On Wed, 12 May 2004, Bill Healy wrote:
> You have an A record that points back to yourself
> bioenergy.com. 3580IN A 207.67.28.220
>
> Don't know why xmail is giving preference to the A record when an MX
> record exists. Interesting
> bioenergy.com. 3529IN
On Wed, 12 May 2004, John Kielkopf wrote:
> Getting a "Mail loop detected" on a domain we host on our DNS server,
> and on our web servers, be do not host the mail (MX record points to
> customers server).
>
> This only happens on mail being sent from our mail server. The
> destination domain
On Tue, 11 May 2004, [iso-8859-1] S=F6nke Ruempler wrote:
> > pls fetch pre3 from the server ...
>=20
> i did 3 times, nothing... who is stupid now? :P
Ok, maybe I need to update the server with a pre4 :-)
- Davide
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body
On Tue, 11 May 2004, [iso-8859-1] S=F6nke Ruempler wrote:
> > The only check that is performed is the one to verify that the
> > target=3D20 domain exist. Other check will be bogus since, with
> > wildcards, I want to=3D20 leave open the ability to have overlapping
> > aliases.
>=20
> I think it i
On Tue, 11 May 2004, [iso-8859-1] S=F6nke Ruempler wrote:
> > Grep SMTPSvr.cpp for "@@USERAUTH" ...
>=20
> Nothing ...
pls fetch pre3 from the server ...
- Davide
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help:
On Tue, 11 May 2004, [iso-8859-1] S=F6nke Ruempler wrote:
> Hi,
>=20
> Davide, in 1.19pre03 it's possible again to add a domain as real AND as
> aliasdomain. Afaik you added a check some time ago but now it's broken.
The only check that is performed is the one to verify that the target=20
domain
On Tue, 11 May 2004, [iso-8859-1] S=F6nke Ruempler wrote:
> > Ok, I added @@USERAUTH, @@REMOTEADDR and @@LOCALADDR
Grep SMTPSvr.cpp for "@@USERAUTH" ...
- Davide
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help:
On Fri, 7 May 2004, Christian Gross wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Davide, once the different changes have been integrated could you please
> tell me where I can download the sources again?
Can you pls make me a diff -Nu of your changes over 1.19-pre3?
> Next, I am currently installing Darwin on x86. Ev
On Fri, 7 May 2004, Harald Schneider wrote:
> Hi,
>
> let's resume .. these modification need to go into SysINcludeBSD.h:
> #include
>
> #include
>
> After this, compilation runs a while and finally stops with
>
> g++ -O2 -I. -D__UNIX__ -D__BSD__ -D__FREEBSD__ -DXMAIL_X86
> -D_REENTRANT
On Fri, 7 May 2004, Jaques Metz wrote:
> I've found the problem... the external server where the mail server
> syncronizes the messages doesn't allow more than 4 simultaneous connections
> from the same IP address. I don't know if XMail have a configuration that
> would syncronize messages from th
On Fri, 7 May 2004, Christian Gross wrote:
>
> The compile ran successfully, but the link returned with the error:
>
> g++: unrecognized option `-pthread'
> ld: can't locate file for: -lc_r
> make: *** [XMail] Error 1
> Process make exited with code 2
>
> I am in the process of investigating the
On Thu, 6 May 2004, Beau E. Cox wrote:
> On Thursday 06 May 2004 11:57 am, Davide Libenzi wrote:
> > On Thu, 6 May 2004, Beau E. Cox wrote:
> > > I'm really not trying to BS anyone. OK, I'll make a new filter:
> > > 'mod_xmail', that tcp's to
On Thu, 6 May 2004, Jaques Metz wrote:
> Hi.
> I'm having troubles with my xmail mail server. I've configured 15 user
> accounts, and these 15 account should syncronize messages from an
> external POP3 server. The problem is that only 4 accounts listed in
> pop3links.tab works fine, the others
On Thu, 6 May 2004, Beau E. Cox wrote:
> I'm really not trying to BS anyone. OK, I'll make a new filter:
> 'mod_xmail', that tcp's to a server 'mod_xmaild' which will
> implement my perl embedding. To use mod_xmail, simply change the
> filter's .tab from:
>
> "/where/ever/my_filter.pl"[TAB]"@@WHA
On Thu, 6 May 2004, Christian Gross wrote:
> Toby Reiter wrote:
>
> >>On Thu, 6 May 2004, Toby Reiter wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >% man 2 poll
> >No entry for poll in section 2 of the manual
> >
> >
> >
> poll.h exists in /usr/include (I have Panther)
Ok, this is one. Are you trying on 1
On Thu, 6 May 2004, Toby Reiter wrote:
> >On Thu, 6 May 2004, Toby Reiter wrote:
> >
> >> >Does it have a gmake/gcc? Did you try a "make -f Makefile.bsd"?
> >>
> >> Davide,
> >> Just tried it myself and got:
> >>
> >> In file included from SysInclude.h:54,
> >>from BuffSock
On Thu, 6 May 2004, Toby Reiter wrote:
> >Does it have a gmake/gcc? Did you try a "make -f Makefile.bsd"?
>
> Davide,
> Just tried it myself and got:
>
> In file included from SysInclude.h:54,
> from BuffSock.cpp:24:
> SysIncludeBSD.h:35:22: sys/poll.h: No such file or director
On Thu, 6 May 2004, Christian Gross wrote:
> Hi
>
> I recently acquired an OSX box, and wanted to use XMail server.
> However, it does not seem to compile.
>
> So my questions are...
>
> 1) Is an OSX port planned at all?
> 2) Has it been attempted?
> 3) Can it be done?
Does it have a gmak
On Wed, 5 May 2004, Beau E. Cox wrote:
> > There's a better solution that does not involve tweaking the XMail source
> > code. You have one (or more) pre-loaded Perl interpreters running as
> > servers bound on certain TCP ports, and you have a very small binary
> > (cperl, written in C using sock
On Wed, 5 May 2004, Xmail wrote:
> This seems similar to another project I saw called SCOPEE that Thomas Loo
> was working on. Maybe you guys can collaborate and make each one better.
You've got me wrong. I'm not gonna do it ;) It was just an idea.
- Davide
-
To unsubscribe from this list:
On Wed, 5 May 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi -
>
> Last year I developed a library of c functions to embed the
> perl interpreter into c/c++ applications. After several successful
> deployments, I decided to try to 'embed' perl in the XMail server.
>
> It works! I have been running it on my
On Tue, 4 May 2004, John Kielkopf wrote:
> Davide Libenzi wrote:
>
> >Ok, I added @@USERAUTH, @@REMOTEADDR and @@LOCALADDR
> >
> Inside @@FILE, is RCPT TO:<...> resolved to the "real" address (if
> applicable)? If not, is there an easy way to do this w
On Mon, 3 May 2004, Michael Schwarz wrote:
> Hello Davide
>
> we heared nothing for a long time
> about the imap-version of xmail.
>
> Do you have any timeline when we
> can test a first alpha?
> (second half of 2004 or 2005)
Every time I put a deadline, sonething happen (about my spare-time)
On Sun, 2 May 2004, Shiloh Jennings wrote:
> Actually, what I posted the first time is correct. Without SA, XMail =
> would
> bomb with that fault error much more frequently than when I have SA =
> running.
> What ever "messing" SA does with certain messages seems to help keep =
> XMail
> stable.
On Sat, 1 May 2004, Beau E. Cox wrote:
> On Saturday 01 May 2004 09:16 am, Davide Libenzi wrote:
> > On Sat, 1 May 2004, Beau E. Cox wrote:
> > > Hi -
> > >
> > > I am running Linux (Sorcerer 2.6.6-rc3). For various reasons I am
> > > trying to b
On Sat, 1 May 2004, Beau E. Cox wrote:
> Hi -
>
> I am running Linux (Sorcerer 2.6.6-rc3). For various reasons I am
> trying to build a test xmailserver on the same box as my
> production server, but I have missed something. Here is what I
> have done so far:
>
> 1) patched MainLinux.cpp:
>
> -
On Fri, 30 Apr 2004, Shiloh Jennings wrote:
> I've seen the same thing happen with XMail 1.17 when I had no filters set
> up. Running SpamAssassin definitely reduces the frequency of the problem.
Maybe you need a re-phrase here: Running SpamAssassin definitely increases
the frequency of the pro
On Sat, 1 May 2004, Michal Altair Valasek wrote:
> |process. It is likely that your filter completely screw up the message
> |file, and this is not liked by XMail.
>
> The filter does not modify message file any way. It only reads it.
Then compile XMail in debug mode and either enable JITD or r
On Sat, 1 May 2004, RaveRod wrote:
> I'm sorry about resending this but my av filter went nuts today and has
> been, I guess, deleting all emails as they come in (didn't actually realise
> until now) :(
>
>
> Can you please repost and responses to this question.
XMail's sendmail is *not* a dae
On Sat, 1 May 2004, Michal Altair Valasek wrote:
> I am using XMail 1.19-pre3 on Windows 2003. It sometimes crashes and writes
> the following message to application event log:
>
> Event Type: Error
> Event Source: Application Error
> Event Category: (100)
> Event ID: 1000
> Date:
On Thu, 29 Apr 2004, Shawn Anderson wrote:
> Davide,
>
> Would it be possible to add a way to skip the CustomMapsList look up based
> on domains as well as IP address? I have a few clients that are on dynamic
> ip address for there outgoing mail server (business clients not end users)
> and it w
On Thu, 29 Apr 2004, Ken Larkman wrote:
> My time for a dumb question:
> I want all messages sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent to my postmaster
> account. I've set up the sendmail that comes with Xmail and it seems to
> work fine. However, I seem to be missing out on how to configure Xmail
> to accep
On Thu, 29 Apr 2004, Michal Altair Valasek wrote:
> |There are people who run a Windows 2003 box as just an XMail server
> |-- to me that doesn't make sense, since with the same hardware, you
> |could load Redhat from disk, install Xmail from RPMs and have just
> |about the same ease of install
On Thu, 29 Apr 2004, Benny wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Shouldn't i be able to send an email out like this:
>
> echo To:"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" && echo Subject:"Test message" && echo this is
> a test | sendmail -t -froot
>
> What am I missing here???
What's the error that you get?
- Davide
-
To unsubscr
On Thu, 29 Apr 2004, Benny wrote:
> Just in case anyone was having the same problem...
>
> You can get hylafax and xmail to play together by editing the last line
> in the [hylfax installation]/bin/notify.
>
> From this:
> ) | 2>&1 $SENDMAIL -t -ffax -oi
>
> To this:
> ) | 2>&1 $SENDMAIL -t -
On Thu, 29 Apr 2004, Beau E. Cox wrote:
> So I guess this has become a Windows-only project. Well good luck.
> Have you any idea how many Unix/Linux servers are out there?
>
> I don't see your adversion to Perl which has everthing in place,
> via CPAN, to accomplish all your needs: portable, avai
On Wed, 28 Apr 2004, Tracy wrote:
>
> Is there a limit to the number of characters that can be sent to the
> connected SMTP client using SMTPSendError? In glancing through it, I can't
> see a limit, but I'm getting session hangs with some of my error messages
> (which are, admittedly, fairly l
On Wed, 28 Apr 2004, Dustin C. Hatch wrote:
> I was wondering if it would be possible to set a proxy on XMail. I need
> this because my incoming and outgoing IP addresses are different, and
> the outgoing doesn't have an MX record on it. I cannot change this
> because it is not within my contro
On Tue, 27 Apr 2004, Stephen Wilson wrote:
> RaveRod wrote:
> > <>Is there any way to "de-loop" these messages? Would you have to
> > remove the
> > messages Received: headers manually and then resubmit the message?
>
> I have not received any more loops. I think Mr. Libenzi fixed this
> proble
On Tue, 27 Apr 2004, Goesta Smekal wrote:
> Hello list,
> I'm puzzled. Since I updated from XMail 1.9 to 1.18 (for obvious reasons ;-)
> there are strange things going on:
>
> Local users complain about SMTP timeout messages from their MUAs at no
> apperant reason. When they try to send the
On Tue, 27 Apr 2004, Liron Newman wrote:
> Yeah, happened here too.. Only 4 though. So it's not only you...
This was the genius that re-injected messages (I received about 200
bounces for mail loops):
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Now carefully removed from the list. I miss a feature in Ecartis already.
On Mon, 26 Apr 2004, Edmonds, J.B. wrote:
> Does anyone know, off the top of their head if you can block domains in
> spam-address.tab by:
>
> *.ru
That's a pretty wide filtering, isn't it? :-) (yes, you can)
- Davide
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the
On Sun, 25 Apr 2004, Benny wrote:
> Here is actually my two log(smtp) entries for the smtpfwd.tab and the
> smtpgw.tab:
These are SMAIL logs and ...
> -
>
> "thedaily.tv" "1082936267517.458779.wwwmail" "SACF9"
> "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" "[EMAIL PROT
On Sun, 25 Apr 2004, Benny wrote:
> Hmmm... Davide, did you see anything wrong with my configuration for the
> smtpfwd.tab?
>
> "aol.com"[tab]"timewarner.smtp.server"[newline]
>
> I have tested the ISPs server with my mail client and it works, and with
> the smtpgw.tab and it works, but not wi
On Sun, 25 Apr 2004, Eric Garnice wrote:
> Original Message -
> From: "Davide Libenzi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2004 9:06 PM
> Subject: [xmail] Re: aol addresses - smtpfwd.tab
>
>
> > On Su
On Sun, 25 Apr 2004, Eric Garnice wrote:
> Ben, Try putting the following in smtpgw.tab
>
> "aol.com"[tab]"@timewarner.smtp.server"[newline]
No, smtpfwd.tab must work. It is not suggested to use smtpgw.tab, since
some MTA does not support explicit routing in the recipient address.
- Davide
On Fri, 23 Apr 2004, Mike Bremford wrote:
> I've been running xmail for a few months now, and sinced I switched to
> it I've noticed the number of corrupt attachments has gone up sharply.
> Basically they're getting truncated - not every time, but enough of them
> to make life difficult. This seem
On Wed, 21 Apr 2004, Sasa Stupar wrote:
> Davide,
> I think it is time to remove the default settings for CustMapsList
> because these services (*.mail-abuse.org) are only for subscribed users.
>
> Quote:
> "The default DNS blacklist, blackholes.mail-abuse.org,
> is a service offered by the Mail
On Tue, 20 Apr 2004, Newsmirror wrote:
> cool, I've missed a @@USERAUTH macro for a long time.
> will it be part of the vanilla in/out filters also, please say yes.
I'm sorry but it's a no. At such stage the information is missing. You
have the auth header though.
- Davide
-
To unsubscribe
On Mon, 19 Apr 2004, RaveRod wrote:
> Hmm... after doing that... "ps ux" contains this:
>
> root 12259 0.5 0.4 55528 1588 pts/0S21:22 0:00
> /var/MailRoot/bin/XMail
> root 12261 0.0 0.4 55528 1588 pts/0S21:22 0:00
> /var/MailRoot/bin/XMail
> root 12262 0.0 0.
On Sun, 18 Apr 2004, Rob Arends wrote:
> Davide,
> I have a user that deleted all their email - bad luck for him!
> Now he has pleaded with me to recover his email - bad luck for me!
>
> I have a filter running that copies the xmail spool file, then returns.
> So I have a copy of the spool files
On Sun, 18 Apr 2004, Rob Arends wrote:
> Davide,
>
> I know econv.c must work, but I'm having some issues compiling it on windows
> 2000.
> I downloaded it just now from xmailserver.org
>
> First, will it compile on w2k?
> Second, here are the errors, perhaps you could give me (a non C programme
On Sat, 17 Apr 2004, Dario Jakopec wrote:
> > >> - Why is there no format like the normal filters? There is only global
> > >> filtering possible.
> > >
> > >To keep it simple. The information are all inside the passed files in any
> case.
> > >
> > >- Davide
> >
> > Agreed, but why launch the fil
On Sat, 17 Apr 2004, Pascal de R. wrote:
>
> >>> vendredi 16 avril 2004 at 16:10:48, you said :
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Davide> What do you mean for alias (in XMail terms) and what setup do you use to
> >>> Davide> make such alias?
> >>>
> >>> Alias for e-mail pop3 mailbox :
> >>>
> >>> In Xmail a
The xmailserver.org network will go down for power outage from 20:00 PST
of April 16 to 12:00 PST of April 17.
- Davide
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a mes
On Fri, 16 Apr 2004, Sasa Stupar wrote:
> Davide,
>
> I'd like to see beside custom domain forwarding also custom user
> forwarding in the same maner as domain.
> Example: file caled [EMAIL PROTECTED] under custom domain user dir with
> the same commands as for custom domain processing.
And wh
On Fri, 16 Apr 2004, Pascal de R. wrote:
> vendredi 16 avril 2004 at 16:10:48, you said :
>
>
> Davide> What do you mean for alias (in XMail terms) and what setup do you use to
> Davide> make such alias?
>
> Alias for e-mail pop3 mailbox :
>
> In Xmail aliases.tab i have :
>
> "localdomain.t
On Wed, 14 Apr 2004, Tracy wrote:
> It wouldn't hurt to have an explanation of the filter.pre-data.tab and
> filter.post-data.tab up in the section where you describe the other tab
> files (just a couple of lines that say something like "See Message
> Filtering section, below, would be fine). A
On Wed, 14 Apr 2004, Sönke Ruempler wrote:
> > Is the documentation somewhere close to be clear?
>
> Yes, but
>
> - filter_S_. filenames would be better imho.
Yes, the next version will use filters.{pre-data, post-data}.tab
> - Why is there no format like the normal filters? There is only g
On Fri, 16 Apr 2004, Pascal de R. wrote:
> Hi Davide,
>
> I recently install 1.19 for test and i got now the new following
> error message. I have many exemple like that but only when the message
> is for alias adress.
>
> For the moment i know :
>- The receiver has correctly received his m
On Thu, 15 Apr 2004, Sven Schmitt wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I just noticed that the eventlog in the W2k Server running XMail 1.17
> is filled with "Filter Error (-121)" messages. It looks like every
> email going through generates an error message like below:
>
> Filter error (-121): Sender = "[EMAIL
On Tue, 13 Apr 2004, Tracy wrote:
> OK, set up 1.19 pre 3 on Win2K Server. Haven't had time to write any "real"
> code for the pre-data and post-data filters, but the short and simple batch
> files I put in there to test with seem to be working.
Is the documentation somewhere close to be clear?
On Tue, 13 Apr 2004, D. Duccini wrote:
>
> > But you said you were seeing zombies, don't you?
>
> sorry, they are not Z type of processes that i know of, i was talking in
> the generic sense of the walking dead, sorry
>
> it is in memory, but not accepting connections -- can usually be killed
>
On Tue, 13 Apr 2004, D. Duccini wrote:
>
> > If your "locally written code" is inside external programs, that should
> > not be a problem. XMail does a double-fork now, and the grand-child gets
> > re-parented to init when the child exits. The child only wait a limited
> > timeout (90 sec defa
On Tue, 13 Apr 2004, D. Duccini wrote:
>
> > Are you running things that make XMail to execute external programs
> > (filters, "external" commands in mailproc.tab, cmd-aliases and custom
> > domains)?
>
> yes, some locally written code -- could that be causing it?
If your "locally written cod
On Tue, 13 Apr 2004, Davide Libenzi wrote:
> Guys, if you run ecartis, you need to take very special care. First, run
> it under swrap on a non privileged user:
>
> http://www.xmailserver.org/swrap.c
>
> Second, at the beginning of the "main" function add som
On Tue, 13 Apr 2004, Ken Larkman wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of D. Duccini
> > Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2004 6:09 AM
> > To: XMail mailing list
> > Subject: [xmail] XMail 1.18 (FreeBSD/Ix86) -- zombie?
> >
> >
> >
>
On Tue, 13 Apr 2004, Fred wrote:
> My setup is pretty basic, i am running 2 filters:
>
> avfilter-1.9 and sa_filter-1.3
Ok, this answer my question. Do you see any zombies around you? :-)
- Davide
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to
On Tue, 13 Apr 2004, Fred wrote:
>
> Hi, i did try xmail-1.18 on freebsd-4.8 and it works like a charm. Been
> running it since its released and everything is ok.
Are you running things that make XMail to execute external programs
(filters, "external" commands in mailproc.tab, cmd-aliases and c
On Tue, 13 Apr 2004, D. Duccini wrote:
>
> As we've loaded a new freebsd/xmail implementation up with more customers,
> we're increasingly finding it go zombie on us -- its still running in
> memory, but no longer accepts connections on either 25/110
>
> Any ideas?
I did ask for testing to BSD
On Tue, 13 Apr 2004, Wyman wrote:
> Content-Type: Text/Plain;
> charset="big5"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> Dear sir...=0D
> =0D
> My ISP has blocked my port 25... (Therefore, I cannot send out mail to ot=
> her
> mail server...) Can you tell me another way to send mail? (or n
On Mon, 12 Apr 2004, Andréas wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there any way to get the CustMapsList option in SERVER.TAB to look at all
> relay IP:s/hosts in a mail rather than just the delivering one? Sometimes I
> see spam which has passed through one or several known spam relays on the
> way to my mail ser
On Mon, 12 Apr 2004, Don Drake wrote:
>
> Is there a default setting of max # of threads? I see I can set them using
> the command-line options, but curious if an upper limit exists by default.
The maximum "settable" number of threads for POP3 and SMTP is 1024.
- Davide
-
To unsubscribe f
On Mon, 12 Apr 2004, Terry L Fritts wrote:
> Hello Davide,
>
> Do the SMTP filters provide a way to disconnect after a certain number
> of invalid recipients?
No. XMail passes you only "good" data, not rejected recipients.
- Davide
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
On Mon, 12 Apr 2004, Filip Supera wrote:
> Davide Libenzi a écrit :
>
> > - Implemented SMTP filters to allow users to reject the SMTP session
> > before and after the remote client data has been received.
>
> Been using 1.19.pre-03 and probably missed something abo
A few new features has been added:
http://www.xmailserver.org/xmail-1.19-pre03.tar.gz
- Implemented ability to stop custom mail processing upon certain exit
codes from external commands execution.
On Wed, 17 Mar 2004, JOE BO wrote:
> Hello there!
>
> I got a strange behaviour in custom domain processing when the user is
> unknown at the *custom domain* destination server.
> In this particular case the destination server already states a 550 final
> error within the SMTP-connection part.
>
On Sat, 10 Apr 2004, Beau E. Cox wrote:
> On Saturday 10 April 2004 01:59 pm, Davide Libenzi wrote:
> > On Sat, 10 Apr 2004, Davide Libenzi wrote:
> > > This is an alpha of 1.19-pre01 with SMTP filters:
> > >
> > > http://www.xmailserver.org/xmail-1.19-pre01.ta
On Sat, 10 Apr 2004, Davide Libenzi wrote:
>
> This is an alpha of 1.19-pre01 with SMTP filters:
>
> http://www.xmailserver.org/xmail-1.19-pre01.tar.gz
>
> See doc (and report possible doc improvements) for information.
Feeling blessed by the Easter, I made
This is an alpha of 1.19-pre01 with SMTP filters:
http://www.xmailserver.org/xmail-1.19-pre01.tar.gz
See doc (and report possible doc improvements) for information.
- Davide
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
On Wed, 7 Apr 2004, Ladislav Sedivy wrote:
> Ok, I built it with Visual Studio 6 (SP5):
>
> [LINKY] C:\mailroot\bin
> >xtestv6
> ** From Main **
> time = Wed Apr 07 19:56:34 2004
> timezone = 18000
> isdst= 1
> tutc = 1081382194
> tloc = 1081367794
> tval = 1081310400
> rotst
On Tue, 6 Apr 2004, Ladislav Sedivy wrote:
> Davide Libenzi wrote:
> >
> > Ouch. The test program uses exactly the same formula XMail uses to
> > generate log file names, and here all "rotstr" are fine (ending with
> > ).
> >
> >
>
On Tue, 6 Apr 2004, Ken Larkman wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Davide Libenzi
> > Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 3:45 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: [xmail] Re
On Tue, 6 Apr 2004, Ken Larkman wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Davide Libenzi
> > Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 3:29 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: [xmail] Re
On Tue, 6 Apr 2004, Ken Larkman wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Davide Libenzi
> > Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 3:20 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: [xmail] Re
On Tue, 6 Apr 2004, Ken Larkman wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Davide Libenzi
> > Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 3:07 PM
> > To: XMail mailing list
> > Subject: [xmail] Re
On Mon, 5 Apr 2004, Ladislav Sedivy wrote:
> C:\lang\projects\xtest
> >cl xtest.c /MT
> Microsoft (R) 32-bit C/C++ Optimizing Compiler Version 13.10.3077 for 80x86
> Copyright (C) Microsoft Corporation 1984-2002. All rights reserved.
>
> xtest.c
> Microsoft (R) Incremental Linker Version 7.10.30
On Tue, 6 Apr 2004, Ken Larkman wrote:
> I seem to be consistently running up against two specific problems with
> FreeBSD and Xmail in conjunction with Ecartis or Mailman.
>
> The first seems to have to do with the creation of symlinks. Integration
> scripts that are supposed to auto-create syml
On Mon, 5 Apr 2004, Ladislav Sedivy wrote:
> I restarted and they still end with 2300.
Can you try to build and run the following program on your machine?
- Davide
/*
* gcc -o timetest timetest.c -lpthread
*/
#include
#include
#include
#ifdef __GNUC__
#include
#else
#include
#endif
On Mon, 5 Apr 2004, Sönke Ruempler wrote:
> > Ok, we ran XMail under valgrind, and it did not leak. My RSS on
> > xmailserver.org never went over 8MB. My suggestion is to try a server
> > with an older glibc. Can ppl having a decent load on Linux systems
> > post the RSS value they get from 'ps'?
On Mon, 5 Apr 2004, Filip Supera wrote:
> Davide Libenzi a écrit :
>
> >
> >
> > MonArch?
Sorry, a typo:
http://www.mhonarc.org/
- Davide
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTE
On Mon, 5 Apr 2004, Filip Supera wrote:
> I need a mailbox than can not send E-mail at all. Just
> receive (backup of an other mailbox).
If you are using a closed system that requires SMTP auth, it is sufficent
that you remove the relay permission to the user.
> Can we make a mailbox read-on
On Sun, 4 Apr 2004, Ladislav Sedivy wrote:
> Can someone tell me the logic in which last four digits are generated?
> I see the following ones 0100, and the current ones 2300.
> Running 1.17 on Win2k.
They all should be . Can you try to stop and start XMail to see if it
generates
On Sun, 4 Apr 2004, Noor Dawod wrote:
> David,
>
> Is there any chance the next XMAIL release will have domain-wise
> MAILPROC.TAB file?
I believe many chances (if no showstoppers for the method will be found).
- Davide
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
t
On Fri, 2 Apr 2004, Noor Dawod wrote:
> Sure Bill.
>
> In Postfix, I had a file named ``virtual`` that had two columns, left
> one is the source address/alias/domain, and the right is the
> destination/forwarded email address(es). Observe an example:
>
> # forward one email in domain.name
> [EMA
On Sat, 3 Apr 2004, Achim Schmidt wrote:
> Am Fr, 2004-04-02 um 22.00 schrieb Davide Libenzi:
>
> > Ok, if you look carefully, all the rotation strings (rotstr) are perfectly
> > aligned to . This simple program uses exactly the same code that
> > XMail uses to gene
On Fri, 2 Apr 2004, Noor Dawod wrote:
> Hi,
>
> OK, I've read the documentation about MAILPROC.TAB, and it looks that I
> can do the redirection for a domain.
> Another thing: I searched for a file named MAILPROC.TAB in all folders,
> and haven't found any. Where do I put this file?
domains/DOMA
On Fri, 2 Apr 2004, Achim Schmidt wrote:
> Am Fr, 2004-04-02 um 19.46 schrieb Davide Libenzi:
> > Sorry, I meant XMail uptime ...
> >
> if i can believe "ps aux", XMail was started on Jan28
>
> >
> > This is strange. In my machine on xmailserver.or
On Fri, 2 Apr 2004, Achim Schmidt wrote:
> Heres the information:
>
> $ rpm -q glibc
> glibc-2.3.2-6
>
> $ uptime
> 7:32pm up 201 days 3:10, 1 user, load average: 0.23, 0.24, 0.20
Sorry, I meant XMail uptime ...
> ps:
> logfiles switched from 200403272300 to 20040329
>
On Fri, 2 Apr 2004, Jason Badry wrote:
> No, the scanning is only command-line (called from XAV). The problem is
> that there must have been some mailed queued up. After the power was
> restored and the system restarted, Xmail must have threaded things /
> called > 20 copies of Spam Assassin
1601 - 1700 of 2919 matches
Mail list logo
