[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-5892?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15983076#comment-15983076
]
Jason Lowe commented on YARN-5892:
--
I won't block this patch over the MULP*weight <= 100 c
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6524?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15982974#comment-15982974
]
Jason Lowe commented on YARN-6524:
--
This is a duplicate of YARN-65.
> Avoid storing unnec
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6524?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jason Lowe resolved YARN-6524.
--
Resolution: Duplicate
> Avoid storing unnecessary information in the Memory for the finished apps
> -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-5892?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15981164#comment-15981164
]
Jason Lowe commented on YARN-5892:
--
I don't understand imposing a hard limit of weight < 1
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-3839?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15978705#comment-15978705
]
Jason Lowe commented on YARN-3839:
--
Please see my [earlier
comment|https://issues.apache.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6501?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15976822#comment-15976822
]
Jason Lowe commented on YARN-6501:
--
+1 committing this.
> FSSchedulerNode.java fails to c
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-3839?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15975315#comment-15975315
]
Jason Lowe commented on YARN-3839:
--
The QA bot is probably having issues with the patch si
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6272?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15974876#comment-15974876
]
Jason Lowe commented on YARN-6272:
--
I've also seen this stacktrace on 2.8:
{noformat}
java
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2113?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15974679#comment-15974679
]
Jason Lowe commented on YARN-2113:
--
The more I think about this, I believe it is completel
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2113?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15973638#comment-15973638
]
Jason Lowe commented on YARN-2113:
--
Is a deadzone the proper way to fix this? I'm thinkin
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6467?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15973466#comment-15973466
]
Jason Lowe commented on YARN-6467:
--
bq. I thought of segregating partition based queue met
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-5892?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15973168#comment-15973168
]
Jason Lowe commented on YARN-5892:
--
bq. Also, weight of users applies to hard limit of use
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-5892?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15972821#comment-15972821
]
Jason Lowe commented on YARN-5892:
--
I'm +1 for weight == 0. As long as it doesn't break t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6480?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15969614#comment-15969614
]
Jason Lowe commented on YARN-6480:
--
+1 lgtm. Committing this.
> Timeout is too aggressiv
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2985?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15969088#comment-15969088
]
Jason Lowe commented on YARN-2985:
--
Doing a config for branch-2 seems reasonable.
bq. my
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-3839?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jason Lowe reassigned YARN-3839:
Assignee: Manikandan R
> Quit throwing NMNotYetReadyException
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-5617?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jason Lowe updated YARN-5617:
-
Attachment: YARN-5617.003.patch
Updated the patch.
> AMs only intended to run one attempt can be run more
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-3839?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15968022#comment-15968022
]
Jason Lowe commented on YARN-3839:
--
My understanding is the same. It looks like the exist
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2985?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15967748#comment-15967748
]
Jason Lowe commented on YARN-2985:
--
Based on the description of this JIRA, I think there's
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6461?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15964424#comment-15964424
]
Jason Lowe commented on YARN-6461:
--
+1 lgtm. Committing this.
> TestRMAdminCLI has very
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6195?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15964375#comment-15964375
]
Jason Lowe commented on YARN-6195:
--
I do not think a separate HADOOP JIRA is necessary her
Jason Lowe created YARN-6461:
Summary: TestRMAdminCLI has very low test timeouts
Key: YARN-6461
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6461
Project: Hadoop YARN
Issue Type: Bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6456?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15962801#comment-15962801
]
Jason Lowe commented on YARN-6456:
--
bq. DockerLinuxContainerRuntime mounts containerLocalD
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6451?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15961022#comment-15961022
]
Jason Lowe commented on YARN-6451:
--
Interesting idea. For some of these invariants, would
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6195?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15960991#comment-15960991
]
Jason Lowe commented on YARN-6195:
--
Thanks for updating the patch! At first I thought we
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6443?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15960755#comment-15960755
]
Jason Lowe commented on YARN-6443:
--
Ah, so this apparently is describing a problem that on
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6288?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15959782#comment-15959782
]
Jason Lowe commented on YARN-6288:
--
+1 for the branch-2.8 patch as well. The unit test fa
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6288?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jason Lowe updated YARN-6288:
-
Affects Version/s: 2.8.0
2.7.3
Priority: Critical (was: Minor)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6344?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15957849#comment-15957849
]
Jason Lowe commented on YARN-6344:
--
I'd prefer a configured rack locality delay of zero me
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6450?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jason Lowe updated YARN-6450:
-
Attachment: YARN-6450.001.patch
Using {{Assume.assumeTrue(shouldRunTest())}} in the existing setup function
Jason Lowe created YARN-6450:
Summary: TestContainerManagerWithLCE requires override for each
new test added to ContainerManagerTest
Key: YARN-6450
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6450
Pro
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6403?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15957290#comment-15957290
]
Jason Lowe commented on YARN-6403:
--
+1 for the latest trunk and 2.8 patches. Committing t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6436?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jason Lowe updated YARN-6436:
-
Fix Version/s: 2.8.1
I committed this to branch-2.8 as well.
> TestSchedulingPolicy#testParseSchedulingPol
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6443?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15956947#comment-15956947
]
Jason Lowe commented on YARN-6443:
--
Could you elaborate a bit on the use case where an app
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6195?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15956922#comment-15956922
]
Jason Lowe commented on YARN-6195:
--
I'm totally OK with just reporting the default partiti
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6403?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jason Lowe updated YARN-6403:
-
Attachment: YARN-6403.branch-2.8.004.patch
Thanks for updating the patch! Looks good to me. Posting the s
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6436?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=1594#comment-1594
]
Jason Lowe commented on YARN-6436:
--
Do we even need a timeout for this test?
> TestSchedu
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6195?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=1592#comment-1592
]
Jason Lowe commented on YARN-6195:
--
This seems like a reasonable approach to take until th
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6437?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jason Lowe updated YARN-6437:
-
Attachment: YARN-6437.001.patch
Patch that accumulates the received containers across all the allocate call
Jason Lowe created YARN-6437:
Summary: TestSignalContainer#testSignalRequestDeliveryToNM fails
intermittently
Key: YARN-6437
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6437
Project: Hadoop YARN
Jason Lowe created YARN-6436:
Summary: TestSchedulingPolicy#testParseSchedulingPolicy timeout is
too low
Key: YARN-6436
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6436
Project: Hadoop YARN
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6406?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15951542#comment-15951542
]
Jason Lowe commented on YARN-6406:
--
Yep, the refcount was only added because of the possib
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2113?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15951538#comment-15951538
]
Jason Lowe commented on YARN-2113:
--
The answer is no to both questions. Both users are be
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2113?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15951445#comment-15951445
]
Jason Lowe commented on YARN-2113:
--
bq. once user submit app3 with highest priority, it sh
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6403?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15951182#comment-15951182
]
Jason Lowe commented on YARN-6403:
--
Thanks for updating the patch!
bq. TestApplicationCli
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6411?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15951087#comment-15951087
]
Jason Lowe commented on YARN-6411:
--
+1 lgtm. Committing this.
> Clean up the overwrite o
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6354?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15949637#comment-15949637
]
Jason Lowe commented on YARN-6354:
--
The TestRMRestart failure is unrelated.
> LeveldbRMSt
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6411?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15949230#comment-15949230
]
Jason Lowe commented on YARN-6411:
--
Thanks for the patch! Looks good overall. It would b
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6403?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jason Lowe reassigned YARN-6403:
Assignee: Tao Yang
Target Version/s: 2.8.1
Submitting patch so Jenkins can comment on it
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6354?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jason Lowe updated YARN-6354:
-
Attachment: YARN-6354.001.patch
Patch that adds a termination check for the reservation key traversal loop
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6354?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jason Lowe reassigned YARN-6354:
Assignee: Jason Lowe
> LeveldbRMStateStore can parse invalid keys when recovering reservations
> ---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6195?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15947730#comment-15947730
]
Jason Lowe commented on YARN-6195:
--
Latest patch lgtm, with the caveat that I don't think
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6401?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15947656#comment-15947656
]
Jason Lowe commented on YARN-6401:
--
Ah, sorry. I was thinking it was ignoring SIGTERM and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6168?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15947326#comment-15947326
]
Jason Lowe commented on YARN-6168:
--
This sounds like the RM isn't waiting long enough for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6403?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15947283#comment-15947283
]
Jason Lowe commented on YARN-6403:
--
Sorry, I completely missed the server-side change in C
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6403?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15947251#comment-15947251
]
Jason Lowe commented on YARN-6403:
--
Thanks for the patch!
This patch is changing the clie
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6406?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15946028#comment-15946028
]
Jason Lowe commented on YARN-6406:
--
I haven't dug into YARN-6040, but in general I'm a big
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6403?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15945116#comment-15945116
]
Jason Lowe commented on YARN-6403:
--
The NM should definitely be hardened against malformed
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6359?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15944122#comment-15944122
]
Jason Lowe commented on YARN-6359:
--
+1 lgtm. Will commit this tomorrow if there are no ob
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2113?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15944117#comment-15944117
]
Jason Lowe commented on YARN-2113:
--
I agree with Eric here. I see priority as a way for a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6401?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15943307#comment-15943307
]
Jason Lowe commented on YARN-6401:
--
Is this something YARN needs to support directly? Thi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6217?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15930513#comment-15930513
]
Jason Lowe commented on YARN-6217:
--
+1 lgtm. Committing this.
> TestLocalCacheDirectoryM
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6359?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15930358#comment-15930358
]
Jason Lowe commented on YARN-6359:
--
Thanks for the report and patch!
The timeout in the l
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6217?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15930346#comment-15930346
]
Jason Lowe commented on YARN-6217:
--
I tend to agree. Originally there was an edict to put
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6315?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15930205#comment-15930205
]
Jason Lowe commented on YARN-6315:
--
I tried to run this in an end-to-end test and found it
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6354?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jason Lowe updated YARN-6354:
-
Priority: Major (was: Critical)
Summary: LeveldbRMStateStore can parse invalid keys when recovering
r
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6354?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15928843#comment-15928843
]
Jason Lowe commented on YARN-6354:
--
Sample stacktrace:
{noformat}
2017-03-16 15:17:26,616
Jason Lowe created YARN-6354:
Summary: RM fails to upgrade to 2.8 with leveldb state store
Key: YARN-6354
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6354
Project: Hadoop YARN
Issue Type: Bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6315?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15928292#comment-15928292
]
Jason Lowe commented on YARN-6315:
--
Thanks for updating the patch!
Catching Exception is
Jason Lowe created YARN-6349:
Summary: Container kill request from AM can be lost if container
is still recovering
Key: YARN-6349
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6349
Project: Hadoop YARN
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6349?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15928185#comment-15928185
]
Jason Lowe commented on YARN-6349:
--
See YARN-4051 for related discussion.
> Container kil
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4051?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15928139#comment-15928139
]
Jason Lowe commented on YARN-4051:
--
+1 for the branch-2 patch as well. The unit test fail
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4051?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15926276#comment-15926276
]
Jason Lowe commented on YARN-4051:
--
+1 for the latest patch, however it doesn't apply to b
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6315?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15925152#comment-15925152
]
Jason Lowe commented on YARN-6315:
--
Thanks for the patch! Looks good overall, just some m
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6325?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15924952#comment-15924952
]
Jason Lowe commented on YARN-6325:
--
I don't have the full backstory on queue name requirem
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-3884?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15924637#comment-15924637
]
Jason Lowe commented on YARN-3884:
--
If only nodemanagers are reporting then allocations th
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4051?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jason Lowe updated YARN-4051:
-
Summary: ContainerKillEvent lost when container is still recovering and
application finishes (was: Contain
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6195?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15922687#comment-15922687
]
Jason Lowe commented on YARN-6195:
--
Pinging [~leftnoteasy] and [~sunilg] to see if there's
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6195?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15907541#comment-15907541
]
Jason Lowe commented on YARN-6195:
--
Thanks for updating the patch!
I discovered the queue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6321?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15905561#comment-15905561
]
Jason Lowe commented on YARN-6321:
--
+1 lgtm. Committing this.
> TestResources test timeo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6310?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15905407#comment-15905407
]
Jason Lowe commented on YARN-6310:
--
+1 lgtm. Committing this.
> OutputStreams in Aggrega
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6321?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15905372#comment-15905372
]
Jason Lowe commented on YARN-6321:
--
Sample stacktrace from a timeout:
{noformat}
java.lang
Jason Lowe created YARN-6321:
Summary: TestResources test timeouts are too aggressive
Key: YARN-6321
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6321
Project: Hadoop YARN
Issue Type: Bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6195?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15905293#comment-15905293
]
Jason Lowe commented on YARN-6195:
--
What really needs to happen is a metrics-per-partition
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6165?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15902110#comment-15902110
]
Jason Lowe commented on YARN-6165:
--
+1 lgtm. The TestRMRestart failure is unrelated and w
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6165?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15901915#comment-15901915
]
Jason Lowe commented on YARN-6165:
--
I'd like to take a quick look, and this needs a Jenkin
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4236?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15901600#comment-15901600
]
Jason Lowe commented on YARN-4236:
--
Oops spoke too soon. Just before committing I noticed
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4236?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15901575#comment-15901575
]
Jason Lowe commented on YARN-4236:
--
+1 lgtm. Committing this.
> Metric for aggregated re
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4051?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15901553#comment-15901553
]
Jason Lowe commented on YARN-4051:
--
Thanks for updating the patch! In the future, please
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6292?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15898091#comment-15898091
]
Jason Lowe commented on YARN-6292:
--
What version is involved here? Is this a duplicate of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6195?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15898083#comment-15898083
]
Jason Lowe commented on YARN-6195:
--
Thanks for the patch, [~benson.qiu]!
I'm confused abo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6276?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15897373#comment-15897373
]
Jason Lowe commented on YARN-6276:
--
Processes escaping from the session is a known problem
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6274?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jason Lowe updated YARN-6274:
-
Summary: Documentation refers to incorrect nodemanager health checker
interval property (was: One error in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6274?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jason Lowe updated YARN-6274:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.7.3)
Thanks for the report, [~rebeyond1218] and for the patch, [~cheersyang]!
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6276?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15894382#comment-15894382
]
Jason Lowe commented on YARN-6276:
--
When the nodemanager kills a container it first sends
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6263?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15892647#comment-15892647
]
Jason Lowe commented on YARN-6263:
--
+1 lgtm. The unit test failures do not appear to be r
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-3884?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15879197#comment-15879197
]
Jason Lowe commented on YARN-3884:
--
+1 for only publishing metrics for "real" containers t
Jason Lowe created YARN-6217:
Summary: TestLocalCacheDirectoryManager test timeout is too
aggressive
Key: YARN-6217
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6217
Project: Hadoop YARN
Issu
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6214?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15878482#comment-15878482
]
Jason Lowe commented on YARN-6214:
--
It's a little difficult to line up the source with tha
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6191?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15870131#comment-15870131
]
Jason Lowe commented on YARN-6191:
--
Thanks, Chris! Having the AM react to the preemption
901 - 1000 of 2812 matches
Mail list logo