Re: [xmail] maildir home path for xmail and dovecot ?

2009-12-24 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Thu, 24 Dec 2009, Spyros Tsiolis wrote: > Hello, > > I happen to try to make XMail work with dovecot these days. > > I don't know if Dovecot is of any interested to you. > However, my choice was this because I've been using XMail for nine years now > and > I am pretty happy with it and don't

[xmail] XMail 1.27-pre06

2009-12-24 Thread Davide Libenzi
Here are the links: http://www.xmailserver.org/xmail-1.27-pre06.tar.gz http://www.xmailserver.org/xmail-1.27-pre06.win32bin.zip The ChangeLog is inside the archives. - Davide ___ xmail mailing list xmail@xmailserver.org http://xmailserver.org/mailma

Re: [xmail] Suggestion: handling of invalid addresses in spool file

2009-12-24 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Thu, 24 Dec 2009, Francesco Vertova wrote: > At 19.26 24/12/09, you wrote: > > > The bug was introduced in one of the 1.27-pre?? releases. 1.26 is infe. > > Nope, the bug is in 1.26. We talking about different issues? Let me replay that for you: On Thu, 24 Dec 2009, Chen Shihai wrote:

Re: [xmail] Suggestion: handling of invalid addresses in spool file

2009-12-24 Thread Francesco Vertova
At 19.26 24/12/09, you wrote: The bug was introduced in one of the 1.27-pre?? releases. 1.26 is infe. Nope, the bug is in 1.26. I know exactly what happened. The "is this email path correct?" check done at SMTP level and at SMAIL level, were not symmetric. The check was (not?) done at the

Re: [xmail] Suggestion: handling of invalid addresses in spool file

2009-12-24 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Thu, 24 Dec 2009, Davide Libenzi wrote: > On Thu, 24 Dec 2009, Francesco Vertova wrote: > > > At 18.04 24/12/09, you wrote: > > > > > What you have seen in the latest bug report, it is a bug. > > > > Do you mean there's a bug in XMail? (I'm still using 1.26 on my server). > > The bug was in

Re: [xmail] Suggestion: handling of invalid addresses in spool file

2009-12-24 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Thu, 24 Dec 2009, Francesco Vertova wrote: > At 18.04 24/12/09, you wrote: > > > What you have seen in the latest bug report, it is a bug. > > Do you mean there's a bug in XMail? (I'm still using 1.26 on my server). The bug was introduced in one of the 1.27-pre?? releases. 1.26 is infe. >

Re: [xmail] Suggestion: handling of invalid addresses in spool file

2009-12-24 Thread Francesco Vertova
At 18.04 24/12/09, you wrote: What you have seen in the latest bug report, it is a bug. Do you mean there's a bug in XMail? (I'm still using 1.26 on my server). Let me explain what I think has happened: webmail created a file in spool/local with a header like this: MAIL FROM: RCPT TO: RCPT

Re: [xmail] Suggestion: handling of invalid addresses in spool file

2009-12-24 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Thu, 24 Dec 2009, Francesco Vertova wrote: > Hi all, > > if an address in the envelope of a spool file fails the syntax check (I had an > example of a null recipient, "RCPT TO:<>"), currently XMail raises a -55 > ERR_INVALID_SPOOL_FILE error and silently freezes the message. > > I think in th

Re: [xmail] maildir home path for xmail and dovecot ?

2009-12-24 Thread Spyros Tsiolis
Hello, I happen to try to make XMail work with dovecot these days. I don't know if Dovecot is of any interested to you. However, my choice was this because I've been using XMail for nine years now and I am pretty happy with it and don't want to drop it under any circumstances.. So here goes wha

[xmail] Suggestion: handling of invalid addresses in spool file

2009-12-24 Thread Francesco Vertova
Hi all, if an address in the envelope of a spool file fails the syntax check (I had an example of a null recipient, "RCPT TO:<>"), currently XMail raises a -55 ERR_INVALID_SPOOL_FILE error and silently freezes the message. I think in these cases a bounce would be appropriate, to let the send