'Twas brillig, and Marc Balmer at 02/01/09 20:12 did gyre and gimble:
Remember that Matthieu said: I can confirm that he also has experience
on cooperative work and social behaviour... you should try to ensure
that still holds true.
Who are you to talk to me in such voice?
I seriously
On Sat, 3 Jan 2009, Colin Guthrie wrote:
Your reaction clearly showed that you're too intolerant to listen
without resorting to insult. Very grown up.
that last - invariably I suppose that the person making that type of
comment is about 19 years old. (my apologies if my supposition is true).
On Sat, Jan 03, 2009 at 04:21:19AM -0200, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade wrote:
Daniel Stone wrote:
extern _X_EXPORT type-specoptional-newline symbol-name
ignored...
I'm pretty troubled by this. If it's C, then it's C. If it's not C,
then it's not C. Pseudo-C, OTOH ...
I believe
Marc Balmer wrote:
When will
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17271
be taken care of? This is seriously getting ridicoulous.
X.Org looks like a shit show run by amateurs to me.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SaYUqXAmXRQ
___
xorg
The attached patch implements the suggested behavior. I don't think
that this violates the spec.
The question was actually about how the core pointer is reporting events
when they are being replayed after a grab by a different client. Here
is a part of the xev output in this situation:
Vasily Khoruzhick wrote on Wednesday, December 31, 2008 7:14 PM:
On 31 December 2008 08:25:35 Jin, Gordon wrote:
Vasily Khoruzhick wrote on Monday, December 29, 2008 11:52 PM:
On 29 December 2008 15:53:27 Jin, Gordon wrote:
Vasily Khoruzhick wrote on Monday, December 29, 2008 12:32 AM:
Hi,
Using the latest xserver from server-1.6 branch, when
XTestFakeRelativeMotionEvent is called with a delay parameter !=
CurrentTime, the client may crash under certain circumstances. I've
also seen problems with the same symptons on earlier X servers, but I've
never been able to reproduce them.
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/xserver/commit/?id=d21155a3e9b51df946766926bc6155c8972c4439
Here's the correct link to the thread where this was previously discussed:
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xorg/2008-June/035943.html
In current X servers, the button field is a bit mask, so
Sorry, forgot the attachment.
Thomas Jaeger wrote:
The attached patch implements the suggested behavior. I don't think
that this violates the spec.
From c41b2dcfe145022b1a3dba4243ad992e903238f2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Thomas Jaeger thjae...@gmail.com
Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 17:19:55 -0500
m h wrote on Saturday, January 03, 2009 3:34 AM:
Folks -
I'm running intel 2.5.1-r1 (on gentoo) and just noticed that xrandr no
longer lets me resize my LVDS screen. (Very useful when cloning to
projectors that don't match my native resolution of 1680x1050).
Curiously, it still gives me
10 matches
Mail list logo
