[xmail] Re: Error messages

2006-11-13 Thread CLEMENT Francis
>-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >To: xmail@xmailserver.org >Sent: 11/13/06 10:14 PM >Subject: [xmail] Re: Error messages >> If the filter removed the message file, how do you plan to recover >>from that? :) >You don't - but a good MTA shou

[xmail] Re: Error messages

2006-11-13 Thread Rob Arends
member to put something witty here later... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Davide Libenzi Sent: Tuesday, 14 November 2006 5:40 AM To: xmail@xmailserver.org Subject: [xmail] Re: Error messages On Mon, 13 Nov 2006, Rob Arends wrote: >

[xmail] Re: Error messages

2006-11-13 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Mon, 13 Nov 2006, Rob Arends wrote: > > > XMail was crashing for an unhandled exceptional condition. Log would have > been of no help. > > True, but now that you have that handled, would the received email... > 1. be delivered > 2. be dropped in the bit-bucket > > And how would the event be

[xmail] Re: Error messages

2006-11-13 Thread Rob Arends
alf Of Davide Libenzi Sent: Monday, 13 November 2006 3:26 PM To: xmail@xmailserver.org Subject: [xmail] Re: Error messages On Mon, 13 Nov 2006, Rob Arends wrote: > > Davide, in the case where xmail emits an error - **other than** > smail/smtp/filter/etc log files... =20 Where does Xmai

[xmail] Re: Error messages

2006-11-12 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Mon, 13 Nov 2006, Rob Arends wrote: > > Davide, in the case where xmail emits an error - **other than** > smail/smtp/filter/etc log files... =20 > Where does Xmail write errors like "file missing on return from = > filter"?? > > I know in sendmail this is written to the maillog. In debug mo

[xmail] Re: Error messages

2006-11-12 Thread Rob Arends
On Behalf Of Filip Supera Sent: Monday, 13 November 2006 10:13 AM To: xmail@xmailserver.org Subject: [xmail] Re: Error messages Rob Arends a écrit : > Davide, in the case where xmail emits an error - **other than** > smail/smtp/filter/etc log files... > Where does Xmail write error

[xmail] Re: Error messages

2006-11-12 Thread Filip Supera
Rob Arends a écrit : > Davide, in the case where xmail emits an error - **other than** > smail/smtp/filter/etc log files... > Where does Xmail write errors like "file missing on return from filter"?? > > I know in sendmail this is written to the maillog. In debug mode it might > write to scree

[xmail] Re: Error messages returned to sender replicated

2006-01-25 Thread Jeff Buehler
Leanardo: Interesting find about the errors appearing not to be XMail generated - I will have to look into that in more detail by going over the logs when I can get the time. Clement: I use an IP in the cmdalias. The FQDN of the Exchange server resolves only to one IP. Xmail connects to the

[xmail] Re: Error messages returned to sender replicated

2006-01-24 Thread Leonardo Fogel
--- Jeff Buehler wrote: > > From: buehlertech.net PostMaster > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, January 20, 2006 2:49 PM > To: Jeff Buehler > Subject: Error sending message > [1137780666750.135234560.3ee.banshee.buehlertech.net] > from [buehlertech.net] > > (...) > > > > From: buehlert

[xmail] Re: Error messages returned to sender replicated

2006-01-24 Thread CLEMENT Francis
ces) mails before ? If you never see duplicate received messages at exchange side, its very strange because a bounce is just a another 'mail' ! Francis >-Message d'origine- >De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Jeff Buehler >Envoyé :

[xmail] Re: Error messages returned to sender replicated

2006-01-23 Thread Jeff Buehler
Oops - my apologies - thanks for catching that. I am trying to do too many things today. Here are two emails (with the same subject and message identifier (1137780666750.135234560.3ee.banshee.buehlertech.net) this time). From: buehlertech.net PostMaster [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday,

[xmail] Re: Error messages returned to sender replicated

2006-01-23 Thread Leonardo Fogel
--- Jeff Buehler wrote: > At any rate, the strange part is that each of the > messages I sent IS > from the same email. No, Jeff. They are from different e-mails. Look at the subjects, please: test4 and test3. Regards. __

[xmail] Re: Error messages returned to sender replicated

2006-01-23 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Mon, 23 Jan 2006, Jeff Buehler wrote: > > Yes - I despise Exchange, personally. However, talking the people > holding the money out of using Exchange and going with LDAP/IMAP is like > telling them that their father is a moron. They look dumbfounded and > then proceed as if nothing was said.

[xmail] Re: Error messages returned to sender replicated

2006-01-23 Thread Jeff Buehler
Yes - I despise Exchange, personally. However, talking the people holding the money out of using Exchange and going with LDAP/IMAP is like telling them that their father is a moron. They look dumbfounded and then proceed as if nothing was said. I host entirely on FreeBSD and I am just doing

[xmail] Re: Error messages returned to sender replicated

2006-01-23 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Mon, 23 Jan 2006, Jeff Buehler wrote: > > Hmmm - ok, let me look at this a little deeper (and thanks for your input!). > > In answer to your questions: > > Exchange has its own domain, but only handles internal email (so > outbound is Exchange -> ASSP -> (clamSMTP) -> Xmail -> INTERNET or > i

[xmail] Re: Error messages returned to sender replicated

2006-01-23 Thread Jeff Buehler
Thats what I thought should happen, but my Exchange users are verifiably getting multiple (it seems to be random) bounces back. Only my Exchange users seem to be affected - users accessing from a standard email client are getting the correct (single bounce) behavior). Jeff Davide Libenzi wro

[xmail] Re: Error messages returned to sender replicated

2006-01-23 Thread Jeff Buehler
Hmmm - ok, let me look at this a little deeper (and thanks for your input!). In answer to your questions: Exchange has its own domain, but only handles internal email (so outbound is Exchange -> ASSP -> (clamSMTP) -> Xmail -> INTERNET or inbound is INTERNET->ASSP -> (clamSMTP) -> XMail -> Exc

[xmail] Re: Error messages returned to sender replicated

2006-01-23 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Sat, 21 Jan 2006, Jeff Buehler wrote: > > I see. Any thoughts on what my be causing the repeat error bounces? > Has anyone else run into this problem? > If not, I would guess it has to do with the Exchange/ASSP/XMail > relationship somehow since that is the only distinct thing about my > conf

[xmail] Re: Error messages returned to sender replicated

2006-01-23 Thread Leonardo Fogel
--- Jeff Buehler wrote : > Right now I have XMail set to > try 10 times, so there > seem to be 10 emails that are sent to notify the > sender of the failure. > > (...) > Exchange users that have this problem - XMail is > running on FreeBSD, but > a number of Exchange users send through it a

[xmail] Re: Error messages returned to sender replicated

2006-01-21 Thread Jeff Buehler
I see. Any thoughts on what my be causing the repeat error bounces? Has anyone else run into this problem? If not, I would guess it has to do with the Exchange/ASSP/XMail relationship somehow since that is the only distinct thing about my configuration from a standard one... Davide, can you

[xmail] Re: Error messages returned to sender replicated

2006-01-21 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Fri, 20 Jan 2006, Jeff Buehler wrote: > > Ah ... I was unaware of that setting. It's commented out, which > according to the documentation would seem to suggest that the errors > aren't (or shouldn't be) coming from XMail at all. However, the headers > indicate (to me, anyway!) that they are

[xmail] Re: Error messages returned to sender replicated

2006-01-20 Thread Jeff Buehler
By the way, I had no indications of this happening using 1.21 or earlier. This does not mean that it didn't for certain, but I am pretty certain that it would have come up (I was running 1.21 and maybe 1.20 from the time they were made available until the newer versions with this configuratio

[xmail] Re: Error messages returned to sender replicated

2006-01-20 Thread Jeff Buehler
Ah ... I was unaware of that setting. It's commented out, which according to the documentation would seem to suggest that the errors aren't (or shouldn't be) coming from XMail at all. However, the headers indicate (to me, anyway!) that they are - here is an abbreviated example: From: buehler

[xmail] Re: Error messages returned to sender replicated

2006-01-20 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Fri, 20 Jan 2006, Jeff Buehler wrote: > > Hi everyone - > > Running XMail 1.22 my users have been reporting that "No server found" > errors are coming back in duplicate. The mails all come in after "The > maximum number of delivery attempts has been reached" and the user > receives a separate

[xmail] Re: Error messages using [EMAIL PROTECTED]

2005-12-27 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Fri, 23 Dec 2005, Adrian Hicks wrote: > > Hi all. > > I've recently upgraded to 1.22. > > Only one issue which is when XMail sends an error message. The sender of > the error message is [EMAIL PROTECTED], not [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > I have set the errors admin to [EMAIL PROTECTED] the same as i

[xmail] Re: Error messages using [EMAIL PROTECTED]

2005-12-23 Thread Leonardo Fogel
--- Adrian Hicks wrote: > The sender of > the error message is [EMAIL PROTECTED], not > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Hi. Did you "set the postmaster address?": http://www.xmailserver.org/Readme.html#server_tab_variables Regards. ___

[xmail] Re: Error messages

2004-03-18 Thread CLEMENT Francis
25) and manually send a mail (same 'mail from' and 'rcpt to' as used in the = rejected mail) to see any error ... > -Message d'origine- > De : Vitor Renato Alves de Brito [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Envoy=E9 : jeudi 18 mars 2004 14:25 > =C0 : [EMAIL P

[xmail] Re: Error messages

2004-03-18 Thread Vitor Renato Alves de Brito
:-))) I forgot the question. :-))) Here the question: The header seems to be ok, then, why the server does not accept the message? Maybe because the 192.168.1.0 network? Maybe because the firewall router? Thanks. On Wed, 17 Mar 2004, Tracy wrote: > At 15:34 3/17/2004, Vitor Renato Alves de B

[xmail] Re: Error messages

2004-03-17 Thread Tracy
At 15:34 3/17/2004, Vitor Renato Alves de Brito wrote: >Hi, > >More information about this server: > >- FreeBSD 5.0 >- XMail 1.17 > >It has a wireless connection and then it has a invalid IP >(192.168.1.50) on a ethernet card. > >The wireless connection: > >ISP side (wireless) -> server side (wirel

[xmail] Re: Error messages

2004-03-17 Thread Vitor Renato Alves de Brito
Hi, More information about this server: - FreeBSD 5.0 - XMail 1.17 It has a wireless connection and then it has a invalid IP (192.168.1.50) on a ethernet card. The wireless connection: ISP side (wireless) -> server side (wireless radio with a ethernet) -> Firewall router D-Link (ethernet) IP 2

[xmail] Re: Error messages

2004-03-17 Thread Tracy
At 08:52 3/17/2004, Vitor Renato Alves de Brito wrote: >Hi, > >Could somebody please help me with this error messages? > ><< >ErrCode = -82 >ErrString = [RCPT TO:] not permitted by remote SMTP server >ErrInfo = 553 VERIFIQUE SE AS CONFIGURACOES PARA ENVIO DE MENSAGENS SAO >AS >MESMAS UTILIZADAS

[xmail] Re: Error messages

2001-12-11 Thread Sönke Ruempler
> I think they mean the text message sent in response of a delivery failure, > not the SMTP protocol error string. > right i mean something like From: "Mail Delivery Subsystem" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 6:01 PM Subject: Returned mail: User unknown The or

[xmail] Re: Error messages

2001-12-11 Thread Peter Lindeman
On Tue, 11 Dec 2001 09:41:26 -0800 (PST), Davide Libenzi wrote: >> What you *could* do is create a wrapper of sorts or a front-end to the xmail >> server and have translation process of incoming error messages from xmail to >> preset to users. This isn't such a hot idea either because... well...

[xmail] Re: Error messages

2001-12-11 Thread Sönke Ruempler
> Don't mean to stick my nose in here... but I don't believe this would a good > idea mostly because xmail *must* be 100% RFC compliant. Heheh but think of all the AOL-Users (e.g.) in the world ("rfc, is that something to eat??"). they *need* user friendly messages (in their language). And if x

[xmail] Re: Error messages

2001-12-11 Thread Dave Palmer
> > Will you implement a feature that makes it possible to create own > error msgs > ? Don't mean to stick my nose in here... but I don't believe this would a good idea mostly because xmail *must* be 100% RFC compliant. What you *could* do is create a wrapper of sorts or a front-end to the xmail

[xmail] Re: Error messages

2001-12-11 Thread Jan Patorra
hi, > does XMail send an error message to the user if one mail could not be delivered? yes, it does...afair it does this after the number of delivery tries you've configured. davide: what about critical error's such as no mx record for the destination domain (and no smtp server directly at the d

[xmail] Re: Error messages

2001-12-11 Thread Sönke Ruempler
> > Hi, > > > > does XMail send an error message to the user if one mail could not be delivered? > > and if so, where can i change the messages? > > Sure it sends, to the sender and, if you set "ErrorsAdmin" in server.tab, > even to an extra account ( postmaster,... ). But no email to the user w