On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 4:04 PM, Jim Campbell jwcampb...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
Thanks for your input, and for bringing some of these issues to our
attention. I'd like to try and summarize some of the issues and concerns
that people have.
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 5:31 AM, Marko Oreskovic
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 03:27:40PM +0100, Vincent wrote:
You forgot the UI consistency issue, which I personally consider pretty
important.
Anyway, for as far as we can't already say this has been concluded, here's
another vote for not including it in the LTS. I also saw Lionel uploaded
Hi All,
Thanks for your input, and for bringing some of these issues to our
attention. I'd like to try and summarize some of the issues and concerns
that people have.
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 5:31 AM, Marko Oreskovic markore...@gmail.comwrote:
Vincent wrote:
Also, Chrome extensions aren't
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 09:04:23 -0600
Jim Campbell jwcampb...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
Thanks for your input, and for bringing some of these issues to our
attention. I'd like to try and summarize some of the issues and concerns
that people have.
What do people think? Given all of this,
Charlie Kravetz wrote:
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 09:04:23 -0600
Jim Campbell jwcampb...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
Thanks for your input, and for bringing some of these issues to our
attention. I'd like to try and summarize some of the issues and concerns
that people have.
What do people
Jim,
I'll mainly comment on 3)
Statistics from the Firefox add-ons site (ordered by popularity) ..
#1 *Adblock Plus: 926,549 weekly downloads*
#2 Coral IE Tab: 105,047 weekly downloads
#3 Download Flash and Video: 60,397 weekly downloads
ie. Adblock Plus is very
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 5:11 PM, David Collins david.8.coll...@gmail.comwrote:
Jim,
I'll mainly comment on 3)
Statistics from the Firefox add-ons site (ordered by popularity) ..
#1 *Adblock Plus: 926,549 weekly downloads*
#2 Coral IE Tab: 105,047 weekly downloads
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 20:17:01 +0200
Pasi Lallinaho o...@knome.fi wrote:
Charlie Kravetz wrote:
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 09:04:23 -0600
Jim Campbell jwcampb...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
Thanks for your input, and for bringing some of these issues to our
attention. I'd like to try and
Vincent wrote:
Also, Chrome extensions aren't yet as powerful, as the Adblock
lookalikes for Chrome can't actually block ads from being loaded, just
prevent them from being displayed. This exposes you to a lot more
scrutiny from advertising companies.
Also +1 against Chrome as default
Marcos wrote:
Hi!
I vote for Chromium, not Chrome.
But Chromium and Chrome has a important problem: I can't localize to
my language.
Only the languages that they choose, can enter in Chromium/Chrome.
You can read more here: http://acurti.es/8la
Marked as Won't fix :( I think is contrary
I think it would be wise to see how the mobile team will address the video
playback issue [0] in Chromium before considering a move.
[0] http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_itempx=NzkxNQ
--
xubuntu-devel mailing list
xubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
I use Firefox but have been watching Chrome carefully with an eye to
switching, but it seems that Google still has a bit of work to do before it
matches Firefox's extensions.
This is an interesting article because it gets into the details of Chrome
extensions enough to pick out some of the
Hi!
You have more information here about my petitions for localizate to my
language (asturian language):
http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=28348
and here:
https://answers.launchpad.net/chromium-browser/+question/90682
And do not seem very interested in the location of application
On Wed, 2010-01-13 at 10:57 -0600, Jim Campbell wrote:
Hi All,
I wanted to suggest to the team that we switch from using Firefox to
Google Chrome as the default web browser for the Lucid release.
At UDS the Ubuntu Mobile team lead announced that they would be
switching to Google Chrome as
Dave Morley wrote:
On Wed, 2010-01-13 at 10:57 -0600, Jim Campbell wrote:
Hi All,
I wanted to suggest to the team that we switch from using Firefox to
Google Chrome as the default web browser for the Lucid release.
At UDS the Ubuntu Mobile team lead announced that they would be
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 11:02 AM, Pasi Lallinaho o...@knome.fi wrote:
Dave Morley wrote:
Jim out of curiosity what does epiphany use in comparison?
Or midori.
We would have to look at those, but given the lack of extensions and
keyboard shortcuts for Epiphany, and the newness of
Jim Campbell wrote:
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 11:02 AM, Pasi Lallinaho o...@knome.fi
mailto:o...@knome.fi wrote:
Dave Morley wrote:
Jim out of curiosity what does epiphany use in comparison?
Or midori.
We would have to look at those, but given the lack of extensions
On Wed, 2010-01-13 at 19:12 +0200, Pasi Lallinaho wrote:
Jim Campbell wrote:
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 11:02 AM, Pasi Lallinaho o...@knome.fi
wrote:
Dave Morley wrote:
Jim out of curiosity what does epiphany use in comparison?
HI Jim
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 6:57 PM, Jim Campbell jwcampb...@gmail.com wrote:
I know that Charlie had said that switching browsers for an LTS wouldn't be
a great idea, but given the points I've mentioned above, it seems one worth
considering. What do you think?
I also use Chrome/ium and
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 12:57 AM, Jim Campbell jwcampb...@gmail.com wrote:
I wanted to suggest to the team that we switch from using Firefox to Google
Chrome as the default web browser for the Lucid release.
At UDS the Ubuntu Mobile team lead announced that they would be switching to
Google
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 11:38 AM, Jonathan Carter (highvoltage)
jonat...@ubuntu.com wrote:
HI Jim
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 6:57 PM, Jim Campbell jwcampb...@gmail.com
wrote:
I know that Charlie had said that switching browsers for an LTS wouldn't
be
a great idea, but given the points I've
Hi,
Just to clarify... are we talking about google chrome, or chromium? As i
understand they are 2 different things.
Since LL will be a LTS release, maybe we shouldn't include beta software.
Best,
Kaspar
2010/1/13 Jim Campbell jwcampb...@gmail.com
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 11:38 AM,
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 12:36 PM, Kaspar Kööp meb...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Just to clarify... are we talking about google chrome, or chromium? As i
understand they are 2 different things.
Since LL will be a LTS release, maybe we shouldn't include beta software.
Best,
Kaspar
It looks
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 7:43 PM, Jim Campbell jwcampb...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 12:36 PM, Kaspar Kööp meb...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Just to clarify... are we talking about google chrome, or chromium? As i
understand they are 2 different things.
Since LL will be a LTS
24 matches
Mail list logo
