of the results you
posted, which should be much more likely now.
@Keith: Please see below.
Cheers,
Simon
[0] If you bcc'ed people, please just ignore this.
On 04/27/2011 11:36 PM, Ian Pilcher wrote:
On 04/27/2011 10:12 AM, Ian Pilcher wrote:
On 04/27/2011 10:00 AM, Mario Kleiner wrote
On 04/23/2011 09:25 PM, Ian Pilcher wrote:
If there's a different iteration of the patch that you would like me to
test, please point me to it. Otherwise, I would urge you to get this
thing pushed.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35452
Anybody out there?
What is needed to get
patches in the second thread are just the patch from the first
thread split in two, right?
--
Ian Pilcher arequip...@gmail.com
If you're going to shift my paradigm ... at least buy me
On 04/27/2011 10:45 AM, Mario Kleiner wrote:
No, Keith patch is more efficient. It avoids walking parts of the window
tree.
OK. I will test with that patch and post post back.
--
Ian Pilcher
On 04/27/2011 10:12 AM, Ian Pilcher wrote:
On 04/27/2011 10:00 AM, Mario Kleiner wrote:
Original thread was this, between Michel and Keith:
http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel/2011-March/020716.html
The refined patch of Keith that needs testing:
http://www.mail-archive.com/xorg-devel
.
--
Ian Pilcher arequip...@gmail.com
If you're going to shift my paradigm ... at least buy me dinner first
