[xmail] Re: MAIL FROM: Syntax
At 17.06 17/02/05 +0100, you wrote: What's a clear response ;-) Thanks Chris ;-) What is the new crypto algo used here ? Didn't pass any crack here ... = ;-) Francis -Message d'origine- De : Chris L. Franklin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Envoy=E9 : jeudi 17 f=E9vrier 2005 14:30 =C0 : xmail@xmailserver.org Objet : [xmail] Re: MAIL FROM: Syntax SW4gdGhpcyBjYXNlIEV4Y2hhbmdlLCB5b3UgY2FuJ3QgaGF2ZSBhICIuIiByaWdodCBuZXh0= IHRv I guess that Chris's message left his MUA with Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit; some piece of software on the route from him to the list decided that 8bit should be converted to base64, but didn't change the header accordingly. This is the outcome ... Ciao, Francesco - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: MAIL FROM: Syntax
SW4gdGhpcyBjYXNlIEV4Y2hhbmdlLCB5b3UgY2FuJ3QgaGF2ZSBhICIuIiByaWdodCBuZXh0IHRv IHRoZSBAIHNpZ24uDQoNCi0tIENocmlzIEwuIEZyYW5rbGluIC0tDQoNCi0tLS0tIE9yaWdpbmFs IE1lc3NhZ2UgLS0tLS0gDQpGcm9tOiAiTWFudWVsIE1hcnRpbiIgPG1hcnRpbkBmZXJiZXItc29m dHdhcmUuZGU+DQpUbzogPHhtYWlsQHhtYWlsc2VydmVyLm9yZz4NClNlbnQ6IFRodXJzZGF5LCBG ZWJydWFyeSAxNywgMjAwNSA0OjI5IEFNDQpTdWJqZWN0OiBbeG1haWxdIE1BSUwgRlJPTTogU3lu dGF4DQoNCg0KPiBIZWxsbyBEYXZpZGUsDQo+IA0KPiBhIGR1bWIgU1BBTW1lciBzZW50IG1lIGEg bWFpbCwgd2hpY2ggd2FzIHJlY2VpdmVkIGJ5IGEgWG1haWwgc2VydmVyIGFuZCA9DQo+IHRoZW4N Cj4gZm9yd2FyZGVkIHRvIGFuIEV4Y2hhbmdlLUJveCAtIHRoYXQgcmVqZWN0ZWQgdGhlIG1lc3Nh Z2UgYmVjYXVzZSBvZiBhbg0KPiBpbnZhbGlkIE1BSUwgRlJPTToNCj4gSGVyZSdzIHRoZSBlcnJv ciBtZXNzYWdlIChwYXJ0cyBvZikNCj4gDQo+IFs8MDA+XSBYTWFpbCBib3VuY2U6IFJjcHQ9M0Rb bXlhZGRyZXNzQG15ZG9tYWluXTtFcnJvcj0zRFs1MDEgNS41LjQgPQ0KPiBJbnZhbGlkDQo+IEFk ZHJlc3NdDQo+IA0KPiANCj4gWzwwMT5dIEVycm9yIHNlbmRpbmcgbWVzc2FnZSBbMTEwODUzMjIx MDYwMC4yNTA4LjcxLm15eG1haWxzZXJ2ZXJdIGZyb20NCj4gW215eG1haWxzZXJ2ZXIubXlkb21h aW5dLg0KPiANCj4gSUQ6ICAgICAgICA8UzkxRD4NCj4gTWFpbCBGcm9tOiA8Q2FzZXkuQG1haWwy d29ybGQuY29tPg0KPiBSY3B0IFRvOiAgIDxteWFkZHJlc3NAbXlkb21haW4+DQo+IFNlcnZlcjog ICAgPGV4Y2hhbmdlc2VydmVyQG15ZG9tYWluPiBbMS4yLjMuNF0NCj4gDQo+IA0KPiBbPDAyPl0g VGhlIHJlYXNvbiBvZiB0aGUgZGVsaXZlcnkgZmFpbHVyZSB3YXM6DQo+IA0KPiA1MDEgNS41LjQg SW52YWxpZCBBZGRyZXNzDQo+IA0KPiBXaG8ncyByaWdodCwgRXhjaGFuZ2Ugb3IgWG1haWw/IDot KQ0KPiANCj4gUmVnYXJkcywgTWFudWVsIE1hcnRpbg0KPiAtDQo+IFRvIHVuc3Vic2NyaWJlIGZy b20gdGhpcyBsaXN0OiBzZW5kIHRoZSBsaW5lICJ1bnN1YnNjcmliZSB4bWFpbCIgaW4NCj4gdGhl IGJvZHkgb2YgYSBtZXNzYWdlIHRvIGVjYXJ0aXNAeG1haWxzZXJ2ZXIub3JnDQo+IEZvciBnZW5l cmFsIGhlbHA6IHNlbmQgdGhlIGxpbmUgImhlbHAiIGluIHRoZSBib2R5IG9mIGEgbWVzc2FnZSB0 bw0KPiBlY2FydGlzQHhtYWlsc2VydmVyLm9yZw0KPiANCj4= - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: MAIL FROM: Syntax
What's a clear response ;-) Thanks Chris ;-) What is the new crypto algo used here ? Didn't pass any crack here ... = ;-) Francis -Message d'origine- De : Chris L. Franklin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Envoy=E9 : jeudi 17 f=E9vrier 2005 14:30 =C0 : xmail@xmailserver.org Objet : [xmail] Re: MAIL FROM: Syntax SW4gdGhpcyBjYXNlIEV4Y2hhbmdlLCB5b3UgY2FuJ3QgaGF2ZSBhICIuIiByaWdodCBuZXh0= IHRv IHRoZSBAIHNpZ24uDQoNCi0tIENocmlzIEwuIEZyYW5rbGluIC0tDQoNCi0tLS0tIE9yaWdp= bmFs IE1lc3NhZ2UgLS0tLS0gDQpGcm9tOiAiTWFudWVsIE1hcnRpbiIgPG1hcnRpbkBmZXJiZXIt= c29m dHdhcmUuZGU+DQpUbzogPHhtYWlsQHhtYWlsc2VydmVyLm9yZz4NClNlbnQ6IFRodXJzZGF5= LCBG ZWJydWFyeSAxNywgMjAwNSA0OjI5IEFNDQpTdWJqZWN0OiBbeG1haWxdIE1BSUwgRlJPTTog= U3lu dGF4DQoNCg0KPiBIZWxsbyBEYXZpZGUsDQo+IA0KPiBhIGR1bWIgU1BBTW1lciBzZW50IG1l= IGEg bWFpbCwgd2hpY2ggd2FzIHJlY2VpdmVkIGJ5IGEgWG1haWwgc2VydmVyIGFuZCA9DQo+IHRo= ZW4N Cj4gZm9yd2FyZGVkIHRvIGFuIEV4Y2hhbmdlLUJveCAtIHRoYXQgcmVqZWN0ZWQgdGhlIG1l= c3Nh Z2UgYmVjYXVzZSBvZiBhbg0KPiBpbnZhbGlkIE1BSUwgRlJPTToNCj4gSGVyZSdzIHRoZSBl= cnJv ciBtZXNzYWdlIChwYXJ0cyBvZikNCj4gDQo+IFs8MDA+XSBYTWFpbCBib3VuY2U6IFJjcHQ9= M0Rb bXlhZGRyZXNzQG15ZG9tYWluXTtFcnJvcj0zRFs1MDEgNS41LjQgPQ0KPiBJbnZhbGlkDQo+= IEFk ZHJlc3NdDQo+IA0KPiANCj4gWzwwMT5dIEVycm9yIHNlbmRpbmcgbWVzc2FnZSBbMTEwODUz= MjIx MDYwMC4yNTA4LjcxLm15eG1haWxzZXJ2ZXJdIGZyb20NCj4gW215eG1haWxzZXJ2ZXIubXlk= b21h aW5dLg0KPiANCj4gSUQ6ICAgICAgICA8UzkxRD4NCj4gTWFpbCBGcm9tOiA8Q2FzZXkuQG1h= aWwy d29ybGQuY29tPg0KPiBSY3B0IFRvOiAgIDxteWFkZHJlc3NAbXlkb21haW4+DQo+IFNlcnZl= cjog ICAgPGV4Y2hhbmdlc2VydmVyQG15ZG9tYWluPiBbMS4yLjMuNF0NCj4gDQo+IA0KPiBbPDAy= Pl0g VGhlIHJlYXNvbiBvZiB0aGUgZGVsaXZlcnkgZmFpbHVyZSB3YXM6DQo+IA0KPiA1MDEgNS41= LjQg SW52YWxpZCBBZGRyZXNzDQo+IA0KPiBXaG8ncyByaWdodCwgRXhjaGFuZ2Ugb3IgWG1haWw/= IDot KQ0KPiANCj4gUmVnYXJkcywgTWFudWVsIE1hcnRpbg0KPiAtDQo+IFRvIHVuc3Vic2NyaWJl= IGZy b20gdGhpcyBsaXN0OiBzZW5kIHRoZSBsaW5lICJ1bnN1YnNjcmliZSB4bWFpbCIgaW4NCj4g= dGhl IGJvZHkgb2YgYSBtZXNzYWdlIHRvIGVjYXJ0aXNAeG1haWxzZXJ2ZXIub3JnDQo+IEZvciBn= ZW5l cmFsIGhlbHA6IHNlbmQgdGhlIGxpbmUgImhlbHAiIGluIHRoZSBib2R5IG9mIGEgbWVzc2Fn= ZSB0 bw0KPiBlY2FydGlzQHhtYWlsc2VydmVyLm9yZw0KPiANCj4=3D - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: MAIL FROM: Syntax
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Thursday, February 17, 2005 5:06 PM: What's a clear response ;-) Thanks Chris ;-) =20 What is the new crypto algo used here ? Didn't pass any crack here ... =3D ;-) It's the new leet base64 crypt algo. They said no one will ever be able to crack it ;-) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: MAIL FROM: Syntax
I have the same problem (?) here .. But for my point of view, this is not really a problem as 99,99% of the = bad emails syntaxes was really bad syntax errors in the mail address ... The real question is : What Smtp RFC's say about email addresses syntax check and to define if xmail or exchange (or the two ?) are in error = (or none if not explicitly mandatory or regulated in RFC's ...) ... I did not find yet the 'good' rfc about this problem ... Francis -Message d'origine- De : Manuel Martin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Envoy=E9 : jeudi 17 f=E9vrier 2005 10:29 =C0 : xmail@xmailserver.org Objet : [xmail] MAIL FROM: Syntax Hello Davide, a dumb SPAMmer sent me a mail, which was received by a Xmail server and = =3D then forwarded to an Exchange-Box - that rejected the message because of an invalid MAIL FROM: Here's the error message (parts of) [00] XMail bounce: [EMAIL PROTECTED];Error=3D3D[501 5.5.4 = =3D Invalid Address] [01] Error sending message [1108532210600.2508.71.myxmailserver] from [myxmailserver.mydomain]. ID:S91D Mail From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Rcpt To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Server:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [1.2.3.4] [02] The reason of the delivery failure was: 501 5.5.4 Invalid Address Who's right, Exchange or Xmail? :-) Regards, Manuel Martin - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: MAIL FROM: Syntax
Are you sure ? Is not it the 'next generation' subspatial-base64 ? or the new semi-bits 64.5 (like semi-conductors) crypto algo ... ;-) I will try to divide by 2 the cpu leads with the cutter ... See you later ... :-) -Message d'origine- De : S=F6nke Ruempler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Envoy=E9 : jeudi 17 f=E9vrier 2005 17:11 =C0 : xmail@xmailserver.org Objet : [xmail] Re: MAIL FROM: Syntax [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Thursday, February 17, 2005 5:06 PM: What's a clear response ;-) Thanks Chris ;-) =3D20 What is the new crypto algo used here ? Didn't pass any crack here ... =3D3D ;-) It's the new leet base64 crypt algo. They said no one will ever be able to crack it ;-) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: MAIL FROM: Syntax
Hello Francis,=20 I have the same problem (?) here .. But for my point of view, this is not really a problem as=20 99,99% of the =3D bad emails syntaxes was really bad syntax errors in the mail address ... usually Xmail rejects them outright, so Exchange may not receive them, = but I already had another Syntax Error. Perhaps Exchange puts in more tests. I had no complaints yet, though. The real question is : What Smtp RFC's say about email=20 addresses syntax check and to define if xmail or exchange (or the two ?) are in error = =3D (or none if not explicitly mandatory or regulated in RFC's ...) ... =20 I did not find yet the 'good' rfc about this problem ... me neither. RFC 822 says something like address =3D word*(. word) but = that's for messages. Regards, Manuel Martin - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: MAIL FROM: Syntax
usually Xmail rejects them outright, so Exchange may not=20 receive them, =3D but I already had another Syntax Error.=20 that should have been another type of syntax error - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: MAIL FROM: Syntax
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005, CLEMENT Francis wrote: I have the same problem (?) here .. But for my point of view, this is not really a problem as 99,99% of the = bad emails syntaxes was really bad syntax errors in the mail address ... The real question is : What Smtp RFC's say about email addresses syntax check and to define if xmail or exchange (or the two ?) are in error = (or none if not explicitly mandatory or regulated in RFC's ...) ... I did not find yet the 'good' rfc about this problem ... XMail is quite permissive with addresses, and this will have to be adressed in the future. - Davide - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
