Re: [PATCH 0/5] glamor: Fixes ported from the standalone tree

2014-06-08 Thread Eric Anholt
Keith Packard writes: > Michel Dänzer writes: > >> AFAICT these are all the relevant fixes which went into the standalone >> glamor tree since it was imported into the xserver tree. > > We're already a few days overdue for the non-critical bug fix > window, and I'd like to get something merged t

Re: [PATCH 0/5] glamor: Fixes ported from the standalone tree

2014-06-04 Thread Michel Dänzer
On 05.06.2014 14:15, Keith Packard wrote: > Michel Dänzer writes: > >> AFAICT these are all the relevant fixes which went into the standalone >> glamor tree since it was imported into the xserver tree. > > We're already a few days overdue for the non-critical bug fix > window, and I'd like to ge

Re: [PATCH 0/5] glamor: Fixes ported from the standalone tree

2014-06-04 Thread Keith Packard
Michel Dänzer writes: > AFAICT these are all the relevant fixes which went into the standalone > glamor tree since it was imported into the xserver tree. We're already a few days overdue for the non-critical bug fix window, and I'd like to get something merged that makes Radeon useful with in-tr

Re: [PATCH 0/5] glamor: Fixes ported from the standalone tree

2014-04-23 Thread Keith Packard
Eric Anholt writes: > Anyone want to do a review of keithp's copy_area? It sounds like it's a > priority for some of you, and I'd like to see someone that has a GL with > NV_texture_barrier take a good look at it. I've pushed an updated version of that which does a bounding-box overlap check on

Re: [PATCH 0/5] glamor: Fixes ported from the standalone tree

2014-04-23 Thread Eric Anholt
Anthony Waters writes: > Patch 4 and 5 can be dropped, I looked at Keith's code and it does the same > thing already (also tested OpenTTD and it works with Keith's code). Patch > 1 is still valid. I'm currently running xts against the following glamor-fixes set: glamor-gl-context-2 keithp's re

Re: [PATCH 0/5] glamor: Fixes ported from the standalone tree

2014-04-23 Thread Anthony Waters
Patch 4 and 5 can be dropped, I looked at Keith's code and it does the same thing already (also tested OpenTTD and it works with Keith's code). Patch 1 is still valid. On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 5:54 AM, Michel Dänzer wrote: > AFAICT these are all the relevant fixes which went into the standalone

[PATCH 0/5] glamor: Fixes ported from the standalone tree

2014-04-23 Thread Michel Dänzer
AFAICT these are all the relevant fixes which went into the standalone glamor tree since it was imported into the xserver tree. Patch 4 involves changes to the PutImage path which conflict with Keith's pending rework of that, but the other parts of it are required for patch 5 AFAICT. Patch 5 in tu