Resending because I didn't get an echo - not sure if it made it to the
list...
Tracy wrote:
> Soenke Ruempler wrote:
>> Hi Tracy,
>>
>> On 27.10.2006 14:00, Tracy wrote:
>>
>>> I'm running XMail 1.20 (I know, not the current version) on Windows
>>> 2000 Server (SP4). I have two filters that run
>From http://xmailserver.org/Readme.html#server_tab_variables
[AllowNullSender]
Enable null sender ('MAIL FROM:<>') messages to be accepted by XMail.
_
Kirk Friggstad - Sysadmin / Database Admin
IRON Solutions: 109 Saskat
Download XQM (XMail Queue Manager) from www.marketmix.com to examine the
spool directories.
There is also this that may be causing your problems...
*
This is a small&simple post-data filter to fix the "Zero byte inside the
message" and the "No newline at the end of message" prob
I'm having problems sending messages to some servers that do reverse check
because XMail demands email addresses enclosure with <>.
Is there a way to inhibit this need?
Take a look on this chat:
helo220-host1.northweb.com.br ESMTP Exim 4.52 #1 Fri, 27 Oct 2006
18:22:29 -0200
220-We do not autho
On 27.10.2006 21:24, Davide Libenzi wrote:
> This stuff can be analyzed only in presence of detailed data. Without
> that, nothing can be done.
Yes, Sir ;P
--
Best regards / Mit freundlichen Gruessen
Sönke Ruempler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.ruempler.eu/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: s
On Fri, 27 Oct 2006, Soenke Ruempler wrote:
> On 27.10.2006 14:00, Tracy wrote:
>
> > I'm running XMail 1.20 (I know, not the current version) on Windows 2000
> > Server (SP4). I have two filters that run (one from pre-data - spam
> > check, one from post-data - virus scan).
> >
> > For the l
On Fri, 27 Oct 2006, Matic wrote:
> yeah, I thought of that, but this would be quite an overhead compared to
> the check that actually has to be done before message is delivered
That, BTW, would require extra bits to verify that the mbox-full message
has been already dropped inside.
- David
yeah, I thought of that, but this would be quite an overhead compared to
the check that actually has to be done before message is delivered
Matic
Davide Libenzi pravi:
> On Fri, 27 Oct 2006, Matic wrote:
>
>
>> Is it possible to let users know when their mailbox is full - could
>> Xmail del
On Fri, 27 Oct 2006, Matic wrote:
> Is it possible to let users know when their mailbox is full - could
> Xmail deliver one short message to the users mbox when it responds "mail
> box full".
> People manage to fill their mbox within 7 days with all sort of huge
> attachments.
cron job, for e
Hello,
I have xmail set up on a linux box and I'm using spamassassin with Don
Drake's filter to mark incoming messages as spam. Everything works
great but what I would like to do is to put all incoming spam into a
separate mailbox (e.g. spambox-at-mydomain.nl). How can this be done?
I tried rewri
Hi Tracy,
On 27.10.2006 14:00, Tracy wrote:
> I'm running XMail 1.20 (I know, not the current version) on Windows 2000
> Server (SP4). I have two filters that run (one from pre-data - spam
> check, one from post-data - virus scan).
>
> For the last week, I've been noticing that mail delivery
Greetings,
I'm running XMail 1.20 (I know, not the current version) on Windows 2000
Server (SP4). I have two filters that run (one from pre-data - spam
check, one from post-data - virus scan).
For the last week, I've been noticing that mail delivery is running
about 4 - 6 hours later than mai
Hi!
Is it possible to let users know when their mailbox is full - could
Xmail deliver one short message to the users mbox when it responds "mail
box full".
People manage to fill their mbox within 7 days with all sort of huge
attachments.
Matic
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the li
13 matches
Mail list logo
