On Fri, 2012-08-10 at 21:00 +0800, Daniel Veillard wrote:
> - the XML schemas datatype part driven by
> http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-2/
> . But I wonder if updating is actually right w.r.t.
> XSD. Honnestly I don't know, One thing would be to try and see what
> it gives on regression
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 01:17:59PM +0200, Nikolai Weibull wrote:
> Hi!
Hello Nikolai,
> I noticed that xmlunicode.c is based off of Unicode 4.0.1. Is it time
> to update it to Unicode 6.1.0?
Good question !
Let's see ... the definition of Unicode affects 2 parts of libxml2:
- the core
Hi!
I noticed that xmlunicode.c is based off of Unicode 4.0.1. Is it time
to update it to Unicode 6.1.0?
___
xml mailing list, project page http://xmlsoft.org/
xml@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/xml