Sorry didn't realize that due to the fact I filter everything (except AV
scanning ) with filter.post-data.tab.
-- Chris L. Franklin --
Davide Libenzi wrote:
>On Mon, 13 Sep 2004, Chris L. Franklin wrote:
>
>
>
>>how about a pop syn filter tab file ?
>>
>>
>
>POP# sync'd messages are alrea
On Mon, 13 Sep 2004, Chris L. Franklin wrote:
> how about a pop syn filter tab file ?
POP# sync'd messages are already injected in the spool, so they are
already subject to either in or out filters.
- Davide
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a
how about a pop syn filter tab file ?
-- Chris L. Franklin --
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 13 Sep 2004, [windows-1255] =F0=E5=F8 =E3=E0=E5=E3 wrote:
> MUST? No no one said that, David.
> No one can force you.
>=20
> You can either implement it or not. What's the catch here? Why not to do
> it?
Ok, you said:
1) "there's a clear ESMTP protocol to address exactly this problem"
2
Anyone know of a really good way of running a battery of test against a
server that is setup with spf? So as to make sure it is working properly.
Also I ready that by using SPF it breaks forwarding. Is that true and why,
and is there a way to work around it?
- Original Message -
From: "
Davide Libenzi wrote:
>
>
>A pre-data filter can work just fine here.
>
>
>
Yes, but being able to set something like "mail-auth 0.0.0.0:587,..."
in server.tab would be better ;)
-John
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PRO
About SPF, and Sender ID and expecially then the future rfc common to =
spf
and sender id will be approved (soon) I think that major mail server
developpers will quickly integrate these features in they products.
So I think it will be a good think to see next xmail version include =
such
features
