Ok, so use the link Mircea gave you, then look just a little lower on the
page, and tada, you have what you're looking for.
F#$% blind
Rob :-)
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Verner A.
> Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2004 3:49
Not IP address,
I have disable domain as is *.abo.wanadoo.fr
- Original Message -
From: "Mircea Ciocan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2004 4:15 PM
Subject: [xmail] Re: Spammer's Domain
> Verner A. wrote:
>
> >How to forbid reception spamm me
This would be a filter, would it not?
Rob :-)
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of D. Duccini
> Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2004 10:18 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [xmail] SMTP HEADER/BODY MODIFIFICATIONS?
>
>
> Is it possib
Is it possible to add a process in on SMTP transactions?
>From automatic builds of 'white-lists', to the ability to tack on an
additional header or the ability to tack on an inline webbug, i'd like to
have the option of doing a little processing on the message prior to its
delivery
This is complicated, when from an MUA perspective, an ISP will accept you
smtp *only* if it is from its dialup/customer network.
ie. You are connected to the net via some other ISP (there are many reasons
for this) and you need to send mail. Logically this would be sent to your
ISP's smtp server,
MHO is what you're missing is the ISPs who make money out of
people filling our mailboxes with vomit.
Another kind of ISP is the ones who don't give a rats' *ss about it.
At least that's the story down here.
Eventhough a couple of them do have ethics and the adequate
collection of know-how, hard
Hello all
Something for discussion:
In my opinion would fighting against spam be so easy
if we have this consens in the whole internet-'family':
- each smtp-server accepts mails only:
from servers with fixed IPs and DNS is set correct
(not in the range of dailups-IPs)
and
Hello Gustavo,
Wednesday, February 4, 2004 you wrote:
GG> If we can't validate a sender, anyone can setup a mail server and send em=
GG> ail=20
GG> with a false identity (like virus does).
GG> Have you a idea to solve this ?
You work with what you have and SMTP has limitations.
You can a
Hi Gustavo,
Gustavo Galvan wrote:
> If we can't validate a sender, anyone can setup a mail server and send em=
> ail=20
> with a false identity (like virus does).
> Have you a idea to solve this ?
>
(Thinking aloud...and not seen all of earlier threads)
- I don't think we can validate the origi
At 06:07 2/4/2004, Gustavo Galvan wrote:
>El Mar 03 Feb 2004 07:57, Terry L Fritts escribi=F3:
> > Tuesday, February 3, 2004 you wrote:
> > CF> This is not good since many domains don't allways have complete A
> > CF> or =3D cname records for all of they sending computers (mta ou mua)
> > CF> ... R
El Mar 03 Feb 2004 07:57, Terry L Fritts escribi=F3:
> Tuesday, February 3, 2004 you wrote:
> CF> This is not good since many domains don't allways have complete A
> CF> or =3D cname records for all of they sending computers (mta ou mua)
> CF> ... Remember many legitimate mail can come indirectly f
Hi all,
I have a problem with RDNS check.
For spam problems (do you know about it? ;) I seted SMTP-RDNSCheck =
parameter to 1.
Now, there is a domain that has more MX record with priority not equal.
If the e-mail comes from server with higher priority all goes well, but =
if the e-mail comes from a
Verner A. wrote:
>How to forbid reception spamm messages from the certain domains.
>
>Example:
>Log statistic
> 62 ALagny-110-1-7-248.w81-248.abo.wanadoo.fr | 1
> 63 ALille-208-1-10-236.w80-15.abo.wanadoo.fr | 1
> 64 ALyon-209-1-33-41.w81-249.abo.wanadoo.fr | 2
> 65 AMarseille-102-1-4-208.w80-
How to forbid reception spamm messages from the certain domains.
Example:
Log statistic
62 ALagny-110-1-7-248.w81-248.abo.wanadoo.fr | 1
63 ALille-208-1-10-236.w80-15.abo.wanadoo.fr | 1
64 ALyon-209-1-33-41.w81-249.abo.wanadoo.fr | 2
65 AMarseille-102-1-4-208.w80-14.abo.wanadoo.fr | 1
66
Resources consumed by filters generally depend on your hardware and =
platform.
Maybe such implementation should be made customizable, e.g. if the event =
fires
after each RCPT or enable/disable this or that event ...
I aim to be as flexible as possible. So if you have many hooks and you =
can
use
15 matches
Mail list logo
