Hello Davide,
a dumb SPAMmer sent me a mail, which was received by a Xmail server and =
then
forwarded to an Exchange-Box - that rejected the message because of an
invalid MAIL FROM:
Here's the error message (parts of)
[00] XMail bounce: [EMAIL PROTECTED];Error=3D[501 5.5.4 =
Invalid
Address]
SW4gdGhpcyBjYXNlIEV4Y2hhbmdlLCB5b3UgY2FuJ3QgaGF2ZSBhICIuIiByaWdodCBuZXh0IHRv
IHRoZSBAIHNpZ24uDQoNCi0tIENocmlzIEwuIEZyYW5rbGluIC0tDQoNCi0tLS0tIE9yaWdpbmFs
IE1lc3NhZ2UgLS0tLS0gDQpGcm9tOiAiTWFudWVsIE1hcnRpbiIgPG1hcnRpbkBmZXJiZXItc29m
What's a clear response ;-)
Thanks Chris ;-)
What is the new crypto algo used here ? Didn't pass any crack here ... =
;-)
Francis
-Message d'origine-
De : Chris L. Franklin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoy=E9 : jeudi 17 f=E9vrier 2005 14:30
=C0 : xmail@xmailserver.org
Objet : [xmail]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Thursday, February 17, 2005
5:06 PM:
What's a clear response ;-)
Thanks Chris ;-)
=20
What is the new crypto algo used here ? Didn't pass any crack
here ... =3D
;-)
It's the new leet base64 crypt algo. They said no one will ever be able
to crack it ;-)
-
To
I have the same problem (?) here ..
But for my point of view, this is not really a problem as 99,99% of the =
bad
emails syntaxes was really bad syntax errors in the mail address ...
The real question is : What Smtp RFC's say about email addresses syntax
check and to define if xmail or exchange
Are you sure ?
Is not it the 'next generation' subspatial-base64 ?
or the new semi-bits 64.5 (like semi-conductors) crypto algo ... ;-)
I will try to divide by 2 the cpu leads with the cutter ...
See you later ...
:-)
-Message d'origine-
De : S=F6nke Ruempler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello Francis,=20
I have the same problem (?) here ..
But for my point of view, this is not really a problem as=20
99,99% of the =3D
bad
emails syntaxes was really bad syntax errors in the mail address ...
usually Xmail rejects them outright, so Exchange may not receive them, =
but I
usually Xmail rejects them outright, so Exchange may not=20
receive them, =3D
but I
already had another Syntax Error.=20
that should have been another type of syntax error
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005, CLEMENT Francis wrote:
I have the same problem (?) here ..
But for my point of view, this is not really a problem as 99,99% of the =
bad
emails syntaxes was really bad syntax errors in the mail address ...
The real question is : What Smtp RFC's say about email
