On Fri, 27 Apr 2007, Edinilson - ATINET wrote:
> Davide, which configurations in server.tab do you want to test 1.25pre09 on
> Windows 2000 (Xmail Win32)?
>
> I was stucked here for a while and now I could upgrade and test this newer
> version on a very busy server (and report you problems).
On Fri, 27 Apr 2007, CLEMENT Francis wrote:
> Davide wrote a perl filter for spf (smtp receiver side), but :
No it did not. I also stopped using it. For me RBLs+GLST do the job and
are less error prone.
- Davide
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body o
On Fri, 27 Apr 2007, CLEMENT Francis wrote:
> Hello Davide and list :
>
> I upgraded to 1.25pre09 from 1.24 to test new 'dns' resolver in xmail.
>
> Here is a report from xmail 1.25pre09 that I never get with 1.24 for the
> same destination domain :
> ===
> [<00>] XMail bounc
Thanks, I came across it after I posted the email. I will try it out
when employees leave for the day=20
Again thanks. =20
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Rob Arends
Sent: Friday, April 27, 2007 10:36 AM
To: xmail@xmailserver.org
Subject:
See here:
http://www.xmailserver.org/Readme.html#smtp_client_authentication
Either set up server.tab "defaultsmtpgateway"[tab]"mail.isp.com"
Or add to smtpgw.tab "*"[tab]"mail.isp.com"
Then in $mailroot/userauth/smtp create file "mail.isp.com.tab"
In it add "LOGIN"[tab]"username"[tab]"password"
See section "SMTP CLIENT AUTHENTICATION" in xmail doc to do outgoing =
AUTH
As noted :
If your 'relayer' host server have the name
thegoodrelayserver.somegoodisp.com then added a file named
'thegoodrelayserver.somegoodisp.com.tab' in /userauth/smtp
subdirectory and in this file set the line(s) t
Davide, which configurations in server.tab do you want to test 1.25pre09 on
Windows 2000 (Xmail Win32)?
I was stucked here for a while and now I could upgrade and test this newer
version on a very busy server (and report you problems).
Edinilson
You are right! Thanks for you help..
Regards
Edinilson
-
ATINET-Professional Web Hosting
Tel Voz: (0xx11) 4412-0876
http://www.atinet.com.br
- Original Message -
From: "Rob Arends" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Cc: "'Edinilson - ATINET
Thanks, it appears I can relay but must logon, presenting a different
setup up problem. How to do this in xmail?=20
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Rob Arends
Sent: Friday, April 27, 2007 10:01 AM
To: xmail@xmailserver.org
Subject: [xmail]
J.B.,
The ONLY time I've had an error re: failed to load (etc.) is when I've
missed the supporting library (required >=1.24)
My usual diagnosis, is to google the error text.
What do you get when you do this?
Rob :-)
_
Note To Self: Remember to pu
I have identified a potential solution to my issue of email being
blocked because of Dynamic DNS but having some difficulty understanding
how to implement it in xmail
I can route all outgoing traffic through another mail server (relay),
however it requires me to authenticate (ID and Password). Ca
First thing to find out is if your ISP will allow you to relay for free.
Second thing is, if you use SPF records, then include your ISP outgoing IP
address(es) in your SPF record.
Then if at least #1, then relay via ISP.
Those MTAs that deny mail from dynamic IPs, must not deny from the MTAs of
th
Sorry but I did read the manual. The DLLs are properly placed and the
environment variables as well as registry entries appear correct. I
suspected a SSL issue but I followed the instructions. Is there a step
to be assumed but unwritten? Am I missing a SERVER.TAB entry that is
new??
-Origi
> Does anyone used successfully spf/srs on xmail ?
Yes, ASSP does SPF/SRS (with second XMail instance
for the outbound traffic).
Przemek
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line "help" in the
> Does anyone used successfully spf/srs on xmail ?
Yes, ASSP does SPF/SRS.
Przemek Czerkas
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The cause of not getting email from xmail-list after upgrade to 1.24 =
will be
that x35.xmailserver.org is attempting to negotiate TLS, when you do =
not
have TLS correctly configured - either fully off, or with correct
certificates.
Please search the archives to find the answers either way.
http
Hello Davide and list :
I upgraded to 1.25pre09 from 1.24 to test new 'dns' resolver in xmail.
Here is a report from xmail 1.25pre09 that I never get with 1.24 for the
same destination domain :
===
[<00>] XMail bounce: [EMAIL PROTECTED];Error=[Recipient domain
"haworth.com" do
That's exactly my concern. I could be paying 3 cents per recipient to
have the mail relayed, just to have it blocked anyway since the
recipient's server does not allow relayed traffic from any source.=20
I am looking for a better solution.
JB Edmonds
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROT
>-Message d'origine-
>De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Bart Mortelmans
>Envoy=E9 : vendredi 27 avril 2007 11:17
>=C0 : xmail@xmailserver.org
>Objet : [xmail] Re: Dynamic DNS / Don't use SPF
>
>
>Thanks for clearing that out!
>
>Then my next question would be: is
Thanks for clearing that out!
Then my next question would be: is there something that would implement
SRS in forwarding within XMailserver?
Sincerely,
Bart Mortelmans
CLEMENT Francis wrote:
>> -Message d'origine-
>> De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Bart M
>-Message d'origine-
>De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Bart Mortelmans
>Envoy=E9 : vendredi 27 avril 2007 09:41
>=C0 : xmail@xmailserver.org
>Objet : [xmail] Re: Dynamic DNS / Don't use SPF
>
>
>SRS has a couple of problems, which make me assume that it's not goi
SRS has a couple of problems, which make me assume that it's not going
to really get anywhere:
1) If you implement SPF, then you have to rely on the fact that
forwarding services of your recipients implemented SRS.
2) The from address gets mocked up. Making it not very "user readable".
3) The fr
This 'forwarding' issue is resolved with 'SRS' (Sender Rewriting =
Scheme)
that complements SPF.
In fact SPF allways need SRS :)
(except on final smtp servers that you are sure it's not possible to =
forward
to foreign servers that are not controlled by you)
The couple SPF + SRS can be called 'new'
23 matches
Mail list logo