Re: [RFC xserver 0/3] Allow XWM to control Xwayland commits

2016-12-07 Thread Adam Jackson
On Wed, 2016-12-07 at 12:49 +0200, Pekka Paalanen wrote: > nice! Should I take only the property stuff, or should I try to > learn and integrate everything you have there? > > I suppose I should start with only the property stuff and make my > mechanism work with that first. I guess I should

Re: [RFC xserver 0/3] Allow XWM to control Xwayland commits

2016-12-07 Thread Pekka Paalanen
On Mon, 05 Dec 2016 16:43:24 -0500 Adam Jackson wrote: > (apologies for being so slow to get to this thread, this is great stuff) > > On Mon, 2016-11-28 at 15:47 +0200, Pekka Paalanen wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > having read the above two specs, it is very much not obvious how to >

Re: [RFC xserver 0/3] Allow XWM to control Xwayland commits

2016-12-05 Thread Olivier Fourdan
Hey On 5 December 2016 at 22:43, Adam Jackson wrote: > (apologies for being so slow to get to this thread, this is great stuff) > > On Mon, 2016-11-28 at 15:47 +0200, Pekka Paalanen wrote: > [...] > > > Mind, I am mostly thinking this in Weston XWM terms, which draws the > >

Re: [RFC xserver 0/3] Allow XWM to control Xwayland commits

2016-12-05 Thread Adam Jackson
(apologies for being so slow to get to this thread, this is great stuff) On Mon, 2016-11-28 at 15:47 +0200, Pekka Paalanen wrote: > Hi, > > having read the above two specs, it is very much not obvious how to > connect all the dots. It needs experimenting. > > Would it be acceptable to build

Re: [RFC xserver 0/3] Allow XWM to control Xwayland commits

2016-12-01 Thread Owen Taylor
Probably a combination of factors: * It never got into the official spec (I didn't want to push it in without some review and hopefully a second implementation) * It requires coordinated window manager and toolkit changes to get any benefit * The original spec fixed a huge problem with opaque

Re: [RFC xserver 0/3] Allow XWM to control Xwayland commits

2016-12-01 Thread Pekka Paalanen
On Wed, 30 Nov 2016 15:12:54 -0500 Owen Taylor wrote: > Hi Pekka, > > I don't have a lot of of commentary to add here. Certainly getting the > frame-sync protocols right does require integration between Xwayland and > the compositing manager. I don't think there's that

Re: [RFC xserver 0/3] Allow XWM to control Xwayland commits

2016-11-30 Thread Owen Taylor
Hi Pekka, I don't have a lot of of commentary to add here. Certainly getting the frame-sync protocols right does require integration between Xwayland and the compositing manager. I don't think there's that much virtue in spending time on the extended version of the sync protocol and

Re: [RFC xserver 0/3] Allow XWM to control Xwayland commits

2016-11-28 Thread Pekka Paalanen
On Fri, 25 Nov 2016 12:30:18 +0200 Pekka Paalanen wrote: > On Fri, 25 Nov 2016 03:47:56 -0500 (EST) > Olivier Fourdan wrote: > > > Hi Pekka, > > > > > this is probably the first time I'm sending patches for the xserver, so > > > pointing out API

Re: [RFC xserver 0/3] Allow XWM to control Xwayland commits

2016-11-25 Thread Olivier Fourdan
Hi Pekka, > this is probably the first time I'm sending patches for the xserver, so > pointing out API misuse, coding style issues etc. would be appreciated. The > last patch also has some XXX comments with questions. > > The first patch, refactoring, is not absolutely necessary (anymore - I

[RFC xserver 0/3] Allow XWM to control Xwayland commits

2016-11-24 Thread Pekka Paalanen
From: Pekka Paalanen Hi, this is probably the first time I'm sending patches for the xserver, so pointing out API misuse, coding style issues etc. would be appreciated. The last patch also has some XXX comments with questions. The first patch, refactoring, is