Re: [Xpert]Fixing XF86VidMode extension

2002-01-07 Thread Mike
Sottek, Matthew J <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >[...] >works most of the time. Allowing user defined modelines in XF86Config >is bad enough, but having Apps insert modelines on the fly is really >[...] Yes but Xmame users need these user defined modelines and it wouldn't be worth us running X if

Re: [Xpert]Fixing XF86VidMode extension

2002-01-04 Thread 'Billy Biggs'
Sottek, Matthew J ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > Let me summarize the options you've discussed and comment on each. Matt! Great summary of the options. > Assume 59.94 video. Let's assume true 59.94 video, no 3:2 pulldown or other conversions, and I want to display the full motion or better. Play

RE: [Xpert]Fixing XF86VidMode extension

2002-01-04 Thread Sottek, Matthew J
Let me summarize the options you've discussed and comment on each. Assume 59.94 video. Option 1: Run the display at 59.94. This is what you were attempting to do by inserting modelines I presume? Using this method you don't introduce any more judder than already existed in the video sequence. T

Re: [Xpert]Fixing XF86VidMode extension

2002-01-04 Thread Billy Biggs
Sottek, Matthew J ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > I understand why you are trying to generate the modelines on the fly, > but I really think this is a bad idea. [...] I actually have a flat > panel (Analog input) at home that is sooo finicky with timings that I > have to have them exactly as expected or

[Xpert]Fixing XF86VidMode extension

2002-01-04 Thread Billy Biggs
Over the holidays I fixed XF86VidModeAddModeLine and XF86VidModeSwitchToMode in my local copy of 4_1-branch. My patch though is very strange and not entirely correct. I don't believe the current CVS code ever worked for anyone: I felt I was completing the code rather than bugfixing it. That