On Wed, 2016-12-07 at 12:49 +0200, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> nice! Should I take only the property stuff, or should I try to
> learn and integrate everything you have there?
>
> I suppose I should start with only the property stuff and make my
> mechanism work with that first.
I guess I should
On Mon, 05 Dec 2016 16:43:24 -0500
Adam Jackson wrote:
> (apologies for being so slow to get to this thread, this is great stuff)
>
> On Mon, 2016-11-28 at 15:47 +0200, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > having read the above two specs, it is very much not obvious how to
>
Hey
On 5 December 2016 at 22:43, Adam Jackson wrote:
> (apologies for being so slow to get to this thread, this is great stuff)
>
> On Mon, 2016-11-28 at 15:47 +0200, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> [...]
>
> > Mind, I am mostly thinking this in Weston XWM terms, which draws the
> >
(apologies for being so slow to get to this thread, this is great stuff)
On Mon, 2016-11-28 at 15:47 +0200, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> having read the above two specs, it is very much not obvious how to
> connect all the dots. It needs experimenting.
>
> Would it be acceptable to build
Probably a combination of factors:
* It never got into the official spec (I didn't want to push it in without
some review and hopefully a second implementation)
* It requires coordinated window manager and toolkit changes to get any
benefit
* The original spec fixed a huge problem with opaque
On Wed, 30 Nov 2016 15:12:54 -0500
Owen Taylor wrote:
> Hi Pekka,
>
> I don't have a lot of of commentary to add here. Certainly getting the
> frame-sync protocols right does require integration between Xwayland and
> the compositing manager. I don't think there's that
Hi Pekka,
I don't have a lot of of commentary to add here. Certainly getting the
frame-sync protocols right does require integration between Xwayland and
the compositing manager. I don't think there's that much virtue in spending
time on the extended version of the sync protocol and
On Fri, 25 Nov 2016 12:30:18 +0200
Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Nov 2016 03:47:56 -0500 (EST)
> Olivier Fourdan wrote:
>
> > Hi Pekka,
> >
> > > this is probably the first time I'm sending patches for the xserver, so
> > > pointing out API
Hi Pekka,
> this is probably the first time I'm sending patches for the xserver, so
> pointing out API misuse, coding style issues etc. would be appreciated. The
> last patch also has some XXX comments with questions.
>
> The first patch, refactoring, is not absolutely necessary (anymore - I
From: Pekka Paalanen
Hi,
this is probably the first time I'm sending patches for the xserver, so
pointing out API misuse, coding style issues etc. would be appreciated. The
last patch also has some XXX comments with questions.
The first patch, refactoring, is
10 matches
Mail list logo