Hi all,
with recent Mesa (git from 19.02.2010), xorg server
(git://anongit.freedesktop.org/~krh/xserver dri2-invalidate branch),
xorg-video-intel from 13.02.2010 i have an very postponed output on my
Thinkpad X200t.
in my Xorg.log i see a lot of follow messages:
[3904117.243] (EE) intel(0): F
> You need to adjust the display area of the mode relative to the total.
That is exactly what I have done down to 1064x504 in steps of 8
(from 1280x720).
I even tried the --scale option but that only effects the width (and in
big fragments) not the height.
I try more tomorrow.
Thanks to all so
> Try the autosize button on the TV. If it doesn't have a dedicated button
> for it, find the equivalent in its menus. If it doesn't have that either,
> resize manually.
Oh I wish I could do any of this.
My TV lets me only resize when it runs in PC mode (that is if it is
connected via 15pin vga ca
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 6:39 PM, Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 6:23 PM, Sebastian Beßler
> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 5:01 PM, Sebastian Beßler
>>> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 2:37 PM, Sebastian Beßler
> Some TV's enable overscan by default. Turn off oversca
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 6:23 PM, Sebastian Beßler
wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 5:01 PM, Sebastian Beßler
>> wrote:
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 2:37 PM, Sebastian Beßler
Some TV's enable overscan by default. Turn off overscan on your tv.
The
>>> option might be called "fit" or "ex
On 2010/02/19 20:37 (GMT+0100) Sebastian Beßler composed:
> recently I changed my dual-head setting from fglrx and old zephod to
> xf86-video-ati, KMS and xrandr.
> Nearly all works great, since KDE 4.4 even that, but the display on my
> TFT-TV is a bit too large on all sides so that it doesn't fi
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 4:14 PM, Steffen Schaumburg
wrote:
> One thing that strikes me as odd is that the issue even exists with
> HDMI. What's the point in overscan when you don't have a DA converter?
TV industry refusing to let go of old habits...
Perhaps OP can try this:
http://www.ypass.net
> On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 6:17 PM, Sebastian Beßler
> wrote:
>>> xrandr says:
>>> metat...@shao ~ $ xrandr
>>> Screen 0: minimum 320 x 200, current 2720 x 900, maximum 8192 x 8192
HDMI-0 connected 1280x720+1440+0 (normal left inverted right x axis y
axis) 708mm x 398mm
>>
>> I don't know if it has
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 6:17 PM, Sebastian Beßler
wrote:
>> xrandr says:
>> metat...@shao ~ $ xrandr
>> Screen 0: minimum 320 x 200, current 2720 x 900, maximum 8192 x 8192
>> HDMI-0 connected 1280x720+1440+0 (normal left inverted right x axis y
>> axis) 708mm x 398mm
>
> I don't know if it has so
> On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 5:01 PM, Sebastian Beßler
> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 2:37 PM, Sebastian Beßler
>>> Some TV's enable overscan by default. Turn off overscan on your tv.
>>> The
>> option might be called "fit" or "exact" or something like that. The
>> other alternative is to unde
> xrandr says:
> metat...@shao ~ $ xrandr
> Screen 0: minimum 320 x 200, current 2720 x 900, maximum 8192 x 8192
> HDMI-0 connected 1280x720+1440+0 (normal left inverted right x axis y
> axis) 708mm x 398mm
I don't know if it has something to do with it but my TV is much smaller
than 708mm x 398mm
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 5:01 PM, Sebastian Beßler
wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 2:37 PM, Sebastian Beßler
>> Some TV's enable overscan by default. Turn off overscan on your tv. The
> option might be called "fit" or "exact" or something like that. The
> other alternative is to underscan the mo
On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 07:58:09AM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
> >
> > The elections were one month late according to the latest updated
> > schedule. Right in the middle of FOSDEM preparations too, which i think
> > is a valid excuse from my side for not being able to respond earlier.
> >
> > As bro
>
>> Underscan doesn't seem to help too. I tried down to 1064x504 in steps of 8
>> (from 1280x720) and my TV always seems to compensate.
>>
> Disclaimer: I never did this so my suggestion may be stupid.
> Are you sure you're actually underscanning? Sounds to me like you're
changing the resolution,
>
> The elections were one month late according to the latest updated
> schedule. Right in the middle of FOSDEM preparations too, which i think
> is a valid excuse from my side for not being able to respond earlier.
>
> As brought up before; elections are pretty much the only event where
> anyone g
> Underscan doesn't seem to help too. I tried down to 1064x504 in steps of 8
> (from 1280x720) and my TV always seems to compensate.
>
Disclaimer: I never did this so my suggestion may be stupid.
Are you sure you're actually underscanning? Sounds to me like you're
changing the resolution, I wou
> On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 2:37 PM, Sebastian Beßler
> Some TV's enable overscan by default. Turn off overscan on your tv. The
option might be called "fit" or "exact" or something like that. The
other alternative is to underscan the modeline sent to your
> monitor. Google for "underscan modeline"
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 11:42:17AM -0800, Carl Worth wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Feb 2010 13:03:15 -0500 (EST), Leon Shiman
> wrote:
> > I do not think suggesting that a member just "not vote" is an appropriate
> > response from a Board Member to a legitimate concern about the election.
>
> Fair enoug
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 06:41:43PM +, Daniel Stone wrote:
>
> I meant that, on average, everyone would presumably be happy with the
> board, as it reflects the opinion of everyone who voted. Presumably
> most people who didn't vote don't particularly care about the makeup of
> the board, and
2010/2/19 Tomasz Torcz :
> On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 08:37:13PM +0100, Sebastian Beßler wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> recently I changed my dual-head setting from fglrx and old zephod to
>> xf86-video-ati, KMS and xrandr.
>> Nearly all works great, since KDE 4.4 even that, but the display on my
>> TFT-TV is
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 08:37:13PM +0100, Sebastian Beßler wrote:
> Hello,
>
> recently I changed my dual-head setting from fglrx and old zephod to
> xf86-video-ati, KMS and xrandr.
> Nearly all works great, since KDE 4.4 even that, but the display on my
> TFT-TV is a bit too large on all sides so
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 2:37 PM, Sebastian Beßler
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> recently I changed my dual-head setting from fglrx and old zephod to
> xf86-video-ati, KMS and xrandr.
> Nearly all works great, since KDE 4.4 even that, but the display on my
> TFT-TV is a bit too large on all sides so that it
Hello,
recently I changed my dual-head setting from fglrx and old zephod to
xf86-video-ati, KMS and xrandr.
Nearly all works great, since KDE 4.4 even that, but the display on my
TFT-TV is a bit too large on all sides so that it doesn't fit completely
in. It is only a cm or so on all sides that ov
On Fri, 19 Feb 2010 13:03:15 -0500 (EST), Leon Shiman
wrote:
> I do not think suggesting that a member just "not vote" is an appropriate
> response from a Board Member to a legitimate concern about the election.
Fair enough. I'm definitely not trying to discourage participation.
> Isn't it th
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 07:28:19PM +0100, Luc Verhaegen wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 05:29:14PM +, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 06:01:38PM +0100, Luc Verhaegen wrote:
> > > I believe some things have been asked for already:
> > > * minutes or logs.
> >
> > Bart is collat
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 05:29:14PM +, Daniel Stone wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 06:01:38PM +0100, Luc Verhaegen wrote:
> >
> > I believe some things have been asked for already:
> > * minutes or logs.
>
> Bart is collating his logs, and those will be posted very soon.
>
> > * de
a...@ac13.de wrote:
> I try to send a string to an input field of an application. I think the
> only way is to use the XSendEvent function and send the keycode of every
> single character of my string. But how could I get the special keys like
> shift or alt for characters like '%'?
XKeysymToKey
on Fri, 19 Feb 2010 08:26:30 -0800 Carl Worth wrote:
>
>On Thu, 18 Feb 2010 14:44:11 +0100, Luc Verhaegen wrote:
>> Since voting is officially ending today I have cast my votes just now...
>
>I might make one suggestion regarding this point. If you (and a
>significant number of the general members
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 06:01:38PM +0100, Luc Verhaegen wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 08:26:30AM -0800, Carl Worth wrote:
> > Please, whenever you want more information from the board, please just
> > ask. I can give you my personal assurance that there's no desire on the
> > part of the bo
On Feb 19, 10 17:01:15 +, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > I didn't know it was that much. Now thinking of it I do not remember
> > what we used PayPal for...
>
> Clare College would only accept one large group booking for
> accommodation (and accommodation is ridiculously expensive and generally
> qui
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 05:33:05PM +0100, Matthias Hopf wrote:
> On Feb 18, 10 21:45:07 +, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > As far as I can tell (and I've not looked hard, because I'd like to
> > escape the office early), XDS 2007 cost $US10k for the venue, around
> > $US24k for travel sponsorship
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 08:26:30AM -0800, Carl Worth wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Feb 2010 14:44:11 +0100, Luc Verhaegen wrote:
> > Since voting is officially ending today I have cast my votes just now...
>
> Hi Luc,
>
> I'm glad that you brought some concerns forward.
>
> As a board member, I know that
On Feb 18, 10 17:27:24 -0800, Stephane Marchesin wrote:
> Considering that:
> - there is so much money in the bank (about 3 times what you need for
> XDS 2007, *hint* *hint*),
Which means that 2013 we are out of money :-P
> - giving wide sponsorship makes these conferences better by gathering
> m
On Feb 18, 10 21:45:07 +, Daniel Stone wrote:
> * THIS IS ONLY MY RECOLLECTION FROM A TWO-MINUTE SCAN OF EMAIL. *
> * DO NOT TAKE IT AS GOSPEL, DO NOT RELY UPON IT AS ABSOLUTE TRUTH.*
Thanks for dealing with this so quickly, Daniel!
> As far as I can tell (and I've not looked hard,
On Thu, 18 Feb 2010 14:44:11 +0100, Luc Verhaegen wrote:
> Since voting is officially ending today I have cast my votes just now...
Hi Luc,
I'm glad that you brought some concerns forward.
As a board member, I know that there's nothing better than knowing that
the general membership of the orga
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 9:53 AM, David Sveningsson wrote:
> Hi, is it possible to get a list of supported resolutions for a monitor,
> similar to using xrandr, but even if xorg hasn't been started?
>
> It doesn't matter if it is an existing tool or if it is only possible by
> using some library ro
On 19/02/10 15:47, David Sveningsson wrote:
> On 2010-02-19 16:27, John Tapsell wrote:
>
>> On 19 February 2010 14:53, David Sveningsson wrote:
>>
>>> Hi, is it possible to get a list of supported resolutions for a monitor,
>>> similar to using xrandr, but even if xorg hasn't been start
On 2010-02-19 16:27, John Tapsell wrote:
> On 19 February 2010 14:53, David Sveningsson wrote:
>> Hi, is it possible to get a list of supported resolutions for a monitor,
>> similar to using xrandr, but even if xorg hasn't been started?
>
> sudo apt-get install xresprobe
> sudo ddcprobe | grep ^m
On 19 February 2010 14:53, David Sveningsson wrote:
> Hi, is it possible to get a list of supported resolutions for a monitor,
> similar to using xrandr, but even if xorg hasn't been started?
sudo apt-get install xresprobe
sudo ddcprobe | grep ^mode:
John
___
Hi, is it possible to get a list of supported resolutions for a monitor,
similar to using xrandr, but even if xorg hasn't been started?
It doesn't matter if it is an existing tool or if it is only possible by
using some library routines. I could live with having to start some
subset of xorg as
Hi Egbert,
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 01:13:41AM +0100, Egbert Eich wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 11:18:47PM +, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > I'm pretty uncomfortable with the suggestion here. No, wait, very
> > uncomfortable. (Not to mention that if any misuse of funds _did_ go on
> > here, then
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 05:27:24PM -0800, Stephane Marchesin wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 13:45, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > If you feel this is unacceptable and are looking to assign blame, the
> > mail archives back me up that the entire thing was entirely my idea, and
> > every single cost
On 17-02-10 13:13, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-02-17 at 08:13 +0200, Matthew Fincham wrote:
>
>> On 17-02-10 07:57, Matthew Fincham wrote:
>>
>>> On 16-02-10 17:27, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>>>
>>>
On Tue, 2010-02-16 at 14:17 +0200, Matthew Fincham wrote:
Hello everyone,
I try to send a string to an input field of an application. I think the
only way is to use the XSendEvent function and send the keycode of every
single character of my string. But how could I get the special keys like
shift or alt for characters like '%'?
Regards, André
_
44 matches
Mail list logo
