command in the mailproc.
Does anyone know what might be going on here?
Thanks!
Sincerely,
Bart Mortelmans
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
fault. Within some circumstances, my script
wouldn't return 7 while it did modify the file. And that's what was
happening here...
Sorry for the bother!
Sincerely,
Bart Mortelmans
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED
that the delay does also has its benefits. Spam
that is delayed, is more likely to be captured by an other filter
(blacklist, Pyzor, Razor, DCC, ...).
Any thoughts?
Sincerely,
Bart Mortelmans
Filip Supera wrote:
Hello,
Just heard about this in the Spamtools mailing list :
http
-schedule for no
response from the primary MX, or a temporary error (4xx). I would assume
that most MTA's would handle both the same way, but haven't tested this yet.
Sincerely,
Bart Mortelmans
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED
aborted: (-100) local error in processing
===
I have done a couple of other successful XMailserver installations in
the past and haven't seen this error before. Does anyone know what could
be causing this?
Thanks!
Sincerely,
Bart Mortelmans
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
2
MAIL_ROOT=$XMAIL_ROOT
export MAIL_ROOT
MAIL_CMD_LINE=$XMAIL_CMD_LINE
export MAIL_CMD_LINE
export LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.6.19
/var/MailRoot/bin/XMail -Pl -Sl -Cl -Ll -Mm -Ql --debug -Md
I'll try some more things, but am unsure where to look...
Sincerely,
Bart Mortelmans
-
To unsubscribe
As far as I know, the SMAIL log will only show an SMTP-line for e-mails
that where successfully delivered on the other end. So basically, the
fact that your SMAIL log contains such a line, means that Yahoo accepted
the email and that it was lost on their side...
Sincerely,
Bart Mortelmans
according to SPF and that don't get
forwarded, are more likely to get through the spam filters.
But your SPF record is best to also allow mails from other servers
simply because you never know if your recipient might be using forwarding.
Sincerely,
Bart Mortelmans
CLEMENT Francis wrote
Thanks for clearing that out!
Then my next question would be: is there something that would implement
SRS in forwarding within XMailserver?
Sincerely,
Bart Mortelmans
CLEMENT Francis wrote:
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Bart
Are you sure? Should be contrariwise in my opinion, the machine with problem
gets no MX record. Can you set the same DNS server on both XMail machines?
Preferably the working one as most likely is a DNS issue.
If no MX-records are found, then the A-record is used. So if there is an
PS : Notice that the order in your post-data filters chain should be
anti-virus filter then anti-spam filter as pure av scan engines are =
generaly
faster than a 'complex' anti-spam scan engine (so viruses will be as =
soon as
possible rejected without taking to much time)
I'm not sure
behaviour?
Thanks for looking into this!
Sincerely,
Bart Mortelmans
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
time I run it.
Any ideas of what might be going wrong? Could this be caused by some
faulty setting somewhere?
Sincerely,
Bart Mortelmans
Op 15-jun-08, om 01:13 heeft Davide Libenzi het volgende geschreven:
On Fri, 13 Jun 2008, Bart Mortelmans wrote:
Hi all,
When I run the CTRL-command
Delays do indeed make me think of some sort of timeout. But using
127.0.0.1 didn't make a difference...
Op 15-jun-08, om 19:04 heeft decker het volgende geschreven:
Hey,
../CtrlClnt -s localhost -u *** -p ** userlist
test.domain.tld
Just a shot in the dark, is it the same
I did some testing with strace. Running it on CtrlClnt didn't tell me
much, so I started XMail in debug through strace.
As I understand the result correctly, then XMail forks to handle the
CTRL-request. The first files it opens in that fork seem reasonable:
ctrl.ipmap.tab, ctrlaccounts.tab,
Davide Libenzi wrote:
Yep, you're right. There's a common function to load the user info, and
this one fetches the user.tab file too.
I fixed it in the next version by adding a parameter to tell if the caller
wants user.tab info too, when loading it.
Thanks! Looking forward to this new
Dear Davide,
Is this maybe something we can patch ourselves in the code? I would be
very much interested in starting to use this since updates to accounts
are very regular for us.
Thanks!
Sincerely,
Bart Mortelmans
Davide Libenzi schreef:
On Mon, 16 Jun 2008, Bart Mortelmans wrote
!
Bart Mortelmans
Op 7-sep-08, om 20:55 heeft Davide Libenzi het volgende geschreven:
1.26-pre04 is the same of 1.26-pre03, with a bug cirrected
(affecting Unix
version). Because of that bug, message files were sent (via POP3)
with CR
line termination instead of CRLF. I did not notice
/spool -type f -mtime +30 | grep '/mess/' | xargs rm -f
Our mailserver retry shedule should retry sending mails for up to
maximum 7 days, so I assume that any file that has been in there for 30
days isn't being retried anymore. But is it safe to simply delete them?
Thanks!
Bart Mortelmans
information to be able to
investigate this.
Thanks!
Sincerely,
Bart Mortelmans
___
xmail mailing list
xmail@xmailserver.org
http://xmailserver.org/mailman/listinfo/xmail
malformatting the code.
Thanks!
Sincerely,
Bart Mortelmans
On 8-feb-09, at 21:20, Davide Libenzi wrote:
On Sun, 8 Feb 2009, Bart Mortelmans wrote:
Hi,
When using XMail 1.26-Pre05 with redirect in the mailproc.tab to
forward
mails, the header lines that where in the e-mail before
you can figure out what is causing this
Sincerely,
Bart Mortelmans
Davide Libenzi schreef:
On Mon, 9 Feb 2009, Bart Mortelmans wrote:
OK, lets try as attachment ...
That seems to have done the trick! I tested with an e-mail to Hotmail, and
that one did now correctly display
hope this helps you to solve this.
Sincerely,
Bart Mortelmans
On 9-feb-09, at 16:48, Bart Mortelmans wrote:
Hi,
I think there still is a problem somewhere. An other destination
mailserver responds with this (not sure what they're running):
550 Requested action not taken: Nonstandard
On 15-dec-09, at 21:13, Dale wrote:
I haven't actually implemented it. The problem is that I'm not sure
where to put the settings. I'm not sure how to make my lack of
understanding (or stupidity, your choice) any clearer.
I guess the difficult part is that things will actually already
Hi,
Since there is X-AuthUser in the headers, it looks like a username and
password of one of your POP3 clients was used to be able to relay
through your mailserver. If you don't want this, you might want to check
on DefaultSmtpPerms in server.tab.
And I would advice to change the POP3 password
Together with Stefan, I have been looking into what would be needed for
the XMailServer Control Library to be able to talk over TLS. We ended
up creating a small peace of Java as test (didn't include it in
CtrlClnt.jar yet, but that shouldn't be too difficult). If anybody else
needs this, please
be a good thing to do. But if files are
moved in and out of the temp folder instead of being copied there,
this might not be such a good idea. Does anybody have an insight on this?
Sincerely,
Bart Mortelmans
Op 08/09/11 13:26, Rittikorn L schreef:
Update.
If I mount MailRoot folder to storage it can
-address. What am I doing
wrong?
(If anybody asks: I triple checked: real tab in there!)
Thanks!
Sincerely,
Bart Mortelmans
___
xmail mailing list
xmail@xmailserver.org
http://xmailserver.org/mailman/listinfo/xmail
to mailbox.
Sincerely,
Bart Mortelmans
On 15-apr.-2012, at 20:30, md wrote:
Does anybody know how to route all mail not in the white list
into the permanent trash can?
For example, when we send out emails for a newsletter, we want the reply to
address to be: nore...@xmailserver.com
use MAILBOX, you
will be using REDIRECT or something else. But documentation doesn't
say that some sort of default beheaviour will apply of mailproc.tab is
empty. So by not mentioning such a default it somehow does document the
/dev/null behaviour :-)
Sincerely,
Bart Mortelmans
Op 15/04/12 21
Hi,
(could some be only read at start of xmail, don't know, no info in
doc, perhaps server.tab ? in this case I always stop, change, start to be
sure)
server.tab can be changed while xmail is running. After a couple of
seconds xmail will start using the new information (it does take a
little
Spyros Tsiolis schreef op 5/01/14 20:30:
Does XMail support TLS ?
yes
___
xmail mailing list
xmail@xmailserver.org
http://xmailserver.org/mailman/listinfo/xmail
and clamd…
Sincerely,
Bart Mortelmans
___
xmail mailing list
xmail@xmailserver.org
http://xmailserver.org/mailman/listinfo/xmail
. But this
would mean that all mails pending delivery are lost at server restart
(so this isn't really recommended).
Sincerely,
Bart Mortelmans
U.Mutlu via xmail schreef op 25/05/15 om 01:09:
Tip: Speeding up xmail by pointing envvar XMAIL_TEMP to a ramdisk
(here on Linux using a 64 MB ramdisk mounted
-200
emails. So It should be XMAIL SSL problem. Because When I reuse STUNNEL to do a
POP3 tunnel again, the problem will fix.
Original Message
From: Bart Mortelmans b...@bim.be
To: t...@os.st, XMail Users Mailing List xmail@xmailserver.org
Sent: Tue, May 26, 2015, 3:13 PM
Subject: Re
Hi,
The easiest solution probably is putting this in aliases.tab:
“rpzdesign.com”[tab]”*”[tab]”rpzrpzrpzj...@gmail.com”
Obviously replacing [tab] with real tabs. And take into account that this is a
file you can’t edit while XMailserver is running (so turn it off first or use
CtrlClnt to edit
I understand that you can be sure that your checkSmtpAuth.sh is indeed
being called, because you see that the RFILE is created, with the
contents you expect your script to put in there?
In that case my guess is that XMail is having trouble accessing your
RFILE. If the exit code wasn't seen as
37 matches
Mail list logo
