Re: Intel Graphics package and patch requirments

2009-02-01 Thread Vasily Khoruzhick
On Sunday 01 February 2009 05:45:04 Jin, Gordon wrote: Btw, with EXA and kernel = 2.6.28 I can't get 3D working. glxinfo says that I'm using direct rendering, but ~9fps in quake3 is not hardware accelerated 3D, is it? Maybe you could file a bug with glxinfo output attached. Done, it's bug

RE: Intel Graphics package and patch requirments

2009-01-31 Thread Jin, Gordon
Vasily Khoruzhick wrote on Monday, January 26, 2009 2:57 AM: On 25 January 2009 20:47:13 Halim Issa wrote: Hello, I am trying to follow Intel Graphics Drivers, among others by watching http://intellinuxgraphics.org/2008Q4.html It would seem that in order to get this to work, one is

Re: Intel Graphics package and patch requirments

2009-01-31 Thread Vasily Khoruzhick
On Saturday 31 January 2009 16:38:09 you wrote: It's not surprising that uxa is not stable in 2.6.0 -- it's not the default setting. (we hope uxa would be stabilized in next release) But did you file bugs for your uxa issues? I only see you've filed bug#19738 for the exa performance issue.

Re: Intel Graphics package and patch requirments

2009-01-31 Thread Colin Guthrie
'Twas brillig, and Vasily Khoruzhick at 31/01/09 14:54 did gyre and gimble: On Saturday 31 January 2009 16:38:09 you wrote: It's not surprising that uxa is not stable in 2.6.0 -- it's not the default setting. (we hope uxa would be stabilized in next release) But did you file bugs for your

RE: Intel Graphics package and patch requirments

2009-01-31 Thread Jin, Gordon
Vasily Khoruzhick wrote on Saturday, January 31, 2009 10:55 PM: On Saturday 31 January 2009 16:38:09 you wrote: It's not surprising that uxa is not stable in 2.6.0 -- it's not the default setting. (we hope uxa would be stabilized in next release) But did you file bugs for your uxa issues?

Re: Intel Graphics package and patch requirments

2009-01-25 Thread Vasily Khoruzhick
On 25 January 2009 20:47:13 Halim Issa wrote: Hello, I am trying to follow Intel Graphics Drivers, among others by watching http://intellinuxgraphics.org/2008Q4.html It would seem that in order to get this to work, one is required to patch both mesa (to run intel's mesa branch, not the

Re: Intel Graphics package and patch requirments

2009-01-25 Thread Daniel Gultsch
On Sun, 25 Jan 2009 19:47:13 +0100 Halim Issa yalla...@gmail.com wrote: And finally - is there anywhere a roadmap or todo-list that may show when DisplayPort support might be added to the Intel-drivers? I cant answer the other questions but this one. DisplayPort is already supported. If you do

Re: Intel Graphics package and patch requirments

2009-01-25 Thread Clemens Eisserer
Hi, So, IMO, it's unfair to call 2008Q4 release stable and recommended to ordinary users/OSVs, at least for gma950 users. I have to agree, even 2.6.1 is still far away from release quality. I hope the whole GEM-ification is soon finished, before distributions start deploying that driver. After