Re: [PATCH xserver] configure.ac: bump epoxy requirement to 1.2

2016-10-27 Thread Emil Velikov
On 26 October 2016 at 17:13, Adam Jackson wrote: > On Wed, 2016-10-26 at 11:29 +0100, Emil Velikov wrote: > >> Maybe coffee hasn't kicked in, but it does seem to matter. > > I did not misspeak, I promise. > Eek, you're right. Me runs off to find a brown paper bag. Thanks Emil

Re: [PATCH xserver] configure.ac: bump epoxy requirement to 1.2

2016-10-27 Thread Adam Jackson
On Mon, 2016-10-24 at 12:19 -0700, Matt Turner wrote: > On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 2:39 AM, Emil Velikov > wrote: > > > > From: Emil Velikov > > > > As pointed out in the ABI tracker[1], epoxy has gone through a few > > non-backwards

Re: [PATCH xserver] configure.ac: bump epoxy requirement to 1.2

2016-10-26 Thread Adam Jackson
On Wed, 2016-10-26 at 11:29 +0100, Emil Velikov wrote: > Maybe coffee hasn't kicked in, but it does seem to matter. I did not misspeak, I promise. > Think about: build against pre 1.2 [epoxy] then run against 1.2 or > later and you'll get some lovely fireworks.

Re: [PATCH xserver] configure.ac: bump epoxy requirement to 1.2

2016-10-26 Thread Emil Velikov
On 25 October 2016 at 15:59, Adam Jackson wrote: > On Mon, 2016-10-24 at 12:19 -0700, Matt Turner wrote: >> On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 2:39 AM, Emil Velikov >> wrote: >> > > > From: Emil Velikov >> > >> > As pointed out in the

Re: [PATCH xserver] configure.ac: bump epoxy requirement to 1.2

2016-10-25 Thread Adam Jackson
On Tue, 2016-10-25 at 08:50 -0700, Eric Anholt wrote: > I've said it before a couple of times, but it stands: The next step for > epoxy is that someone needs to look into YaronCT's fork and decide if we > should just bless it as the maintained upstream. Just read through the diff between your

Re: [PATCH xserver] configure.ac: bump epoxy requirement to 1.2

2016-10-25 Thread Eric Anholt
Adam Jackson writes: > On Mon, 2016-10-24 at 12:19 -0700, Matt Turner wrote: >> On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 2:39 AM, Emil Velikov >> wrote: >> > > > From: Emil Velikov >> > >> > As pointed out in the ABI tracker[1], epoxy has

Re: [PATCH xserver] configure.ac: bump epoxy requirement to 1.2

2016-10-24 Thread Matt Turner
On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 2:39 AM, Emil Velikov wrote: > From: Emil Velikov > > As pointed out in the ABI tracker[1], epoxy has gone through a few > non-backwards compatible ABI changes, yet preserved the DSO name. > > Most noticeable of which,

[PATCH xserver] configure.ac: bump epoxy requirement to 1.2

2016-10-24 Thread Emil Velikov
From: Emil Velikov As pointed out in the ABI tracker[1], epoxy has gone through a few non-backwards compatible ABI changes, yet preserved the DSO name. Most noticeable of which, from xserver POV, in epoxy_has_egl_extension() - s/EGLDisplay */EGLDisplay/. To avoid