET/CLI that big of a deal? Most
windows machines already have it.
most developer new machines at any rate. If you were to count all
windows machines out there, I'd be very surprised to learn that
On Thursday 29 April 2004 05:26 am, Shawn Anderson wrote:
With how hard MS is pushing it out via there Update Services :) Who knows,
but it sure makes development faster..
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of William Denniss
Sent:
I am curious, why do you say it is a Windows only solution? Mono and GnuDot
are very well along in development and very stable. They run on almost as
many platforms as Perl.
And while I do know Perl and have written many many applications in it, I am
not really fond of the syntax, the debugger,
Beau E. Cox wrote:
So I guess this has become a Windows-only project. Well good luck.
Have you any idea how many Unix/Linux servers are out there?
I don't see your adversion to Perl which has everthing in place,
via CPAN, to accomplish all your needs: portable, avaiable modules
for almost any
You will find people that would argue that Linux is slower, less stable, and
less secure than the BSD's, and in my experiences, it is, but more apps
support Linux natively than BSD, and most hosting control panels only
support certain versions of Linux (RedHat), so the prejudice is no different
On Thu, 29 Apr 2004, Beau E. Cox wrote:
So I guess this has become a Windows-only project. Well good luck.
Have you any idea how many Unix/Linux servers are out there?
I don't see your adversion to Perl which has everthing in place,
via CPAN, to accomplish all your needs: portable, avaiable
Some people just don't like working with Perl and I don't blame them,
it's an arcane language if you're coming from a C/C++ background. I used
to work a lot with Perl but moved onto Python because it's much easier
to work with, though even it has its own unique syntax.
I hate MS as much as the
Does anyone have a script I can run from a crontab on FreeBSD that will
stop Xmail then start it after the service has stopped?
Thanks,
- ken
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in
Hi,
Make sure XMAIL_ROOT and path to SH is valid
#!/bin/sh
#
XMAIL_ROOT=/apps/MailRoot
echo Killing XMail
kill `ps -aux | grep XMail | grep -v grep | awk '{print $2}'`
wait
echo Starting XMail
$XMAIL_ROOT/bin/xmail start
exit 0
Hope this helps
Fred
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
Thanks, Fred!
That looks like it does exactly what I need.
Thanks,
- Ken
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Fred
Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2004 1:13 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [xmail] Re: Script to shut down then start xmail
Hi,
My Pleasure Ken, but make sure the wait command is on a new line, exit 0
should be on a new line too.
fred
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ken Larkman
Sent: 29 avril, 2004 15:23
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [xmail] Re: Script to shut
Sorry,
make sure the wait command is on a new line, echo Starting XMail
should be on a new line too.
fred
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Fred
Sent: 29 avril, 2004 15:27
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [xmail] Re: Script to shut down
I agree it's a big task to write a portable and reliable report app
for xmail logs.
To satisfy everyone I would just use C and mysql.
I started something similar on windows a few years ago because
my company had to calculate bandwidth usage etc ... ,
you can find it here
.. just realized, wrong link.
http://www.henry.it/xmail/myxstats.htm
Ciao
Dario
- Original Message -
From: Dario Jakopec [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2004 9:37 PM
Subject: [xmail] Re: Xmail reports -- anyone have a wish list?
I agree it's a
Hi,
|There are people who run a Windows 2003 box as just an XMail server
|-- to me that doesn't make sense, since with the same hardware, you
|could load Redhat from disk, install Xmail from RPMs and have just
|about the same ease of install and management as Windows 2003 (and,
|if I remember
Hi,
Shouldn't i be able to send an email out like this:
echo To:[EMAIL PROTECTED] echo Subject:Test message echo this is
a test | sendmail -t -froot
What am I missing here???
Ben
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello Michal,
Thursday, April 29, 2004 you wrote:
MAV Just now I am fighting with Perl on Windows to run SpamAssassin. The
MAV performance is HORRIBLE. Maybe its my fault, but I can't see it. In native
MAV ..NET application I know where the bottlenecks are. In Perl I don't know and
MAV no chance
I agree, perl won't perform well on windows in many cases, and you just
pointed
out the real problem. Don't try to adapt things to a different os, make them
as natural possible...
I discharged running spamassassin on windows (that perl is for *nix), that's
why I
ported a spamc to windows, so I
Just in case anyone was having the same problem...
You can get hylafax and xmail to play together by editing the last line
in the [hylfax installation]/bin/notify.
From this:
) | 21 $SENDMAIL -t -ffax -oi
To this:
) | 21 $SENDMAIL -t -ffax
This is assuming you have the sendmail scripts
Hi, maybe someone already written a script that does what i need, if yes
please post the url. I need something that will monitor all the mailboxes of
my xmail server to make sure the sum of all messages in each mbox isn't
bigger than specified in user.tab. If bigger, the script would send an
Check out:
http://xmail.eye-catcher.com/Community/Downloads/General/60.aspx
Shawn
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Fred
Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2004 4:28 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [xmail] XMail quota monitor
Hi, maybe someone
Thanks for the reply Shawn, this is exactly what i need but unfortunately
the script does not work :(
I tried it on a redhat-8.0 box and on a FreeBSD-4.8 box, both are running
perl-5.8.0.
Do you know what is going on here:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] bin]# ./xmailquotamonitor.pl
Davide,
Would it be possible to add a way to skip the CustomMapsList look up based
on domains as well as IP address? I have a few clients that are on dynamic
ip address for there outgoing mail server (business clients not end users)
and it would be great if I could just add there exact domain.
My time for a dumb question:
I want all messages sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent to my postmaster
account. I've set up the sendmail that comes with Xmail and it seems to
work fine. However, I seem to be missing out on how to configure Xmail
to accept submissions to root or [EMAIL PROTECTED].
Any
On Thu, 29 Apr 2004, Benny wrote:
Just in case anyone was having the same problem...
You can get hylafax and xmail to play together by editing the last line
in the [hylfax installation]/bin/notify.
From this:
) | 21 $SENDMAIL -t -ffax -oi
To this:
) | 21 $SENDMAIL -t -ffax
This
On Thu, 29 Apr 2004, Benny wrote:
Hi,
Shouldn't i be able to send an email out like this:
echo To:[EMAIL PROTECTED] echo Subject:Test message echo this is
a test | sendmail -t -froot
What am I missing here???
What's the error that you get?
- Davide
-
To unsubscribe from this
Hmm, I only tested it on perl-5.6.x
When I get a chance I'll try to test it on v5.8.
Shawn
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Fred
Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2004 5:02 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [xmail] Re: XMail quota monitor
- option 1:
fix line 1 of the script:
#/usr/bin/perl
becomes
#!/usr/bin/perl
- option 2:
run $ perl xmailquotamonitor.pl
Am Do, 2004-04-29 um 23.01 schrieb Fred:
Thanks for the reply Shawn, this is exactly what i need but unfortunately
the script does not work :(
I tried it
On Thu, 29 Apr 2004, Ken Larkman wrote:
My time for a dumb question:
I want all messages sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent to my postmaster
account. I've set up the sendmail that comes with Xmail and it seems to
work fine. However, I seem to be missing out on how to configure Xmail
to accept
Looks like that perl script was originally written for Windows - you're
going to need to change the first line:
#/usr/bin/perl
to
#!/usr/bin/perl
(note missing bang) - and verify the path to your copy of perl. You also
need to go through the script and update paths in the User
On Thu, 29 Apr 2004, Shawn Anderson wrote:
Davide,
Would it be possible to add a way to skip the CustomMapsList look up based
on domains as well as IP address? I have a few clients that are on dynamic
ip address for there outgoing mail server (business clients not end users)
and it would
That doesn't help for emails coming from other SMTP servers, only people
connecting directly to my server.
Shawn
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Davide Libenzi
Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2004 5:49 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
I agree with every point Davide.
I would just add that well implemented multiple spamd hosts is an efficient
solution used on very large mail servers.
I think the major problem is when you have it all done by one server (mail,
spamc/spamd, web, dns ).
Ciao
Dario
Look SA is slow everywhere,
42 matches
Mail list logo
