Question #707197 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/707197
Status: Open => Answered
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
Hi,
The issue doesn't seem to be closed. So, no, you don't have to close it.
I don't have time to inspect any new script now, tho
Question #707183 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/707183
Status: Open => Answered
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
Hi,
> "I don't know why the high unbalanced force ratio happened and exists
without any trend toward reduction."
T
Question #707148 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/707148
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
Hi,
> "My problem is that I just finished the part about generating flexible
membranes using Pfacet and don't know what to do next."
I did not read al
Question #707019 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/707019
Status: Open => Answered
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
Hi, in general using "pip install" is the best way to break a debian
distribution. What you get is not systematic but
Question #706740 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/706740
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
I doubt vtkRecorder was the problem given this line (related to solving a
linear system):
CHOLMOD error: invalid xtype. file: ../Cholesky/cholmod_analyze.c line
Question #706740 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/706740
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
Thanks. We have the same versions... hard to tell why it doesn't give the same
behavior on two computers and very difficult to debug.
Do you get the same error
Question #706740 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/706740
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
Try yadedaily?
--
You received this question notification because your team yade-users is
an answer contact for Yade
Question #706740 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/706740
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
2018...
Apparently something has been improved since then.
I suggest using a newer version.
--
You received this question notification because your team yade-users
Question #706740 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/706740
Bruno Chareyre requested more information:
I cannot reproduce your problem with current yadedaily
(20230525-7264~94b01fd~focal1).
Which version are you using?
--
You received this question notification
Question #706740 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/706740
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
Initially, I thought your script was crashing in undrained conditions. I thus
conjectured that it could come from uninitialized pressure.
But in fact the script
Question #706740 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/706740
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
> I imposed pressure (flow.imposePressure)
No, you don't. In the script this line is commented out. If you were
imposing pressure it would be a "drain
Question #706740 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/706740
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
Hi,
I checked the script and I did not see a problem.
There is a pressure response by the fluid when loading is applied.
Did you expect something different? How
Question #706740 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/706740
Chareyre proposed the following answer:
No, not yet. In the coming days with a bit of luck.
Message d'origine De : Fedor
Date : 30/05/2023 16:55 (GMT+01:00) À
: bruno.chare...@grenoble
Question #706740 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/706740
Status: Open => Answered
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
Hi Fedor,
Mathematically it should be possible to solve for pressure when the fluid is
compressible (else it is ill-po
Question #706573 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/706573
Status: Open => Answered
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
Hello,
Most likely this equation is erroneous:
new_volume_cylinder = math.pi * (0.051)**2 * top
In fact I don't see &qu
Question #706571 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/706571
Status: Open => Needs information
Bruno Chareyre requested more information:
Hi, could you detail the differences between a working version (before "When I
add mR to my script") and a non wo
Question #706569 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/706569
Status: Open => Answered
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
Hi,
You can use "goal" and "stressMask" [1] to impose stress in some direction.
If you can do that then y
Question #706553 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/706553
Bruno Chareyre posted a new comment:
Hi,
I think strain damping could give a null volumetric rate in this case. It's
consistent with the fact that even with 0.99 ev is still (somehow) small.
The algorithm
Question #706218 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/706218
Bruno Chareyre posted a new comment:
Hi,
I confirm that clumps are not supported in this case. In fact, it should work
if the clumped spheres are not overlapping too much, but in the general case it
won't.
Jan
Question #706072 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/706072
Status: Open => Needs information
Bruno Chareyre requested more information:
Could you show a script where walls do not follow the prescribed
velocity gradient?
--
You received this question notificat
Question #706100 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/706100
Status: Open => Answered
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
Hi,
> Is this normal DEM behavior?
I don't know what "normal DEM behavior" is, so I would say "
Question #706072 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/706072
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
Hi,
In fact, allowBiggerThanPeriod=True is perfectly fine, and it is designed
exactly for this case where large plates are used as boundary conditions.
You need
Question #705955 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/705955
Status: Open => Answered
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
Hi,
> Has the contact law been tested before?
I am not quite sure.
Maybe Chiara Modenese used mainly one of the different ve
Question #705913 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/705913
Status: Open => Answered
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
Hi,
Your problems seem very platform dependent.
I have been working in a couple different contexts and I have never seen a n
Question #705760 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/705760
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
Python's time.time() is enough in many cases, as long as you don't need
per-engine data or nano-second accuracy.
t1 = time.time()
O.run(...)
realTime = time.time
Question #705740 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/705740
Status: Open => Answered
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
I was not questioning why you use multiple scripts to produce results, this is
your business (although none of the reasons you l
Question #705150 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/705150
Status: Open => Answered
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
Hi,
"yadeimport" used to be a symlink to the yade executable, created locally by
the user.
If you run, let's say, t
Question #705740 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/705740
Status: Needs information => Answered
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
Something rings a bell:
O.bodies[-1].state.blockedDOFs='xyXYZ'
Does body "-1" have a mass, at least?...
I'
Question #705740 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/705740
Status: Open => Needs information
Bruno Chareyre requested more information:
Hello,
Could you please try an concatenate the files as much as possible (ideally just
one file)? or find a way to reprod
Question #704306 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/704306
Bruno Chareyre posted a new comment:
Dear Ahmad, it is very difficult to answer without seeing an actual code.
You should push code/scripts to some branch.
One thing I can explain is that ThermalEngine
Question #704434 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/704434
Status: Open => Answered
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
For the uniaxial periodicity, I think yes, what you do is correct.
The hollowness is really not a problem. If you know the mass
Question #704434 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/704434
Status: Open => Needs information
Bruno Chareyre requested more information:
Hello, I don't understand the problem very well.
What is x,y,z? Is there gravity (which axis?)?
Why do you care about the pl
Question #704389 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/704389
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
Hello Roxana,
I have no real knowledge of how LiqControl works but maybe it's taking most of
the time, and if it is not parallelized it would explain.
I see you
Question #704035 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/704035
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
Hi,
I reported the bug [1]. It sounds like an initialization problem that could be
solved by inspecting how the YADE_CLASS_... macro is used.
[1] https
Question #703901 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/703901
Bruno Chareyre posted a new comment:
Hi,
> I am confused coz I tried these two ways and they are different in my
> simulation
They are derived with slightly different logics and so they have no
Question #703707 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/703707
Status: Open => Answered
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
Hi,
> I assume 2PFV does not appropriate for this aim.
Correct. For one-phase flow based on the PFV method the engine is
Flow
Question #703681 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/703681
Status: Open => Answered
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
Hi,
> 'VTKRecorder', 'TwoPhaseFlowEngine' is not defined.
Apparently, you disabled them at compile time.
Please post the
Question #703498 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/703498
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
Hi,
Without knowing anything of your problem. My first guess is that even a
symmetric distribution of positions will result in non-symmetric results,
provided
Question #703504 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/703504
Bruno Chareyre posted a new comment:
Hi,
In your situation, I would first check if the host HPC has Singularity (maybe)
or Docker (unlikely) available.
If so, you don't need to compile. Just run a virtual
Question #703489 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/703489
Status: Open => Answered
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
Hi,
You can indeed use the wall_XXX_id's to retrieve the boxes and take their
positions.
If thickness is 0 their positi
Question #703284 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/703284
Status: Open => Answered
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
Q1. " could the setting of pressure be applied by flow.imposePressure()?"
Yes, it could.
Q2. Yes.
Q3. Tak
Question #703284 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/703284
Status: Open => Answered
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
Hi,
Q1." flow.gradP？or flow.imposePressure() ?" both work and they are
compatible with each other. Typically, you
Question #703276 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/703276
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
Thanks for finding that.
I fixed PeriTriaxController in another merge request. [1]
B
[1] https://gitlab.com/yade-dev/trunk/-/merge_requests/892
--
You received
Question #703169 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/703169
Status: Open => Answered
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
It will be fixed with https://gitlab.com/yade-dev/trunk/-/merge_requests/891.
I confirmed the fix with a modified version of
Question #703169 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/703169
Bruno Chareyre posted a new comment:
I found the problem, getStress does not handle clumps...
In the product f*branch, "branch" should point to one single point per
body (in this case: per clump
Question #703169 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/703169
Status: Open => Answered
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
Hi, that changing members size results in different stiffness is a correct
observation.
It is not "wrong", in the se
Question #702448 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/702448
Status: Open => Answered
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
updateTriangulation is inherited from one-phase flow engine. If it is triggered
in the 2-phase child class (not tested) the b
Question #702448 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/702448
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
Hi,
The simple answer, not very satisfying I'm afraid, is "mesh doesn't evolve".
The engine builds a static pore network. How to update the network in a
Question #702411 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/702411
Chareyre posted a new comment:
I don't understand last question, sorry.
--
You received this question notification because your team yade-users is
an answer contact for Yade
Question #702418 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/702418
Status: Open => Answered
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
Hi,
1- Is "osmotic pressure" just the fluid pressure? ("osmotic" is strange in this
context).
2- your pr
Question #702412 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/702412
Status: Open => Answered
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
Hi,
If there are only two bodies O.forces.f(0) and O.interactions[0,1] should be
the same.
Except that the first will not g
Question #702411 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/702411
Status: Open => Answered
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
Hi,
Something like this?
timeSeries = []
while totalRotationhttps://launchpad.net/~yade-users
Post to : yade-us
Question #702407 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/702407
Status: Open => Answered
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
Hi,
This error suggests huge overlaps between some spheres, such that in some pore
throats the intersected solid area is more t
ctures/181144
Thanks for sharing this announcement with potential candidates!
Best regards
S. LAMBERT and B. CHAREYRE
[1] https://cloud.univ-grenoble-alpes.fr/s/yGrdzxQPWxwcagN
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yade-users
Post to : yade
Question #702047 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/702047
Status: Open => Answered
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
Hi,
Please show example scripts.
Bruno
--
You received this question notification because your team yade-users is
an answer cont
Question #701938 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/701938
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
Indeed, enlarged bboxes and cell distorsions may make 4 not enough, but you get
the idea.
B
--
You received this question notification because your team yade
Question #701938 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/701938
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
Welcome.
If you define at least 3 (or maybe 4) you could turn off
"allowBiggerThanPeriod".
But as long it detects contacts properly it should be t
Question #658938 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/658938
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
Hi, please open a new question if you have one.
Bruno
--
You received this question notification because your team yade-users is
an answer contact for Yade
Question #701938 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/701938
Status: Open => Answered
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
Hi,
I've seen working examples where the cylinder was discretized into multiple
connexions, all smaller than period. It co
Question #701743 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/701743
Bruno Chareyre posted a new comment:
Hi,
Please explain what is wrong in you opinion and how it can be reproduced. The
script you pasted will not work for anyone else because of this line:
spheres
Hi,
Please find the announcement below and feel free to forward.
Regards
Bruno
--
Dear Yade users,
please find below an open position about Discrete Element modeling. The
targeted Discrete Element code is officially "GranOO" but it is open to
other opensource codes (as Yade).
Question #701782 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/701782
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
At the moment it is a bit convolved to read your changes but it seems I was
able to break your algorithm.
A suspicious feature of yours is that it tries to align
Question #701845 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/701845
Status: Open => Answered
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
Hi,
The documentation should tell you if it is implemented for a particular functor.
If it isn't, an easy way to offset is explai
Question #701782 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/701782
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
See more here:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/030193229290074Q
--
You received this question notification because your team yade-users
Question #701836 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/701836
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
Hi,
"size, hSize, hSize0, and refSize"
The simple answer is: "hSize" gives the current shape.
You can ignore the others.
Their documentation i
Question #701782 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/701782
Bruno Chareyre posted a new comment:
Hi,
I'll check the suggested MR whenever I have a chance.
The case of stretching can be overcomed in a few special cases. It needs
to define an initial cell size
Question #701782 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/701782
Status: Open => Answered
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
In principle all cells can be flipped, yes. What you get suggests that the
automatic determination of the flip matrix fails.
Not s
Question #701764 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/701764
Status: Open => Answered
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
Hi,
[1] is outdated, or maybe just misleading (it says "it needs to be done", not
"it's not done").
And, yes,
Question #701670 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/701670
Status: Open => Answered
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
In the above code fragment (#11) you block DOFs but you don't solve any
fluid flow after that, so it's completely ineffective.
In
Question #701670 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/701670
Status: Open => Answered
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
If I understand well, you are compressing a packing with an imposed velocity
of 0.3.
As a result, the fluid goes out thro
Question #701670 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/701670
Status: Open => Answered
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
> in the oedometer section there is also triaxial load and unload for
> compaction.
> But I need just vertical load fo
Question #701670 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/701670
Status: Open => Answered
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
I don't know what you "should" use. It all depends on what you want to
simulate. Which direction for the pressure gr
Question #701670 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/701670
Status: Open => Answered
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
Hi,
The example script oedometer.py is doing exactly what you are asking and
apparently you re-used it.
But at the same time you s
Question #701666 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/701666
Status: Open => Answered
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
Hi,
There is indeed an export function for paraview:
https://yade-dem.org/doc/yade.wrapper.html?highlight=flow%20eng
Question #701641 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/701641
Bruno Chareyre posted a new comment:
Hi there,
Just a quick comment: non-newtonian fluid flow at the pore scale sounds very
interesting but right now I have no idea how to achieve that. It would need, I
Question #701581 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/701581
Status: Open => Answered
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
Hi,
Unless you found a bug, yes, the two cases should be equivalent.
It's hard to know if you made a mistake in converting materi
Question #701438 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/701438
Status: Open => Answered
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
Hi,
I guess you want to simulate elastic waves or something, but as I was reading
phase 2 I did not see anything special exer
Question #700953 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/700953
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
This example is an oedometer with fluid coupling:
https://gitlab.com/yade-
dev/trunk/-/blob/master/examples/FluidCouplingPFV/oedometer.py
--
You received
Question #700953 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/700953
Status: Needs information => Answered
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
For PSD there is a good example here:
https://gitlab.com/yade-dev/trunk/-/blob/master/examples/test/psd.py
Bruno
--
Question #700931 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/700931
Status: Needs information => Answered
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
Hi,
That's how bodies are colored based on their subdomain in the mpi
module, it should apply for anything e
Question #700924 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/700924
Status: Open => Answered
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
Hi,
TriaxialStressController can be used for 2D cases but it still requires that
you place 6 walls (in fact boxes), not 4.
A
Question #700861 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/700861
Status: Open => Answered
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
That company will have to find out the problem or report it.
I don't know that we can fix problems when we are completely bl
Question #700889 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/700889
Status: Open => Answered
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
Hi,
How do you distinguish a collision from a contact?
Bruno
--
You received this question notification because your team yade-us
Question #700847 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/700847
Status: Open => Answered
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
As pointed out by Jan, there is no contact damping in Yade's CundallStrack.
If Newton.damping =0 (which I recommend in quastista
Question #700830 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/700830
Status: Open => Answered
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
FlowEngine has more features to visit the graph.
Something like this should work (not tested but the needed functi
Question #700861 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/700861
Bruno Chareyre requested more information:
Hi,
What's that "cloud computing platform", which OS?
How do you install?
Bruno
--
You received this question notification because your team yade-users is
Question #700761 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/700761
Status: Open => Needs information
Bruno Chareyre requested more information:
> I tried changing flow.permeabilityFactor to a positive value and other
values.However,It seems that the data I record is
Question #700830 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/700830
Status: Needs information => Answered
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
Hi,
The image [1] was generated semi-automatically with POV-ray, using data
generated collected from FlowEng
Question #700611 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/700611
Status: Open => Needs information
Bruno Chareyre requested more information:
Oh... but I thought the question was about "large number of particles".
Now it's about "packs".
what d
Question #700761 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/700761
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
> the unit of the value measured by flow.getBoundaryFlux
It is in velocity * area.
B
--
You received this question notification because your team yade-us
Question #700611 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/700611
Bruno Chareyre requested more information:
> Yes
Your question states the opposite it seems...
Can you be more specific on which number of particles gives the problem and
provide a script showing the prob
Question #678523 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/678523
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
Please don't re-use a 3-year old thread for asking a question.
B
--
You received this question notification because your team yade-users is
an answer contact
Question #700748 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/700748
Status: Open => Answered
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
Hi,
No, I don't see a simple way to track this "per contact".
Energy tracking would give a total for all contacts, not
Question #700743 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/700743
Status: Open => Answered
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
Hi,
I ran your script and I didn't see a problem on yade side
(20211216-6185~d81270c~focal1 here).
The timestep is stable.
It r
Question #700611 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/700611
Bruno Chareyre requested more information:
Indeed. It's a glibc error [1] even if it sounds mechanical ("consolidation").
So you have crashes without MPI and without aggregates when using many
partic
Question #700617 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/700617
Bruno Chareyre posted a new comment:
> b.shape.extents = b.shape.extents * 10
Perfect answer.
Remember that it only works if thickness is null.
B
--
You received this question notification because your t
Question #700611 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/700611
Status: Open => Answered
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
> still it works for lower number of particles
You mean it doesn't crash, right? Even so, I don't see it giving
consistent r
Question #700617 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/700617
Status: Open => Answered
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
Hi,
This script will not run with python3.
Questions coming to mind, though:
- why not defining larger walls in the first place?
-
Question #700611 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/700611
Status: Open => Answered
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
Hi,
This has 0% chances to work.
MPI uses a domain decomposition with one yade instance running each subdomain.
What happens in y
Question #700587 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/700587
Status: Needs information => Answered
Bruno Chareyre proposed the following answer:
> flow.meshUpdateInterval=2
This is an enormous workload, it means to rebuild a mesh, a permeability
1 - 100 of 2357 matches
Mail list logo
