[xmail] Re: config files discussion

2007-02-21 Thread Ivo Smits
Jeffrey Laramie wrote: On Tuesday 20 February 2007 12:32, Davide Libenzi wrote: On Tue, 20 Feb 2007, Dave Henderson wrote: Davide, Thanks for your reply. I can see your points. It was just a question I had as it seems alot of the daemons I use, use the apache style or a

[xmail] Re: config files discussion

2007-02-20 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Mon, 19 Feb 2007, Dave Henderson wrote: Gang, I have not used xmail very much (or any email daemon for that matter) but had a question regarding the configuration files for xmail. I noticed that it uses several many different files and wondered if there was ever going to be any

[xmail] Re: config files discussion

2007-02-20 Thread CLEMENT Francis
-Message d'origine- De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Davide Libenzi Envoy=E9 : mardi 20 f=E9vrier 2007 16:28 =C0 : 'xmail@xmailserver.org' Objet : [xmail] Re: config files discussion On Mon, 19 Feb 2007, Dave Henderson wrote: Gang, I have not used xmail

[xmail] Re: config files discussion

2007-02-20 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Tue, 20 Feb 2007, Dave Henderson wrote: Davide, Thanks for your reply. I can see your points. It was just a question I had as it seems alot of the daemons I use, use the apache style or a single config file method. The daemons also don't lock the files when reading them, they

[xmail] Re: config files discussion

2007-02-20 Thread Jeffrey Laramie
On Tuesday 20 February 2007 12:32, Davide Libenzi wrote: On Tue, 20 Feb 2007, Dave Henderson wrote: Davide, Thanks for your reply. I can see your points. It was just a question I had as it seems alot of the daemons I use, use the apache style or a single config file method. The