Re: [Yade-dev] Odp: Re: Yade for LTS Ubuntu 18.04

Awesome! Thank you! :-) On 22 Feb 2018, 21:12 +0100, Anton Gladky , wrote: > Dear Yade developers, > > the new minor Yade 2018.02b was released on 20-th of February. > It allows us to compile Yade against CGAL_4.11 and fixes some > bugs. Tarballs are available on GitHub

Re: [Yade-dev] Odp: Re: Yade for LTS Ubuntu 18.04

Dear Yade developers, the new minor Yade 2018.02b was released on 20-th of February. It allows us to compile Yade against CGAL_4.11 and fixes some bugs. Tarballs are available on GitHub [1] and Launchpad [2]. Also the new version was uploaded to Debian [3] and even synced into the Ubuntu LTS

Re: [Yade-dev] Odp: Re: Yade for LTS Ubuntu 18.04

On 02/16/2018 11:12 PM, Anton Gladky wrote: thanks all for the effective and fast contribution resolving CGAL issue! Thank you for efficient scramble! :) Bruno ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev Post to :

Re: [Yade-dev] Odp: Re: Yade for LTS Ubuntu 18.04

Hi Anton, I confirm that your latest commit fixes the polyhedra crush problem :) Do you know what caused the freeze? best regards Janek Dnia 16 lutego 2018 23:12 Anton Gladky gladky.an...@gmail.com napisał(a): Dear all, thanks all for the

Re: [Yade-dev] Odp: Re: Yade for LTS Ubuntu 18.04

Dear all, thanks all for the effective and fast contribution resolving CGAL issue! I will try to fix polyhedron-crash test as soon as possible and release the new minor Yade version. Best regards Anton On Feb 16, 2018 17:27, "Luc Scholtes" wrote: Hi guys, Just a

Re: [Yade-dev] Odp: Re: Yade for LTS Ubuntu 18.04

Hi Robert, Congrats for finding the bug and thanks for fixing. On 02/13/2018 11:55 PM, Robert Caulk wrote: the issue was compiler related. GCC 5.4 on ubuntu 16.04 initialized factorizeOnly to false by default, while GCC 7.2 on ubuntu 18.04 did not do this. That's a good example of

Re: [Yade-dev] Odp: Re: Yade for LTS Ubuntu 18.04

Ok, I pushed the fix for the DEM-PFV-check.py failure. I discovered the issue was compiler related. GCC 5.4 on ubuntu 16.04 initialized factorizeOnly to false by default, while GCC 7.2 on ubuntu 18.04 did not do this. Therefore, the only necessary change ended up being the explicit initialization

Re: [Yade-dev] Odp: Re: Yade for LTS Ubuntu 18.04

On 02/13/2018 10:12 AM, Robert Caulk wrote: I’m running into deeper problems than I expected on this solver bug fix. I need some more time to trouble shoot. Let me know, I can also try some things. I have been able at least to compile and run cholmod on 18.04 with simple c++ programs. I

Re: [Yade-dev] Odp: Re: Yade for LTS Ubuntu 18.04

I’m running into deeper problems than I expected on this solver bug fix. I need some more time to trouble shoot. What’s our deadline? I read something about a freeze till March 1st? Regarding standard gpus for yade: No, suitesparse depends on double precision compute power and standard graphics

Re: [Yade-dev] Odp: Re: Yade for LTS Ubuntu 18.04

Awesome. Years ago we were using cholmod without the eigen interface, it will be a revert... These cholmod/openblas issues make me nervous (not mentionning other attempts with Pardiso and Taucs, which all worked at some point). It still did not stabilize after 6+ years. Do you think the GPU

Re: [Yade-dev] Odp: Re: Yade for LTS Ubuntu 18.04

Yes! We should be able to replace the Eigen cholmod interface entirely with the existing direct cholmod solver (useSolver=4). Right now the #ifdefs are configured for the special GPU build but I will generalize it today and commit it so that it can be used without GPU compilation flags. Cholmod is

Re: [Yade-dev] Odp: Re: Yade for LTS Ubuntu 18.04

Thank you very much for help Janek. I confirm that I could compile trunk on ubuntu18 with CGAL, without special steps (not even dpkg, just cmake+make without options). For DEM-PFV-check.py the problem is with the cholmod solver. I'll try and fix that. @Robert, you mentioned that by-passing

[Yade-dev] Odp: Re: Yade for LTS Ubuntu 18.04

OK, so I did the initial commit for cgal 4.11, the most importatnt stuff is in the commit message. I will repeat it here in short: 1.  maybe the #ifdefs that I added in lib/triangulation/RegularTrian are not necessary? 2. the  ALPHASHAPES changes inlib/triangulation/Tesselatio are not