On Thu, 20 May 2004, Chad Fleenor wrote:
> The only time i can tell that it gets called is when an attachment has
> been sent with it.
>
> I created a file to log who is sending the file and to who it is going
> to, in the domains.pl file... well this only is writing when a file is
> sent out to
The only time i can tell that it gets called is when an attachment has
been sent with it.
I created a file to log who is sending the file and to who it is going
to, in the domains.pl file... well this only is writing when a file is
sent out to someone from the internal domains.
On Thu, 2004-05
On Thu, 20 May 2004, Chad Fleenor wrote:
> This is in my filters.out.tab
> "*" "*" "0.0.0.0/0" "0.0.0.0/0" "avout.tab"
> "*" "*" "0.0.0.0/0" "0.0.0.0/0" "domains.tab"
>
> Is this in wrong??
Does it get called at all?
- Davide
-
To unsubscribe from this list: s
This is in my filters.out.tab
"*" "*" "0.0.0.0/0" "0.0.0.0/0" "avout.tab"
"*" "*" "0.0.0.0/0" "0.0.0.0/0" "domains.tab"
Is this in wrong??
chad
On Wed, 2004-05-19 at 17:33, Davide Libenzi wrote:
> On Wed, 19 May 2004, Chad Fleenor wrote:
>
> > I'm wanting to wr
On Wed, 19 May 2004, Chad Fleenor wrote:
> I'm wanting to write a filter that will filter out a certain address
> form sending any email. Does anyone have an idea how to do this? I
> have this so far but it seams that the file isn't execute until someone
> sends a file out.
>
>
> #!/usr/bin/
On Wednesday 07 April 2004 04:55 am, Edmonds, J.B. wrote:
> I started this thread so I will jump in. =20
>
> A good AV solution is the first line of defense. Many organizations
> also block executables and scripts to catch new viruses that have not
> been added to definitions. The porn issue is a
ssage-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Shawn Anderson
Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 7:23 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [xmail] Re: Filter Question
Sure it can be turned off.
Check this free add-in out:
http://www.slovaktech.com/attachmentoptions.htm
Sha
: Filter Question
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeffrey L. Conley
> Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 1:29 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [xmail] Re: Filter Question
>
>
>
> Tell that to M$, newer v
Scott wrote:
> I know of a few businesses and gov't mail servers that uses this
> strategy in conjuction with a virus scanner. But its not only an aid to
> stop viruses, its used to control what type of information is allowed.
>no images(probably because of porn), avi, executables, you get
Edmonds, J.B. wrote:
> Has anyone implemented a filter that strips attachments with specific
> extensions such as exe, html, asp, etc.
>
> I am looking for one that I can feed a list of extensions, have those
> stripped and the mail message updated to reflect they have been deleted.
>
> I wasn't
I agree, I used to use this method when I was using Communigate. I
might try to hack something together, but I am not very skilled in the
areas of perl/c++. Just java, really.
Peter, in your experience, do you think this(stripping attachments based
on extension) is a difficult task or not? I
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott
> Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 1:47 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [xmail] Re: Filter Question
>
>
[SNIP]
>
> Yes of course the files can be renamed
Peter Lindeman wrote:
>
> I understand that but what is the use for it?!? Just scan for viruses
> and if not a virus let the user send whatever he/she likes. If you strip
> these attachments they will call it .bin.exe.txt and send it anyway. It
> will not protect anything if stripping that way
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeffrey L. Conley
> Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 1:29 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [xmail] Re: Filter Question
>
>
>
> Tell that to M$, newer versions of out
Chris L. Franklin wrote:
> that way you can remove BAd file type from your users,
>
> examples of bad type:
> ...vbs
> ...js
> ...exe.zip
> ...bin.exe
I understand that but what is the use for it?!? Just scan for viruses
and if not a virus let the user send whatever he/she likes. If you strip
: Filter Question
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris L. Franklin
> Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 1:20 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [xmail] Re: Filter Question
>
>
> that way you can remove BA
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris L. Franklin
> Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 1:20 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [xmail] Re: Filter Question
>
>
> that way you can remove BAd file type from y
that way you can remove BAd file type from your users,
examples of bad type:
..vbs
..js
..exe.zip
..bin.exe
-- Chris L. Franklin --
- Original Message -
From: "Peter Lindeman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 2:47 PM
Subje
Edmonds, J.B. wrote:
> Has anyone implemented a filter that strips attachments with specific
> extensions such as exe, html, asp, etc.
>
> I am looking for one that I can feed a list of extensions, have those
> stripped and the mail message updated to reflect they have been deleted.
>
> I wasn't
- Original Message
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [xmail] Filter question
Date: 01/08/04 13:25
>
> Can anyone tell me how to call an external perl script from with in
another
> perl script?
>
> For example when a certain condition is tru
> I know it does not do this right now, I was describing the new behaviour.
ah ok great :-)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Doing filtering during the "in" stage should have the real mailbox already
> selected, so it should work like you want.
simply no. tested that. i've been requesting that feature about half a year
:-)
if a mail for [EMAIL PROTECTED] arrives the xmail server, [EMAIL PROTECTED] is
used, even if [
> > hmm you are working at the filter architecture? i would love to see a
> > mailproc.tab filter command :-) thx in advance, soenke.
>
> I was thinking about having two set of filters, "in" && "out"
> The "in" filters are applied to messages being delivered locally while the
> "out" filters being
- Original Message -
From: "Davide Libenzi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Newsgroups: saltstorm.xmail
Sent: Saturday, November 30, 2002 7:57 PM
Subject: [xmail] Re: Filter question
>
> On Sat, 30 Nov 2002, [iso-8859-1] S=F6nke Ruempler wrote:
>
> >
> > &g
> In 1.12 it'll do :
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> domain.com.tab
> com.tab
> ..tab
hmm you are working at the filter architecture? i would love to see a
mailproc.tab filter command :-) thx in advance, soenke.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message
Davide,
According to the docs it does do .tab now as well.
http://www.xmailserver.org/Readme.html#domain%20message%20filters
Bill
>--
>From: Davide Libenzi[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Friday, November 29, 2002 11:58 AM
>To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: [xm
26 matches
Mail list logo
