Re: [xml] Availability of libxm2-2.9.0 release candidate 1

2012-08-10 Thread Michael Ludwig
Daniel Veillard schrieb am 10.08.2012 um 10:42 (+0800): ftp://xmlsoft.org/libxml2/libxml2-2.9.0-rc1.tar.gz Encountering a build error on Cygwin (1.7.16-1): $ ./configure make … Makefile:949: recipe for target `gen_prog' failed Before that, there is: Found 1607 functions in libxml2-api.xml

Re: [xml] Availability of libxm2-2.9.0 release candidate 1

2012-08-10 Thread Stefan Behnel
Daniel Veillard, 10.08.2012 07:21: BTW do you have a git commit for 2.9.0 preparation in lxml now ? I may forward this to the packager for Fedora. Hmm, I'm fixing it up only for lxml 3.0. Due to various changes in the code base, that won't apply directly to the latest 2.3.x, and I'm not sure

Re: [xml] Changing the content of a node

2012-08-10 Thread Michael Ludwig
Marc Tajchman schrieb am 07.06.2012 um 12:53 (+0200): 2: data 3: level1 4: some_text 5: level2 6: level32.5/level3 7: /level2 8: /level1 9: /data Both text and elements as children of level1. This is called mixed content. and I want to modify the content at level1 node, i.e.

Re: [xml] Availability of libxm2-2.9.0 release candidate 1

2012-08-10 Thread Daniel Veillard
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 08:14:32AM +0200, Stefan Behnel wrote: Daniel Veillard, 10.08.2012 07:21: BTW do you have a git commit for 2.9.0 preparation in lxml now ? I may forward this to the packager for Fedora. Hmm, I'm fixing it up only for lxml 3.0. Due to various changes in the code

Re: [xml] Availability of libxm2-2.9.0 release candidate 1

2012-08-10 Thread Daniel Veillard
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 08:01:11AM +0200, Michael Ludwig wrote: Daniel Veillard schrieb am 10.08.2012 um 10:42 (+0800): ftp://xmlsoft.org/libxml2/libxml2-2.9.0-rc1.tar.gz Encountering a build error on Cygwin (1.7.16-1): $ ./configure make … Makefile:949: recipe for target `gen_prog'

Re: [xml] Important: possible incompatible changes ahead for 2.9.0 !

2012-08-10 Thread Daniel Veillard
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 09:32:13AM +0200, Johan Corveleyn wrote: On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 10:17 PM, Johan Corveleyn jcor...@gmail.com wrote: [...] See also this report in the Debian tracker: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=445961 From what I understood of the issue

Re: [xml] Important: possible incompatible changes ahead for 2.9.0 !

2012-08-10 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 9:43 AM, Daniel Veillard veill...@redhat.com wrote: On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 09:32:13AM +0200, Johan Corveleyn wrote: On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 10:17 PM, Johan Corveleyn jcor...@gmail.com wrote: [...] See also this report in the Debian tracker:

Re: [xml] Important: possible incompatible changes ahead for 2.9.0 !

2012-08-10 Thread Daniel Veillard
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 10:03:39AM +0200, Johan Corveleyn wrote: On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 9:43 AM, Daniel Veillard veill...@redhat.com wrote: [...] That said there are ways to get long line numbers stored in adjacent nodes c.f. xmlGetLineNo() But not knowing how you actually use the

[xml] Is it time to update xmlunicode.c?

2012-08-10 Thread Nikolai Weibull
Hi! I noticed that xmlunicode.c is based off of Unicode 4.0.1. Is it time to update it to Unicode 6.1.0? ___ xml mailing list, project page http://xmlsoft.org/ xml@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/xml

Re: [xml] Is it time to update xmlunicode.c?

2012-08-10 Thread Daniel Veillard
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 01:17:59PM +0200, Nikolai Weibull wrote: Hi! Hello Nikolai, I noticed that xmlunicode.c is based off of Unicode 4.0.1. Is it time to update it to Unicode 6.1.0? Good question ! Let's see ... the definition of Unicode affects 2 parts of libxml2: - the core

Re: [xml] Is it time to update xmlunicode.c?

2012-08-10 Thread Liam R E Quin
On Fri, 2012-08-10 at 21:00 +0800, Daniel Veillard wrote: - the XML schemas datatype part driven by http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-2/ . But I wonder if updating is actually right w.r.t. XSD. Honnestly I don't know, One thing would be to try and see what it gives on regression

Re: [xml] Availability of libxm2-2.9.0 release candidate 1

2012-08-10 Thread Roumen Petrov
Daniel Veillard wrote: Following the first rc0 snapshot from last week and after much cleanup and testing, the first release candidate for the next libxml2 release is available at the usual place: ftp://xmlsoft.org/libxml2/libxml2-2.9.0-rc1.tar.gz [SNIP] So please give it a try :-),

Re: [xml] Availability of libxm2-2.9.0 release candidate 1

2012-08-10 Thread Daniel Richard G .
On Fri, 10 Aug 2012, Daniel Veillard wrote: Makefile:949: recipe for target `gen_prog' failed Before that, there is: Found 1607 functions in libxml2-api.xml Found 55 functions in libxml2-python-api.xml Generated 889 wrapper functions, 557 failed, 216 skipped Humpf, thanks for the report.

Re: [xml] Availability of libxm2-2.9.0 release candidate 1

2012-08-10 Thread Daniel Richard G .
On Fri, 10 Aug 2012, Roumen Petrov wrote: - Various make distcheck and portability fixups adds regression . Please see https://mail.gnome.org/archives/xml/2012-August/msg00016.html What was the failure mode here, again? I don't disagree that proper m4 quoting is good practice, but I haven't

Re: [xml] Availability of libxm2-2.9.0 release candidate 1

2012-08-10 Thread Michael Ludwig
Daniel Richard G. schrieb am 10.08.2012 um 16:51 (-0400): Can't reproduce here. It's not a Python-version thing; I can run generator.py just fine with 2.4.4. (To Michael Ludwig: You didn't see a stack trace or anything? Could you poke around generator.py to see why it's returning non-zero?)

Re: [xml] xmllint schema validation reports line numbers above 65535 incorrectly (was: Re: Important: possible incompatible changes ahead for 2.9.0 !)

2012-08-10 Thread Daniel Veillard
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 09:24:56PM +0200, Johan Corveleyn wrote: On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 11:27 AM, Daniel Veillard veill...@redhat.com wrote: On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 10:03:39AM +0200, Johan Corveleyn wrote: On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 9:43 AM, Daniel Veillard veill...@redhat.com wrote: [...]