Hi all,
I am trying to improve my thin client installation.
I have a completely heterogeneous set of (x86-based) thin client
hardware and monitors, which I would like to use interchangeably.
* * *
My current configuration looks like this:
- Both the server and the clients run
2010-06-26 13:51 keltezéssel, Piotr Gluszenia Slawinski írta:
This is all good and well, but thanks to VNC, the graphics performance
is horrible, especially on the bigger screens.
(For example, on my 1600x1200 monitor, I can clearly follow the
full-screen windows refreshing, which is no big
Alex Deucher wrote:
I there any software work-around I could try to test this hypothesis?
You could try the windows driver or fglrx and see if they exhibit the
problem as well.
This is a FireMV card, which is produced for a relatively narrow market
segment, so unfortunately, the
Csillag Kristof wrote:
Alex Deucher wrote:
Could definitely be a problem with the cable,
OK, I am already trying to buy a new cable (these are not easy to get by);
when it gets here, I will check it again.
I tried with the new cables, but unfortunately, the result is the same
Alex Deucher wrote:
/ One naive question: the FireMV 2200 card in question has one DMS-59
/ / slot, which is then divided to two DVI-U ports with a special Y cable.
// I have purchased this Y cable separately, from ebay.
/ /
// Could it be that the problem is with this Y card?
/
Could
highly with bent/broken pins on the splitter.
Chris
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 12:13 AM, Alex Deucher
alexdeuc...@gmail.com mailto:alexdeuc...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/11/12 Csillag Kristof csillag.kris...@united-consult.hu
mailto:csillag.kris...@united-consult.hu
Alex Deucher wrote:
Does adjusting the gamma on the problematic head help?
If I understand your question correctly, you suggest that the gamma
correction function might be off.
I don't think this is the case, because on my monitor, the relation
between (at least) the blue part of the pixel data
Hi all,
I have two identical (Samsung 214T) monitors attached to the two outputs
of a FireMV 2200 PCI card (RV280 based).
I see something strange: there are some colors (mostly from the dark
blue range) which are rendered completely differently by the two
monitors. (One of them does black
Csillag Kristof wrote:
Hi all,
I have two identical (Samsung 214T) monitors attached to the two outputs
of a FireMV 2200 PCI card (RV280 based).
I see something strange: there are some colors (mostly from the dark
blue range) which are rendered completely differently by the two
monitors
Alex Deucher wrote:
Now if only the occasional 1-second blanking would go away...
Does:
Option DisplayPriority HIGH
in the device section of your config help?
No, it definitely does not.
Kristof
___
xorg mailing list
Alex Deucher wrote:
For now, I will go with a dual-head, randr-united configuration of two
1600x1200 monitors connected via DVI to my FireMV card.
Now if only the occasional 1-second blanking would go away...
Does:
Option DisplayPriority HIGH
in the device section of your config
Csillag Kristof wrote:
Furthermore, [...] there were some random red dots scattered on the screen,
appearing and disappearing back to nothingness, really fast.
(Something like static on the TV screen, but only in red,
with fewer artifacts, scattered over the normal image.)
I have changed
Csillag Kristof wrote:
Dave Airlie wrote:
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 7:28 PM, Csillag Kristof
csillag.kris...@united-consult.hu wrote:
I am running a non-KMS system, and zaphod mode on radeon segfaults me.
Here is my xorg.conf and X log, again.
Latest git of -ati
Matt Thrailkill wrote:
On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 4:26 PM, Csillag Kristof
csillag.kris...@united-consult.hu wrote:
3. Is it possible to use arbitrary areas of a running X server as a
back-end server for XDMX, as opposed to the full area of a given X
server? By individually addressing
Dear all,
Please help me assess the general situation. I am trying to get a
multimonitor/multicard setup work with ati cards and the free radeon driver.
Here is my current understanting of how things go. Those with the proper
knowledge/authority, please confirm/correct/deny the following
Dear all,
Since I can not get Xinerama work on my triple-monitor configuration, I
am experimenting with XDMX.
I have had some limited success (have seen an actual big desktop,
spanning all 3 monitors),
but I have a few questions.
1. Is this the right list for XDMX questions? (The binaries are
Section Device
Identifier FireMV 2200-1
BusID PCI:3:6:0
Screen 0
Driver radeon
EndSection
Section Device
Identifier FireMV 2200-2
BusID PCI:3:6:0
Screen 1
Driver
Csillag Kristof wrote:
Alex Deucher wrote:
It's been years since I configured zaphod mode, but you need something
like this:
I have done something like this, and it segfaults.
See the attached config and log.
I realized that at one place of the config, I have written
Alex Deucher wrote:
zaphod rarely gets tested so it tends to be broken periodically on
both the xserver and driver side. Make sure you are using
xf86-video-ati git master as there was a fix for zaphod recently:
forcing digital
output,
despite the analog EDID info, like this:
OptionCustomEDIDDVI-1:/etc/Samsung_214T.edid:digital
At least, it works now.
Kristof
Csillag Kristof wrote:
Adam Jackson wrote:
On Tue, 2009-10-06 at 03:38 +0200, Csillag Kristof wrote
Dear all,
Now that my individual monitors are operational, I would like to create
the following setup:
Monitor 1Monitor 2Monitor 3
(Connected to (Connected to (Connected to
FireMV 2200) RS690M) FireMV2200)
If I don't do anything
here.
Thank you anyway:
Kristof
ps. The FireMV 2400 also contains two different GPUs, so even if it
worked (which it currently does not), you still couldn't configure more
than two monitors into one big desktop without Xinerama.
Timothy S. Nelson wrote:
On Fri, 9 Oct 2009, Csillag Kristof
Dear all,
as a temporary workaround, I am trying to set up the following config:
(from left to right)
Monitor 1 - SyncMaster 214T (with broken DDC) - connected to RS690
Monitor 2 - SyncMaster 205BW - connected to FireMV 2200 PCI
Monitor 3 - SyncMaster 152v - connected to FireMV 2200 PCI
Csillag Kristof wrote:
Dear all,
as a temporary workaround, I am trying to set up the following config:
(from left to right)
Monitor 1 - SyncMaster 214T (with broken DDC) - connected to RS690
Monitor 2 - SyncMaster 205BW - connected to FireMV 2200 PCI
Monitor 3 - SyncMaster 152v
Adam Jackson wrote:
On Wed, 2009-10-07 at 03:35 +0200, Csillag Kristof wrote:
It looks better now, but still, no image on my monitor.
Do you have any other suggestions?
Sure, you're running on the wrong radeon:
(--) PCI:*(0:1:5:0) 1002:791f:103c:302b ATI Technologies Inc RS690M
Adam Jackson írta:
On Wed, 2009-10-07 at 03:35 +0200, Csillag Kristof wrote:
It looks better now, but still, no image on my monitor.
Do you have any other suggestions?
Sure, you're running on the wrong radeon:
(--) PCI:*(0:1:5:0) 1002:791f:103c:302b ATI Technologies Inc RS690M
Adam Jackson wrote:
On Tue, 2009-10-06 at 03:38 +0200, Csillag Kristof wrote:
Therefore, I have extended the syntax of the CustomEDID option to accept
commands after the EDID file name, and implemented one command (digital)
to override this information in the EDID.
I'm going
Alex Deucher wrote:
On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 6:20 PM, Alex Deucher alexdeuc...@gmail.com wrote:
Whoops. try this version.
This time with patch.
This time it works OK.
Kristof
___
xorg mailing list
xorg@lists.freedesktop.org
Dear all,
I have a question about X config/randr/xinerama.
If I have two monitors connected to device 1 (1A and 1B),
and a third monitor connected to device 2 (2A),
how do I configure X to respect the physical layout of the monitors,
which is 1A-2A-1B?
As you see, the monitors are mixed: the
Alex Deucher wrote:
This is likely display watermark or pll related.
What is a display watermark?
Please try xf86-video-ati from git master as that has proper watermark setup
implemented and support for fractional feedback dividers.
I will do this tomorrow; just one question until then:
if
Dave Airlie wrote:
It works for me on a kernel modesetting supported system,
don't think it'll work before KMS or multi-card vga arbiter work.
I am not (yet) familiar with the KMS architecture;
is it possible to implement something like CustomEDID
under KMS?
Kristof
Dear all,
Now that the CustomEDID support is (mostly) in place,
I can force my card to output the proper data,
even when the monitor is connected via DVI.
According to the X log, the selected mode is correct
(ie. it is the same as the mode I get when I connect
via VGA.) The OSD menu of the
Hi all,
I have one more problem with my display:
when viewing some pictures, at some
fixed positions if the images, bright green pixels
appear. These pixels are sometimes flickering
(bright green vs. regular color.)
The pixels move together with the image,
and if I resize the image (ctrl + in my
Dear all,
I am trying to get an Ati FireMV 2400 PCI card to work.
This is a quad-head device, made from two almost-independent
video cards, glued together with some BIOS hack.
* * *
According to the post at
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xorg/2007-March/022328.html
, the card
Csillag Kristof wrote:
This is pure speculation (and I don't have an oscilloscope
to check it ouy), but could it be that the NVIDIA operates
with somewhat higher signal voltages (or sharper signals),
which get through the poor-quality cabling, where the weeker
signals from the radeon get
Hi all,
As I have mentioned a few days earlier, I have encountered a Samsung
214T monitor,
which is unable to properly use DDC when connected via DVI, but works
fine via VGA.
I could not get it to work with the Radeon driver, but the proprietary
NVIDIA driver
had an option to force-feed the
36 matches
Mail list logo
