On Mon, 2012-05-21 at 21:51 -0700, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
No point faking up a reply for remote clients if we never send it to them.
Signed-off-by: Alan Coopersmith alan.coopersm...@oracle.com
Duplicate of http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel/2012-May/030843.html
--
Earthling Michel
On 05/22/12 02:07 AM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Mon, 2012-05-21 at 21:51 -0700, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
No point faking up a reply for remote clients if we never send it to them.
Signed-off-by: Alan Coopersmith alan.coopersm...@oracle.com
Duplicate of
On Die, 2012-05-22 at 08:34 -0700, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
On 05/22/12 02:07 AM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Mon, 2012-05-21 at 21:51 -0700, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
No point faking up a reply for remote clients if we never send it to them.
Signed-off-by: Alan Coopersmith
On 05/22/12 11:37 AM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Die, 2012-05-22 at 08:34 -0700, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
On 05/22/12 02:07 AM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Mon, 2012-05-21 at 21:51 -0700, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
No point faking up a reply for remote clients if we never send it to them.
Alan Coopersmith alan.coopersm...@oracle.com writes:
Keith - are you behind on individual patches vs. pulls or is there something
else wrong with this one?
Sorry; something went awry with my fancy automatic patch queue and I
didn't catch it. I'm tracking patches closely at this point,
No point faking up a reply for remote clients if we never send it to them.
Signed-off-by: Alan Coopersmith alan.coopersm...@oracle.com
---
hw/xfree86/dri2/dri2ext.c |2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/hw/xfree86/dri2/dri2ext.c b/hw/xfree86/dri2/dri2ext.c
index
