http://www.hunes.co.jp/oki/xmail_spamc/defaulten.htm
I add UML Sequence table (PDF) on my page.
It's help for how filter process work.
Miyuki-san, I think the translation to PDF uses .jp fonts still, so Gnome
PDF cannot show it correctly.
Thank you Davide-san again.
Now I had
Well thank you. I will work on it some more. I have now a filter and
tab in place, but it says to be sure that spamd si running and I have
no way of knowing how to start it or what not.
I have run SpamAssassin with ActivePerl
and Spamd.bat (to run is simple. double click from explorer)
On Fri, 9 Sep 2005, OKI Miyuki wrote:
Well thank you. I will work on it some more. I have now a filter and
tab in place, but it says to be sure that spamd si running and I have
no way of knowing how to start it or what not.
¡¡I have run SpamAssassin with ActivePerl
and Spamd.bat (to run is
How does ASSP flake out - I haven't had any problems with ASSP
(running on FreeBSD 5.x, anyway). ASSP is the best solution I have found.
Jeff
Digerati Isabaddass wrote:
I am not sure if this got through the first time so here goes again.
What can I use that will not cost anything to
pft please you think I have not done that already?
I have spamassassin installed already.
Cant figure out how to hook it to xmail in case you failed to read
through my post.
Next time link me to something useful other than a google search.
Link me direct.
On 9/8/05, Sönke Ruempler
On 08.09.2005 22:13, Digerati Isabaddass wrote:
pft please you think I have not done that already?
I have spamassassin installed already.
Cant figure out how to hook it to xmail in case you failed to read
through my post.
Next time link me to something useful other than a google
Yes ASSP was Great to me for the longest time.
Then one day we could not send emails they would time out untill I
stopped ASSP and ran xmail on its own.
I really cant tell whats going on cause all things look good.
When it acts up you cant telnet to port 25 without it taking like 90
secs to
Well thank you. I will work on it some more. I have now a filter and
tab in place, but it says to be sure that spamd si running and I have
no way of knowing how to start it or what not.
On 9/8/05, Sönke Ruempler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 08.09.2005 22:13, Digerati Isabaddass wrote:
On 08.09.2005 22:33, Digerati Isabaddass wrote:
Well thank you. I will work on it some more. I have now a filter and
tab in place, but it says to be sure that spamd si running and I have
no way of knowing how to start it or what not.
I have no experiences with windows servers, so the only
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Sönke Ruempler
Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2005 3:43 PM
To: xmail@xmailserver.org
Subject: [xmail] Re: stopping spam
On 08.09.2005 22:33, Digerati Isabaddass wrote:
Well thank you. I will work on it some more. I have now a filter
On 9/8/2005 5:16 PM Jason J. Ellingson wrote:
I have run SpamAssasin on Windows servers (both with ActivePerl and CygWin)
and Linux servers. Running SpamAssassin on Linux (or other unix) runs much
faster and more reliably than on Windows.
I run XMail on a Windows server and SpamAssassin on
I would look more closely at what is causing the problem with ASSP and
continue to use that. I like it much better than Spam Assassin myself,
at least for use with XMail. It is far more efficient since it handles
the SPAM check in the SMTP session then closes it after a specified
number of
Subject: [xmail] Re: stopping spam
To my knowledge (and I have done some searching in the past), no one has
developed a decent XMail filter for SpamAssassin in serial mode on Windows.
At work I'm forced to run my XMail relay directly on the Exchange server
and use Dario's XSpamC to call
: [xmail] Re: stopping spam
I would look more closely at what is causing the problem with ASSP and
continue to use that. I like it much better than Spam Assassin myself,
at least for use with XMail. It is far more efficient since it handles
the SPAM check in the SMTP session then closes
PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jeff Buehler
Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2005 7:12 PM
To: xmail@xmailserver.org
Subject: [xmail] Re: stopping spam
I would look more closely at what is causing the problem with ASSP and
continue to use that. I like it much better than Spam Assassin myself,
at least for use
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jeff Buehler
Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2005 8:12 PM
To: xmail@xmailserver.org
Subject: [xmail] Re: stopping spam
Ah - I was only referring to a Spam Assassin filter I sued with XMail,
and in my case as of about a year ago (the last time I set it up and
used
Dale Qualls wrote:
Is anyone using this with good results?
Yes and it is very good However, it takes about a week to make it
reliable.
Christian Gross
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send
Bayesian filtering is ineffective at the MTA level. There are too many
varying definitions of what constitutes spam - there will either be
significant false positives, or significant false negatives.
I speak from experience here - I implemented an MTA level bayesian filter
on my mail server
Is anyone using this with good results?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/10/04 07:53AM
http://assp.sourceforge.net/=20
Edinilson
-
ATINET-Professional Web Hosting
Tel Voz: (0xx11) 4412-0876
http://www.atinet.com.br=20
---
Outgoing mail is
Sounds promising.
s.
Is anyone using this with good results?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/10/04 07:53AM
http://assp.sourceforge.net/=20
Edinilson
-
I merely function as a channel that filters music through
the chaos of noise
- Vangelis
20 matches
Mail list logo
