On 26 October 2016 at 17:13, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-10-26 at 11:29 +0100, Emil Velikov wrote:
>
>> Maybe coffee hasn't kicked in, but it does seem to matter.
>
> I did not misspeak, I promise.
>
Eek, you're right. Me runs off to find a brown paper bag.
Thanks
Emil
On Mon, 2016-10-24 at 12:19 -0700, Matt Turner wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 2:39 AM, Emil Velikov
> wrote:
> > > > From: Emil Velikov
> >
> > As pointed out in the ABI tracker[1], epoxy has gone through a few
> > non-backwards
On Wed, 2016-10-26 at 11:29 +0100, Emil Velikov wrote:
> Maybe coffee hasn't kicked in, but it does seem to matter.
I did not misspeak, I promise.
> Think about: build against pre 1.2 [epoxy] then run against 1.2 or
> later and you'll get some lovely fireworks.
On 25 October 2016 at 15:59, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-10-24 at 12:19 -0700, Matt Turner wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 2:39 AM, Emil Velikov
>> wrote:
>> > > > From: Emil Velikov
>> >
>> > As pointed out in the
On Tue, 2016-10-25 at 08:50 -0700, Eric Anholt wrote:
> I've said it before a couple of times, but it stands: The next step for
> epoxy is that someone needs to look into YaronCT's fork and decide if we
> should just bless it as the maintained upstream.
Just read through the diff between your
Adam Jackson writes:
> On Mon, 2016-10-24 at 12:19 -0700, Matt Turner wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 2:39 AM, Emil Velikov
>> wrote:
>> > > > From: Emil Velikov
>> >
>> > As pointed out in the ABI tracker[1], epoxy has
On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 2:39 AM, Emil Velikov wrote:
> From: Emil Velikov
>
> As pointed out in the ABI tracker[1], epoxy has gone through a few
> non-backwards compatible ABI changes, yet preserved the DSO name.
>
> Most noticeable of which,
From: Emil Velikov
As pointed out in the ABI tracker[1], epoxy has gone through a few
non-backwards compatible ABI changes, yet preserved the DSO name.
Most noticeable of which, from xserver POV, in epoxy_has_egl_extension()
- s/EGLDisplay */EGLDisplay/.
To avoid