Vasily Khoruzhick wrote on Saturday, January 31, 2009 10:55 PM: > On Saturday 31 January 2009 16:38:09 you wrote: > >> It's not surprising that uxa is not stable in 2.6.0 -- it's not the >> default setting. (we hope uxa would be stabilized in next release) >> >> But did you file bugs for your uxa issues? I only see you've filed >> bug#19738 for the exa performance issue. > > Nope, uxa issues for gma950 was fixed in 2.6.1. Bug #19738 is about > dri2 3D performance, not about EXA.
Ah, yes, that bug is about uxa. I just saw you mentioned "with exa it's slow in 3D" in your email. > Btw, with EXA and kernel >= 2.6.28 I can't get 3D working. glxinfo > says that I'm using direct rendering, but ~9fps in quake3 is not > hardware accelerated 3D, is it? Maybe you could file a bug with glxinfo output attached. Thanks Gordon _______________________________________________ xorg mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg
