[xmail] Re: Problems with hotmail.com

2005-03-13 Thread Tracy
At 00:09 3/13/2005, Kroll, David wrote: This is a Win2003 DNS issue. Some mailservers behind firewalls which do not allow transfer of UDP packets larger than 512 bytes may not be able to return the MX record If your firewall restricts UDP packet transfers though, you may want to verify that it

[xmail] R: Re: Problems with hotmail.com

2005-03-13 Thread Dario
If that's the right issue a simple search for hotmail.com file in your /mailroot/dnscache/mx/ dir should reveal the truth mine contains the following: 3600 5:mx1.hotmail.com.,5:mx2.hotmail.com.,5:mx3.hotmail.com.,5:mx4.hotmail.com. Dario -Messaggio originale- Da: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[xmail] R: Re: Problems with hotmail.com

2005-03-13 Thread Dario
That should be in RFC 2671... Dario -Messaggio originale- Da: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Per conto di Tracy Inviato: domenica 13 marzo 2005 14.43 A: xmail@xmailserver.org Oggetto: [xmail] Re: Problems with hotmail.com At 00:09 3/13/2005, Kroll, David wrote: This is a

[xmail] Re: R: Re: Problems with hotmail.com

2005-03-13 Thread Kroll, David
I had been seeing the same reports since I upgraded to win2003 on several customers systems and SPF extended records became more commonplace. This solved things for me. http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;828263 http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1035.html According to RFC 2821,

[xmail] Re: R: Re: Problems with hotmail.com

2005-03-13 Thread Kroll, David
With Extension Mechanisms for DNS (EDNS0) as defined in RFC 2671, Extension Mechanisms for DNS (EDNS0), DNS requestors can advertise UDP packet size and transfer packets larger than 512 bytes. By default, some firewalls have security features turned on that block UDP packets that are larger than

[xmail] Re: R: Re: Problems with hotmail.com

2005-03-13 Thread Tracy
According to my reading of RFC2671,those are optional extensions and do not override the original specification in RFC1035. While it is certainly possible for a client to support them (and perhaps even an expected behavior in today's Internet), I don't see anything there that indicates that