On Sat, 6 Sep 2008, Rob Arends wrote:
> Davide,
>
> If I wanted to use the default unix storage format - is it possible to
> convert the existing windows format mail boxes?
>
> I could write little bit of Perl if the conversion was relatively simple.
Yep:
for_each_domain
Davide,
If I wanted to use the default unix storage format - is it possible to
convert the existing windows format mail boxes?
I could write little bit of Perl if the conversion was relatively simple.
Rob :-)
_
It might look like I'm doing noth
On Sat, 6 Sep 2008, Rob Arends wrote:
>
> So this will make my planned IMAP4 implementation easier.
>
> I'm running on w32 and planning to go Linux (mail is my only legacy W32
> platform) and then implement a native Linux IMAP4 server, but I remember
> lots of work arounds for the CRLF/LF issue,
On Fri, 5 Sep 2008, Rob Arends wrote:
> On Thursday, September 04, 2008 4:22 AM, Davide Libenzi wrote:
>
> >On Wed, 3 Sep 2008, Rob Arends wrote:
>
> >> Davide, just out of curiosity.
> >>
> >> Regarding the LF on disk vs CRLF in the SMTP protocol:
> >>
> >> Could you have read the file and co
So this will make my planned IMAP4 implementation easier.
I'm running on w32 and planning to go Linux (mail is my only legacy W32
platform) and then implement a native Linux IMAP4 server, but I remember
lots of work arounds for the CRLF/LF issue, so I was not exited about the
idea of implementing
On Thursday, September 04, 2008 4:22 AM, Davide Libenzi wrote:
>On Wed, 3 Sep 2008, Rob Arends wrote:
>> Davide, just out of curiosity.
>>
>> Regarding the LF on disk vs CRLF in the SMTP protocol:
>>
>> Could you have read the file and converted LF->CRLF on the fly while
sending
>> the TCP data
