2009/2/6 Maarten Maathuis:
If you were really seeing a duplicate of a git commit list, then you
would see a whole different picture. For you patches may just be
noise, but that's not the case for everyone.
So ok then, what is the purpose of posting thousands of patches to xorg list?
Cheers,
On 02/06/2009 01:21 PM, Igor Mozolevsky wrote:
2009/2/6 Maarten Maathuis:
If you were really seeing a duplicate of a git commit list, then you
would see a whole different picture. For you patches may just be
noise, but that's not the case for everyone.
So ok then, what is the purpose of
On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 1:21 PM, Igor Mozolevsky i...@hybrid-lab.co.uk wrote:
2009/2/6 Maarten Maathuis:
If you were really seeing a duplicate of a git commit list, then you
would see a whole different picture. For you patches may just be
noise, but that's not the case for everyone.
So ok
2009/2/6 Maarten Maathuis:
It gives people time to check, review and/or complain about patches.
Now that the xorg-devel list was made, it will obviously move there.
I certainly check patches that catch my eye (a small fraction of the
total, i admit).
Does one not submit patches to the
On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 4:21 PM, Igor Mozolevsky i...@hybrid-lab.co.uk wrote:
2009/2/6 Maarten Maathuis:
It gives people time to check, review and/or complain about patches.
Now that the xorg-devel list was made, it will obviously move there.
I certainly check patches that catch my eye (a
Igor Mozolevsky wrote:
2009/2/6 Maarten Maathuis:
It gives people time to check, review and/or complain about patches.
Now that the xorg-devel list was made, it will obviously move there.
I certainly check patches that catch my eye (a small fraction of the
total, i admit).
Does one not
On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 7:21 AM, Igor Mozolevsky i...@hybrid-lab.co.uk wrote:
Does one not submit patches to the maintainer for the sub-project anymore?..
That creates a single point of failure--you are now relying on that
person and that person only to get your patch in. That also does not
give
2009/2/6 William Tracy:
On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 7:21 AM, Igor Mozolevsky i...@hybrid-lab.co.uk wrote:
Does one not submit patches to the maintainer for the sub-project anymore?..
That creates a single point of failure--you are now relying on that
person and that person only to get your patch
On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 12:35 PM, Igor Mozolevsky i...@hybrid-lab.co.uk wrote:
2009/2/6 William Tracy:
On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 7:21 AM, Igor Mozolevsky i...@hybrid-lab.co.uk
wrote:
Does one not submit patches to the maintainer for the sub-project anymore?..
That creates a single point of
On Fri, Feb 06, 2009 at 08:35:02PM +, Igor Mozolevsky wrote:
2009/2/6 William Tracy:
That creates a single point of failure--you are now relying on that
person and that person only to get your patch in. That also does not
give any third parties who might be impacted by your patch a
DS: You appear to have a strange view of what constitutes signal and noise.
I agree. The patch msgs are signal-ish the rest is noise-ish. [1]
Pat
---
[1] unless I am posting a dumb question
___
xorg mailing list
xorg@lists.freedesktop.org
11 matches
Mail list logo
