first) because 1400x1050
is nearest to 1680x1050 anyway.
This patch changes the heuristic to only align resolution vertically if the
displays are horizontally aligned, or vice versa.
Signed-off-by: Florian Mickler flor...@mickler.org
---
Ok, Adam... seems I lost the staring contest... :)
What
On Wed, 01 Jun 2011 15:30:03 -0400
Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com wrote:
On 6/1/11 6:06 AM, Florian Mickler wrote:
Recently the kernel started reporting my outputs in a different ordering
due to
commit cb0953d734
(drm/i915: Initialize LVDS and eDP outputs before anything else
On Wed, 01 Jun 2011 16:48:30 -0400
Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com wrote:
On 6/1/11 4:44 PM, Florian Mickler wrote:
I think using horizontal spanning as a default is a good idea.
Also bringing all outputs up in their preferred mode could be the right
move.
[That commit in question
On Sun, 18 Apr 2010 19:30:31 +0200
Dirk Wallenstein hals...@t-online.de wrote:
A full-fledged meta-git repo management tool suite would be nice. Such
an application would, for example, be able to:
- inform about the state of the modules (dirty, ahead of origin/master,
not on master, etc)
-
On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 16:47:27 +0200
Luc Verhaegen l...@skynet.be wrote:
On Fri, Apr 09, 2010 at 11:43:52AM +0200, Florian Mickler wrote:
On Fri, 9 Apr 2010 09:45:01 +0200
Luc Verhaegen l...@skynet.be wrote:
is this a valid concern?
Definitely.
I'm not so sure. See below.
what
On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 23:10:12 +0200
Florian Mickler flor...@mickler.org wrote:
if there is no other way to find these dependencies than to rely on the
package-dependencies, i would say indeed. this proposed change does not
help me at all.
and here comes the addendum:
proto changes
On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 16:00:32 +0200
Luc Verhaegen l...@skynet.be wrote:
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 06:21:01AM -0700, Dan Nicholson wrote:
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 9:58 PM, Keith Packard kei...@keithp.com wrote:
Looks like comments on the xproto package have tapered off; I'll give
everyone
On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 18:49:56 -0700
Keith Packard kei...@keithp.com wrote:
On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 18:14:33 +0200, Michel Dänzer mic...@daenzer.net wrote:
This seems inconsistent with the usage of this tag in the Linux kernel
development process. If we're going to continue shoehorning our
On Fri, 9 Apr 2010 09:45:01 +0200
Luc Verhaegen l...@skynet.be wrote:
But don't the protocol headers each have packages depending on them
separately, so that an update of the amalgamut triggers an update of
many of the packages above the protocol header amalgamut?
is this a valid concern?
Hi,
xf86RandRModeConvert(pScrn, randr_mode, mode);
xf86SetModeCrtc(mode, scrn-adjustFlags); (DisplayModePtr mode, int
adjustFlags)
mode-CrtcX = mode-X; (not Flags)
xf86RandR12CrtcNotify()
RRCrtcNotify(randr_crtc, randr_mode, x, y, ...)
crtc-mode = mode;
RRCrtcChanged(crtc,
On Mon, 1 Mar 2010 11:51:31 +1000
Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net wrote:
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 08:04:57PM -0800, Keith Packard wrote:
On Thu, 25 Feb 2010 12:49:21 +1000, Peter Hutterer
peter.hutte...@who-t.net wrote:
Bonus point - CheckPassiveGrabsOnWindows suddenly becomes
.
in your xf86-video-intel tree?
yes. before that, glxgears wouldn't ever start ... the error goes away if i
restart the xserver...
Am Dienstag, den 02.03.2010, 22:48 +0100 schrieb Florian Mickler:
On Tue, 2 Mar 2010 11:50:05 -0800
Jesse Barnes jbar...@virtuousgeek.org wrote:
So the server
On Wed, 03 Mar 2010 12:31:24 +0100
Francisco Jerez curroje...@riseup.net wrote:
Florian Mickler flor...@mickler.org writes:
[...]
p.s.: my software stack is git master of libdrm, mesa
and xf86-video-intel as well as xserver-master + krh's pull request, so
that it looks light
On Tue, 2 Mar 2010 09:32:57 -0800
Jamey Sharp ja...@minilop.net wrote:
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 4:37 AM, Stephan Raue mailingli...@openelec.tv wrote:
i have problems running an Application that depends on Mesa. It seems there
is an loop after starting this App and before the GUI loads. I use
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 18:05:06 -0500 (EST)
Thomas Dickey dic...@his.com wrote:
The reason for xfs was to move the computation and I/O off to the server,
which might be far away, reducing both. Client-side font-rendering
doesn't appear to solve that problem. Rather than discussing technology,
On Thu, 3 Dec 2009 16:38:45 +0100 (CET)
Vincent Torri vto...@univ-evry.fr wrote:
On Thu, 3 Dec 2009, Arnaud Mouiche wrote:
I think gtkperf is more a tool to test gtk non-regression or optimization
(on
a same X server), than a tool to test X.
I tried to use it to see if EXA
Hi,
the xclock build fails currently with a checkout failure[1]:
git checkout origin/master
fatal: Untracked working tree file 'INSTALL' would be overwritten by
merge.
i don't know what git commands the tinderbox-script uses, but maybe
one of :
a) git clean -dqfx
b) git checkout --force
On Thu, 24 Sep 2009 09:19:33 -0700
Alan Coopersmith alan.coopersm...@sun.com wrote:
The AM_SILENT_RULES macro in automake 1.11 should be setting
AM_DEFAULT_VERBOSITY already. In my installation it's in
/usr/share/aclocal-1.11/silent.m4 :
case $enable_silent_rules in
yes)
On Thu, 24 Sep 2009 13:37:19 -0700
Alan Coopersmith alan.coopersm...@sun.com wrote:
If it's selecting automake 1.10.2 then the check for AM_SILENT_RULES
being defined should report that it's not and that section of the
Makefile.am should be commented out. I think we'll need to get
someone
Hi!
I'm seeing a (minor) focus issue too, but i think it is not the
same issue you are expiriencing.
my (minor) focus issue is with the mouse, not responding to clicks. but
pressing a keyboard-key fixes the issue for me. the
first pressed key also get's lost.
anyway, while i read through
your
On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 15:38:38 -0400
Gerry Reno gr...@verizon.net wrote:
Users killing their X server with Ctrl-Alt-Backspace is not by any
means a rare occurence. We all wish it were. And in the total tens
of millions of worldwide installations, the use for that purpose, far
outweighs any
21 matches
Mail list logo
