On 11/02/15 17:30, Daniel Mehrmann wrote:
Am 11.02.2015 um 15:22 schrieb Pasi Lallinaho:
While the media size is one of the concerns, it's not the only one.
Download times are an argument for keeping as small as possible; the
smaller our ISOs are, the less time they take to download. Of
Am 11.02.2015 um 15:22 schrieb Pasi Lallinaho:
While the media size is one of the concerns, it's not the only one.
Download times are an argument for keeping as small as possible; the
smaller our ISOs are, the less time they take to download. Of course,
if something is considered essential,
Daniel Mehrmann,
I think we shouldn't forget about latin america too, there is a big
population there and most people doesn't have good internet connection,
unfortunately!
2015-02-11 15:30 GMT-02:00 Daniel Mehrmann daniel.mehrm...@gmx.de:
Am 11.02.2015 um 15:22 schrieb Pasi Lallinaho:
While
Bandwidth caps are definitely a concern here as well, we wouldn't want
somebody to reach their limit because they download Xubuntu. Considering
I've known software developers whose only personal internet connection
was an LTE hotspot, this is definitely possible.
Also, in the US, while there
My main concern is: If we raise the max limit to 2GB, won't we be giving
more opportunities to people say: Well, now that we have 2GB, why don't we
raise it to 3GB? I think we should raise it in 500mb, and set the top
limit as 1.5gb. I don't know if 500mb would be enough, but we should give
it a
In Brazil it depends on the region, on the South is around 8Mb, on the
North the Internet is very expensive, specially in my town, and my
bandwidth is around 2Mb.
I believe that we should give the freedom to developers to include
another programs such as LO, and also provide an alternative
If it's of any use, in Argentina it's around 5Mb, sometimes around
10-20, depending on your provider.
--
xubuntu-devel mailing list
xubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/xubuntu-devel
On 11/02/15 14:40, A Blesius wrote:
I don't see why we should unnecessarily increase the ISO size. LO is
in the repos, so why bother shipping it directly? If we decide to move
on to 2 GB now, then we'll decide for 4 GB some time later. It will
begin to grow from release to release, and at some
On 11 February 2015 at 14:22, Pasi Lallinaho p...@shimmerproject.org
wrote:
While the media size is one of the concerns, it's not the only one.
Download times are an argument for keeping as small as possible; the
smaller our ISOs are, the less time they take to download. Of course, if
/20150211/14cef91f/attachment-0001.html
--
Message: 3
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 16:22:52 +0200
From: Pasi Lallinaho p...@shimmerproject.org
To: Xubuntu Development Discussion xubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Subject: Re: [TEAM] ISO target size
Message-ID: 54db65bc.7050
/mailman/listinfo/xubuntu-devel
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/xubuntu-devel/attachments/20150211/14cef91f/attachment-0001.html
--
Message: 3
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 16:22:52 +0200
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I don't see why we should unnecessarily increase the ISO size. LO is
in the repos, so why bother shipping it directly? If we decide to move
on to 2 GB now, then we'll decide for 4 GB some time later. It will
begin to grow from release to release, and
On 11/02/15 16:35, Micah Gersten wrote:
On February 11, 2015 7:52:56 AM CST, Pasi Lallinaho p...@shimmerproject.org
wrote:
Hello,
in the last community meeting we had some discussion about the target
size for our ISO. Since many of the team weren't attending, we wanted
to
bring the
Hello,
in the last community meeting we had some discussion about the target
size for our ISO. Since many of the team weren't attending, we wanted to
bring the discussion in the mailing list.
PLEASE NOTE that this is not a idea/proposal thread for ideas on filling
the ISO with $software. People
In my opinion it's only desirable to stay somewhat below 2 GB (with a
margin of 100 - 200 MB). So that all 2 GB USB thumb drives are fit for
Xubuntu, with a few MB's to spare for persistent space for documents and
such.
As far as I'm concerned, there's no need to strive for below or as close
as
2015-02-11 12:06 GMT-03:00 Pasi Lallinaho p...@shimmerproject.org:
I would suggest a one click install or something similar for LibreOffice
amd stick with 1GB.
This has been suggested before with LibreOffice and other software. What
does the rest of the team feel about this generally
On 11/02/15 16:55, abdullah demir wrote:
Enigmail: *Parts of the message have NOT been signed or encrypted*
be able to work on any platform CD-ROM should work even 650 mb.küçük light
most beautiful xubuntu2015-02-11 16:53 GMT+02:00 abdullah demir
abdullahdemir.o...@gmail.com:I think it
While the media size is one of the concerns, it's not the only one.
Download times are an argument for keeping as small as possible; the
smaller our ISOs are, the less time they take to download. Of course, if
something is considered essential, then it can be added, but the
starting point should
Hello,
for the parties interested in helping with the documentation, namely the
installer slideshow, we will be having a sprint to work on the 15.04
installer slideshow content and presentation on
Saturday, Feb 14 at 15UTC on #xubuntu-devel
As always, the event is open for everybody. Ideas
19 matches
Mail list logo
