Ximin Luo dixit:
>needs to more clearly distinguish between the build and the host
>environment - like how compilers do. So for example, here the "most
>correct" solution would be to add a HOST_POSIX_SHELL and default this
No, this is outside of the scope of autotools and a common misuse
of them
Ximin Luo dixit:
>(Did you mean to add debian-bugs-dist and Jonathan Nieder on purpose
>or by accident? I removed them, but feel free to add them back in.)
I didn’t, maybe debbugs did.
>In other words: in your scenario, one would not use $POSIX_SHELL but
>some other specific test for those
Ximin Luo dixit:
>I'm not sure if you understood what was being discussed.
I understand it extremely well.
>proposed patch affect your scenario? This is not about CONFIG_SHELL,
It is. Straight from your diff:
> for gl_cv_posix_shell in \
>-"$CONFIG_SHELL" "$SHELL" /bin/sh
Mike Melanson dixit:
gcc -std=gnu89 -I../linux/include/linux -I. -DXZ_DEC_X86 -DXZ_DEC_POWERPC
^^
You probably want -std=gnu99 here.
-DXZ_DEC_IA64 -DXZ_DEC_ARM -DXZ_DEC_ARMTHUMB -DXZ_DEC_SPARC
-DXZ_DEC_ANY_CHECK -ggdb3 -O2 -pedantic -Wall -Wextra -c -o boottest.o
boottest.c
In file
