On 5/14/12 12:40 PM, Dave Airlie wrote:
The screen/scrninfo APIs are very into passing index values, that
are then immediately used to lookup a global array, this is not
an API, its whatever the opposite is.
This set of patches changes all the API passing of screen indices
(apart from the
On 05/15/12 02:10 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
There's a lot of cleanup material if anyone really wanted to go after it after
this, 4/19 for example I think we could drop FreeScreen from the ScrnInfoRec
entirely with only modest driver fixups.
Not for Dave's series, but I've always dreamed of
On 5/15/12 5:33 PM, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
On 05/15/12 02:10 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
There's a lot of cleanup material if anyone really wanted to go after it after
this, 4/19 for example I think we could drop FreeScreen from the ScrnInfoRec
entirely with only modest driver fixups.
Not for
The screen/scrninfo APIs are very into passing index values, that
are then immediately used to lookup a global array, this is not
an API, its whatever the opposite is.
This set of patches changes all the API passing of screen indices
(apart from the logging functions). It seriously breaks the
On 05/14/12 09:40 AM, Dave Airlie wrote:
The screen/scrninfo APIs are very into passing index values, that
are then immediately used to lookup a global array, this is not
an API, its whatever the opposite is.
This set of patches changes all the API passing of screen indices
(apart from the
On 05/14/2012 02:25 PM, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
On 05/14/12 09:40 AM, Dave Airlie wrote:
The screen/scrninfo APIs are very into passing index values, that
are then immediately used to lookup a global array, this is not
an API, its whatever the opposite is.
This set of patches changes all the