[xmail] Re: Another question.

2003-01-24 Thread slackl
- Original Message - From: Brandon Wittenburg [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 6:08 PM Subject: [xmail] Re: Another question. slackl wrote: I have setted up an XMail and it is not generating confirmation receipts and delivery notifications

[xmail] Re: imap roadmap

2003-01-24 Thread Liron Newman
Davide Libenzi wrote: On Thu, 23 Jan 2003, [iso-8859-1] S=F6nke Ruempler wrote: hello davide, just wondered when you plan to add imap support. just a question :-) I started by trying to do a separate module but became a mess and required also the standard XMail to be heavily

[xmail] psync features

2003-01-24 Thread Martin Schmid
Hello all, hello Davide I'm using psync to download mail from external mailboxes. Some of them are mail drops for nultiple users and multiple domains. In the pop3links.tab I placed a line like this: ?local.mydomain.org,myfirstdomain.org,myseconddomain.org,mythirddomain.org user .

[xmail] Re: psync features

2003-01-24 Thread Martin Schmid
or should I set up pop3links.tab with something like .local and use aliasdomains.tab to forward the messages to the local domain's mail drops? Martin Schmid schrieb: Hello all, hello Davide I'm using psync to download mail from external mailboxes. Some of them are mail drops for

[xmail] Re: Another question.

2003-01-24 Thread Brandon Wittenburg
You are not right up to the end. There are two confirmation types: One is Read Confirmation and is generated by the mail client. You are right at this point. But another is Delivery Confirmation and is hanlded by MTA. It is generated by MTA when it relayed a message to a destination and done it

[xmail] Re: Another question.

2003-01-24 Thread slackl
[skip] My problem is that XMail seems to be fully ignorant to the second type of confirmation requests. It seems I am ingnorant of the second type as well. http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1891.txt (section 5) http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2532.txt (section 2) Thank you for enlightening me. :)

[xmail] little help needed

2003-01-24 Thread Jim
A few of my users are getting emails sent back to them with this message: Failed ! SMTP-Error = 550 66.99.120.227 must be verifiable in DNS I run the latest xmail and there is a forward reverse hostname attached to that IP. Full message == ErrCode = -41 ErrString = Bad server response

[xmail] Re: little help needed

2003-01-24 Thread Jim
I have all ICMP including pings turned off. It's odd though.. I just tried sending to another worldnet.att.net user and it seems to have worked. - Original Message - From: Aaron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, January 24, 2003 2:44 PM Subject: [xmail] Re:

[xmail] Re: little help needed

2003-01-24 Thread Jim
Thanks for the info Don, you're always there to help :) Jim - Original Message - From: Don Drake [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, January 24, 2003 2:51 PM Subject: [xmail] Re: little help needed A search on Usenet found 2 other people who had the same problem

[xmail] internal spoolfile delivered as mail

2003-01-24 Thread Michael Schwarz
Hello Davide and list in the last few days i become some mails from a sourceforge-list as i append below. It seems that it is a spooled file from xmail, as it has the internal spoolheader included at the top. Is there an error on the server or what else??? Bye Michael

[xmail] Re: imap roadmap

2003-01-24 Thread Liron Newman
Davide Libenzi wrote: On Fri, 24 Jan 2003, Liron Newman wrote: Hmm.. Don't forget these successes are only on Linux! Don't forget us Windows users.. :) I thought you all migrated to Linux, didn't you ? :) Don't stop compiling those Win32 binaries just yet. :) Anyway, do you have

[xmail] Re: internal spoolfile delivered as mail

2003-01-24 Thread Michael Schwarz
Hello Davide thanks for the quick answer. I am only using the 'AntiVirus Filter 1.3' from Peter Lindeman with F-Prot and AntiVir. But in the script, if infection was found, the mail was rejected without notice (DOMAIN MESSAGE FILTERS, returncode 98). Any ideas? Bye Michael -Original

[xmail] FW: Re: internal spoolfile delivered as mail

2003-01-24 Thread Michael Schwarz
Ups... without notice (DOMAIN MESSAGE FILTERS, returncode 98). And NEW message is send to the sender, receipient and the admin with a warning. Michael -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Michael Schwarz Sent: Saturday, January 25,

[xmail] Re: internal spoolfile delivered as mail

2003-01-24 Thread Andrew Joakimsen
And the message shows up without a subject and such? For some reason I USED to have the problem. I dont remember when it stopped doing it, it was either between chaning from RH 8.0 to 7.3 and using the version I compliled or something having to do with using the antivirus scripts. -Mensaje