On 2010-04-12 16:25, Tiago Vignatti wrote:
Jamey Sharp wrote:
I re-ran performance tests when we switched to the socket handoff API,
and my results showed very little difference between libX11 built with
and without XCB. I think that testing was with a simple application that
sends
On Fri, Apr 09, 2010 at 11:36:55AM -0700, Jamey Sharp wrote:
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 10:58 AM, Jeremy Huddleston
jerem...@freedesktop.org wrote:
So what is the general recommendation at this point for how to ship
libX11? I'm still shipping a build --without-xcb mainly because we
wanted to
On Sat, 10 Apr 2010, Jamey Sharp wrote:
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 2:49 PM, Timo Aaltonen timo.aalto...@aalto.fi wrote:
On Fri, 9 Apr 2010, Jamey Sharp wrote:
I may not have a complete picture of support issues, though. Ubuntu
apparently fails to send XCB-related bug reports upstream, for
Le 09/04/2010 20:36, Jamey Sharp a écrit :
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 10:58 AM, Jeremy Huddleston
jerem...@freedesktop.org wrote:
So what is the general recommendation at this point for how to ship
libX11? I'm still shipping a build --without-xcb mainly because we
wanted to play it safe during
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 10:58 AM, Jeremy Huddleston
jerem...@freedesktop.org wrote:
So what is the general recommendation at this point for how to ship
libX11? I'm still shipping a build --without-xcb mainly because we
wanted to play it safe during xcb's infancy.
I'm curious to hear from
Jamey Sharp wrote:
I'm curious to hear from packagers myself. I think most packagers are
building --with-xcb at this point, on Linux, BSD, and Solaris? I don't
know though.
Solaris 10 and older are still X11R6 libX11, so no xcb in them.
For OpenSolaris and the next Solaris release, we're
On Fri, Apr 09, 2010 at 11:36:55AM -0700, Jamey Sharp wrote:
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 10:58 AM, Jeremy Huddleston
jerem...@freedesktop.org wrote:
So what is the general recommendation at this point for how to ship
libX11? I'm still shipping a build --without-xcb mainly because we
wanted to
On 2010-04-09 13:36, Jamey Sharp wrote:
I'm curious to hear from packagers myself. I think most packagers are
building --with-xcb at this point, on Linux, BSD, and Solaris? I don't
know though.
Cygwin has shipped libX11 --with-xcb since X11R7.4.
Yaakov
Cygwin/X
On Fri, 9 Apr 2010, Jamey Sharp wrote:
I may not have a complete picture of support issues, though. Ubuntu
apparently fails to send XCB-related bug reports upstream, for example,
and naturally I can't tell if other distros are failing the same way.
Is this upstream enough?
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 2:49 PM, Timo Aaltonen timo.aalto...@aalto.fi wrote:
On Fri, 9 Apr 2010, Jamey Sharp wrote:
I may not have a complete picture of support issues, though. Ubuntu
apparently fails to send XCB-related bug reports upstream, for example,
and naturally I can't tell if other
10 matches
Mail list logo
