Dne Wednesday 02 of April 2008 23:31:48 Duncan Mac-Vicar P. napsal(a):
Talking seriously. The only change I would support is to get rid of the 2.
Hmm, when talking about the configuration tool, we usually call it only YaST
even now. However, I really like the possibility to specify whether I
Hello,
On Apr 3 08:09 Jiri Srain wrote (shortened):
... I really like the possibility to specify whether I want a
graphical or text-mode interface just by distinguishing
between 'yast2 foo' and 'yast foo'.
I think it is independent of the brand name of the thingy
how many symbolic links
Klaus Kaempf napsal(a):
* Lukas Ocilka [EMAIL PROTECTED] [Apr 01. 2008 18:29]:
The change could be trivial 'YaST' - 'YAST' (because it is an
abbreviation).
We could compare the proposed change to 'SuSE' - 'SUSE' (currently
'openSUSE', of course).
Following good example, I'd propose to
On Wed, Apr 02, 2008 at 02:15:17PM +0200, Lukas Ocilka wrote:
Hmm, well, I just wanted to know opinions on the newly proposed name.
There are a lot of reasons to rename it but I wanted to hear also
opinions why not to do so. For instance:
If we rename it to openYAST but don't change anything
On Wednesday 02 April 2008 14:24, Arvin Schnell wrote:
On Wed, Apr 02, 2008 at 02:15:17PM +0200, Lukas Ocilka wrote:
Hmm, well, I just wanted to know opinions on the newly proposed name.
There are a lot of reasons to rename it but I wanted to hear also
opinions why not to do so. For
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Lukas Ocilka wrote:
Yes, this was an expected reply. Is Klaus the only one who *has* an
opinion on that?
LOL, I guess not all people to follow such discussions week away from a
product release, exactly when those changes can't be done and espacialy
