On Mon, May 13, 2019, 4:00 PM Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Sat, 2019-05-11 at 21:17 +0200, Maarten Maathuis wrote:
> > Given that the xf86-video-intel repo hasn't been been set up for PRs
> > it seems (as opposed to lets say the xserver).
> > I see in https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/xorg/driver/xf86-v
Linux, but I imagine might still be used
in some circumstances.
Anyhow, my original email to intel-gfx, appended here, covers
this in slightly more detail. Any advice on how I should proceed
is welcome. Thanks in advance for any thoughts on this.
Adam
-- Forwarded message -----
Fro
On Sun, May 5, 2019 at 7:18 AM walter harms wrote:
> Am 05.05.2019 09:11, schrieb Matthieu Herrb:
> > On Sat, May 04, 2019 at 03:47:31PM -0700, Adam Richter wrote:
> >> Hi, everyone.
> >>
> >> I would like to propose that whoever has the ability to edit t
Hi, everyone.
I would like to propose that whoever has the ability to edit the web
page add a line like the following to
https://www.x.org/wiki/CodingStyle/ :
- Separate assert(a && b) into assert(a) and assert(b).
I can think of several potential advantages of separating logical conjunctions
i
ks in advance for any further review of this.
Adam
On Thu, May 2, 2019 at 1:02 PM Adam Richter wrote:
>
> Hi.
>
> The attached patch fixes three places in hw/xquartz/darwin.c that
> relied on side effects in assert parameters. That is, they would fail
> if assert() were replace
Hi.
The attached patch fixes three places in hw/xquartz/darwin.c that
relied on side effects in assert parameters. That is, they would fail
if assert() were replaced with a macro that did not evaluate its
parameters.
I would appreciate it if anyone with an appropriate Apple system would
try this
