On Wed, 2012-03-07 at 19:34 +, Jonathan Buzzard wrote:
[SNIP]
>
> I will try it again tomorrow when I am back in work as I also have at my
> disposal a dual Xeon at 3.00GHz and a dual Opteron 244 at 1.8GHz and see
> how they fair on video playback. Both of these boxes have 16GB of RAM
>
Hi,
> I will try it again tomorrow when I am back in work as I also have at
> my
> disposal a dual Xeon at 3.00GHz and a dual Opteron 244 at 1.8GHz and
> see
> how they fair on video playback. Both of these boxes have 16GB of RAM
Thanks. Attached to this email is a test sheet that I am using in o
Hi,
> I will try it again tomorrow when I am back in work as I also have at
> my
> disposal a dual Xeon at 3.00GHz and a dual Opteron 244 at 1.8GHz and
> see
> how they fair on video playback. Both of these boxes have 16GB of RAM
Thanks. Attached to this email is a test sheet that I am using in o
t; From: "Jonathan Buzzard"
> To: "Gustavo Homem"
> Cc: xrdp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Sent: Thursday, March 8, 2012 11:05:12 AM
> Subject: Re: [Xrdp-devel] the route to smooth video using XRDP
>
>
> On Wed, 2012-03-07 at 19:34 +, Jonathan Buzzard wrote
Gustavo Homem wrote:
>>> You aren't getting smooth video at 1920x1200 full screen are you? If
>>> you are something is very wrong with our trials.
>> Just, but I have for a terminal server a box with a Xeon X5260 running
>> at 3.33GHz, 16GB of RAM and dual GbE links and almost entirely used by
>>
> >
> > You aren't getting smooth video at 1920x1200 full screen are you? If
> > you are something is very wrong with our trials.
>
> Just, but I have for a terminal server a box with a Xeon X5260 running
> at 3.33GHz, 16GB of RAM and dual GbE links and almost entirely used by
> myself :-)
I hav
Jay Sorg wrote:
>> I can access comparable server hardware and I still see barely acceptable
>> youtube (and horrible vimeo).
>>
>> It would seem that network performance and CPU on the client is the
>> differentiator.
>>
>> I would like to pursue this discussion and invite others to share their
> >
> > I can access comparable server hardware and I still see barely
> > acceptable youtube (and horrible vimeo).
> >
> > It would seem that network performance and CPU on the client is the
> > differentiator.
> >
> > I would like to pursue this discussion and invite others to share
> > their ex
Hello Jay,
A Quarta, 7 de Março de 2012 17:09:16 Jay Sorg você escreveu:
> > I can access comparable server hardware and I still see barely acceptable
> > youtube (and horrible vimeo).
> >
> > It would seem that network performance and CPU on the client is the
> > differentiator.
> >
> > I would l
> I can access comparable server hardware and I still see barely acceptable
> youtube (and horrible vimeo).
>
> It would seem that network performance and CPU on the client is the
> differentiator.
>
> I would like to pursue this discussion and invite others to share their
> experience.
>
> Plus
On Tue, 2012-03-06 at 11:48 +, Gustavo Homem wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> XRDP has been working extremely well for us, except for video playback
> where it still consumes a lot of bandwidth.
>
> What would be the route to have smooth video?
Use a 1Gbps ethernet connection, works for me :-)
>
>
On Wed, 2012-03-07 at 11:18 +, Gustavo Homem wrote:
> > >
> > > Can you share which terminal model you are using?
> >
> > A stripped down PC, has a Core2 6400 at 2.13GHz with 2GB of RAM and
> > an
> > Intel NIC. Runs CentOS6 and is used purely to get RDP sessions on
> > other
> > boxes and d
On Wed, 2012-03-07 at 10:52 +, Gustavo Homem wrote:
> Hi Jonathan,
>
> > On Tue, 2012-03-06 at 11:48 +, Gustavo Homem wrote:
> > > Dear all,
> > >
> > > XRDP has been working extremely well for us, except for video
> > > playback
> > > where it still consumes a lot of bandwidth.
> > >
> > You aren't getting smooth video at 1920x1200 full screen are you?
> > If
> > you are something is very wrong with our trials.
>
> Just, but I have for a terminal server a box with a Xeon X5260
> running
> at 3.33GHz, 16GB of RAM and dual GbE links and almost entirely used
> by
> myself :-)
>
> >
> > Can you share which terminal model you are using?
>
> A stripped down PC, has a Core2 6400 at 2.13GHz with 2GB of RAM and
> an
> Intel NIC. Runs CentOS6 and is used purely to get RDP sessions on
> other
> boxes and display a zenoss dashboard.
>
> All the thin clients suck as they mostly
Hi Jonathan,
> On Tue, 2012-03-06 at 11:48 +, Gustavo Homem wrote:
> > Dear all,
> >
> > XRDP has been working extremely well for us, except for video
> > playback
> > where it still consumes a lot of bandwidth.
> >
> > What would be the route to have smooth video?
>
> Use a 1Gbps ethernet
>
> Seems that the freedrp client already supports that:
>
> http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ff817595%28WS.10%29.aspx
I meant:
https://github.com/FreeRDP/FreeRDP/wiki/Multimedia-Redirection
>
> Cheers
> GH
>
--
Angulo Sólido - Tecnologias de Informação
http://angulosolido.pt
-
17 matches
Mail list logo
