On Fri, 16 Nov 2001, Corvin Zahn wrote: > On Thu, 15 Nov 2001, Mark Vojkovich wrote: > > > "XV_VIDEO_STATUS" is sort of ambiguous. A name that more obviously > > implies its function seems more appropriate. Maybe > > "XV_PORT_SIGNAL_DETECTED" or "XV_PORT_DATA_EXISTS" but that's a bit long. > > You are right. "XV_SIGNAL_PRESENT"?
Sounds OK to me.
Mark.
_______________________________________________
Xpert mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xpert
