On 09/13/2016 12:40 PM, Immi Halupczok wrote:
> I guess the different-xournal-versions-using-same-config-file is the
> strongest argument I have (unless one also counts "I'm horrified of
> 1,5", which probably is my real motivation ;-) ). If you think that
> argument is not strong enough, then let'
On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 9:40 AM, Immi Halupczok wrote:
>
> (Of course, now it's done: there are different xournal versions with
> incompatible config files; however, one could reduce the impact if newer
> xournal versions are compatible to old ones again.)
At least that is in the config :)
Co
Am 13.09.2016 um 17:32 schrieb Denis Auroux:
> Hi Immi,
>
> Yes, this is hideous, I agree. The issue at this point is backwards
> compatibility -- existing xournal users have .config files with
> locale-dependent numeric data in it and we'd like to be able to read
> them even if they upgrade to a
Hi Immi,
Yes, this is hideous, I agree. The issue at this point is backwards
compatibility -- existing xournal users have .config files with
locale-dependent numeric data in it and we'd like to be able to read
them even if they upgrade to a future version that's better about
storing data in th
