On Thu, 20 May 2004, Chad Fleenor wrote:
This is in my filters.out.tab
* * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 avout.tab
* * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 domains.tab
Is this in wrong??
Does it get called at all?
- Davide
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe
On Thu, 20 May 2004, Chad Fleenor wrote:
The only time i can tell that it gets called is when an attachment has
been sent with it.
I created a file to log who is sending the file and to who it is going
to, in the domains.pl file... well this only is writing when a file is
sent out to
On Wed, 19 May 2004, Chad Fleenor wrote:
I'm wanting to write a filter that will filter out a certain address
form sending any email. Does anyone have an idea how to do this? I
have this so far but it seams that the file isn't execute until someone
sends a file out.
#!/usr/bin/perl
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Shawn Anderson
Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 7:23 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [xmail] Re: Filter Question
Sure it can be turned off.
Check this free add-in out:
http://www.slovaktech.com/attachmentoptions.htm
Shawn=20
On Wednesday 07 April 2004 04:55 am, Edmonds, J.B. wrote:
I started this thread so I will jump in. =20
A good AV solution is the first line of defense. Many organizations
also block executables and scripts to catch new viruses that have not
been added to definitions. The porn issue is a
Edmonds, J.B. wrote:
Has anyone implemented a filter that strips attachments with specific
extensions such as exe, html, asp, etc.
I am looking for one that I can feed a list of extensions, have those
stripped and the mail message updated to reflect they have been deleted.
I wasn't able
that way you can remove BAd file type from your users,
examples of bad type:
..vbs
..js
..exe.zip
..bin.exe
-- Chris L. Franklin --
- Original Message -
From: Peter Lindeman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 2:47 PM
Subject: [xmail] Re: Filter
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris L. Franklin
Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 1:20 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [xmail] Re: Filter Question
that way you can remove BAd file type from your users,
examples of bad type
: Filter Question
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris L. Franklin
Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 1:20 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [xmail] Re: Filter Question
that way you can remove BAd file type from your users,
examples
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeffrey L. Conley
Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 1:29 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [xmail] Re: Filter Question
Tell that to M$, newer versions of outlook and outlook
express do just
Peter Lindeman wrote:
I understand that but what is the use for it?!? Just scan for viruses
and if not a virus let the user send whatever he/she likes. If you strip
these attachments they will call it .bin.exe.txt and send it anyway. It
will not protect anything if stripping that way
I
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott
Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 1:47 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [xmail] Re: Filter Question
[SNIP]
Yes of course the files can be renamed, but then how many users will
think
I agree, I used to use this method when I was using Communigate. I
might try to hack something together, but I am not very skilled in the
areas of perl/c++. Just java, really.
Peter, in your experience, do you think this(stripping attachments based
on extension) is a difficult task or not?
Scott wrote:
I know of a few businesses and gov't mail servers that uses this
strategy in conjuction with a virus scanner. But its not only an aid to
stop viruses, its used to control what type of information is allowed.
no images(probably because of porn), avi, executables, you get the
: Filter Question
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeffrey L. Conley
Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 1:29 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [xmail] Re: Filter Question
Tell that to M$, newer versions of outlook and outlook express do
hmm you are working at the filter architecture? i would love to see a
mailproc.tab filter command :-) thx in advance, soenke.
I was thinking about having two set of filters, in out
The in filters are applied to messages being delivered locally while the
out filters being applied to
Doing filtering during the in stage should have the real mailbox already
selected, so it should work like you want.
simply no. tested that. i've been requesting that feature about half a year
:-)
if a mail for [EMAIL PROTECTED] arrives the xmail server, [EMAIL PROTECTED] is
used, even if
I know it does not do this right now, I was describing the new behaviour.
ah ok great :-)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: Davide Libenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Newsgroups: saltstorm.xmail
Sent: Saturday, November 30, 2002 7:57 PM
Subject: [xmail] Re: Filter question
On Sat, 30 Nov 2002, [iso-8859-1] S=F6nke Ruempler wrote:
In 1.12 it'll do :
[EMAIL PROTECTED
19 matches
Mail list logo
