On Fri, 16 Nov 2001, Corvin Zahn wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Nov 2001, Mark Vojkovich wrote:
>
> > "XV_VIDEO_STATUS" is sort of ambiguous. A name that more obviously
> > implies its function seems more appropriate. Maybe
> > "XV_PORT_SIGNAL_DETECTED" or "XV_PORT_DATA_EXISTS" but that's a bit long.
>
On Thu, 15 Nov 2001, Mark Vojkovich wrote:
> "XV_VIDEO_STATUS" is sort of ambiguous. A name that more obviously
> implies its function seems more appropriate. Maybe
> "XV_PORT_SIGNAL_DETECTED" or "XV_PORT_DATA_EXISTS" but that's a bit long.
You are right. "XV_SIGNAL_PRESENT"?
Corvin
--
Co
On Thu, 15 Nov 2001, Corvin Zahn wrote:
> Hi,
>
> another question: our customer wants to read out the status of the video
> signal, means they want to know whether there is a video signal at the
> inputs. In the docs I didn't find anything like a status query.
>
> One solution would be to impl
