[yocto] [meta-selinux][PATCH 1/2] audit: pkg now in meta-oe

2021-05-13 Thread Armin Kuster
Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster --- .../Fixed-swig-host-contamination-issue.patch | 57 --- .../audit/audit/audit-volatile.conf | 1 - recipes-security/audit/audit/auditd | 153 -- recipes-security/audit/audit/auditd.service | 28

[yocto] [meta-selinux][PATCH 2/2] MAINTAINERS: update email address

2021-05-13 Thread Armin Kuster
Include example send-email Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster --- MAINTAINERS | 9 - 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS index 36c451f..0dc492e 100644 --- a/MAINTAINERS +++ b/MAINTAINERS @@ -1,7 +1,14 @@ This file contains a list of

Re: [yocto] meta-selinux issues. Depending on what I put in my local.conf, I get boot loops or can't log in.

2021-05-13 Thread Yi Zhao
On 5/14/21 9:40 AM, Brian Hutchinson wrote: Hi, Pretty new to selinux.  I've worked through a lot of issues to get this far but am stumped at the moment so any pointers, clues are appreciated. I'm trying to add selinux to my custom image.  After running into problems, I decided it was

Re: [linux-yocto] [PATCH 0/1] fs: dcache: avoid livelocks on d_alloc_parallel

2021-05-13 Thread wenlin.k...@windriver.com
On 2021/5/11 下午12:59, wenlin.k...@windriver.com wrote: On 2021/5/11 上午11:24, Bruce Ashfield wrote: [Please note: This e-mail is from an EXTERNAL e-mail address] In message: Re: [PATCH 0/1] fs: dcache: avoid livelocks on d_alloc_parallel on 11/05/2021 Wenlin Kang wrote: On 2021/5/11

Re: [linux-yocto] [linux-yocto v5.10] [PATCH] tracing/arm: Have max stack tracer handle the case of return address after data

2021-05-13 Thread Bruce Ashfield
merged. Bruce In message: [linux-yocto] [linux-yocto v5.10] [PATCH] tracing/arm: Have max stack tracer handle the case of return address after data on 13/05/2021 qiang.zh...@windriver.com wrote: > From: Zqiang > > This change is similar to the following patch, > it also suitable for arm. >

Re: [PATCH][linux-yocto][linux-yocto v5.10/standard/sdkv5.4/xlnx-soc][linux-yocto-dev standard/xlnx-soc] mtd: spi-nor: Don't parse 4BAIT via Zynq QSPI

2021-05-13 Thread Bruce Ashfield
Someting is up with the recent linux-yocto-dev patches. Patch 1 applied to 5.10, but not linux-yocto-dev (5.12.2), patch 2 was fine on both. I resolved a the conflct for patch 1 on linux-yocto-dev and pushed it, but double check and re-submit anything missing or fixes. Bruce In message:

Re: [linux-yocto][linux-yocto v5.10] kernel code for marvell cn96xx

2021-05-13 Thread Bruce Ashfield
In message: [linux-yocto][linux-yocto v5.10] kernel code for marvell cn96xx on 13/05/2021 Ruiqiang Hao wrote: > Hi Bruce, > > Please help to merge this patch into our linux-yocto repo. > > repo: > linux-yocto > branch: > v5.10/standard/base >From the lkml

[linux-yocto] [PATCH][linux-yocto-dev standard/xlnx-soc] arm: fix IPI_CPU_BACKTRACE wrong number and handler missing issue

2021-05-13 Thread quanyang.wang
From: Quanyang Wang IPI_CPU_BACKTRACE should be 7 not 8 and the handler for IPI_CPU_BACKTRACE was dropped when I porting SDK patches. Let's add it back to fix the issue when echo "l" to /proc/sysrq-trigger failed. Signed-off-by: Quanyang Wang --- arch/arm/kernel/smp.c | 18 ++

Re: [PATCH][linux-yocto][linux-yocto v5.10/standard/sdkv5.4/xlnx-soc][linux-yocto-dev standard/xlnx-soc] arm: fix IPI_CPU_BACKTRACE wrong number and handler missing issue

2021-05-13 Thread quanyang.wang
Hi Bruce, On 5/14/21 10:38 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: merged to 5.10, but this doesn't apply to linux-yocto-dev (5.12.2). There is a little context difference. I will send a new patch for linux-yocto-dev soon. Sorry for any confusion caused. Thanks, Quanyang Bruce In message:

Re: [PATCH][linux-yocto][linux-yocto v5.10/standard/sdkv5.4/xlnx-soc][linux-yocto-dev standard/xlnx-soc] arm: fix IPI_CPU_BACKTRACE wrong number and handler missing issue

2021-05-13 Thread Bruce Ashfield
merged to 5.10, but this doesn't apply to linux-yocto-dev (5.12.2). Bruce In message: [PATCH][linux-yocto][linux-yocto v5.10/standard/sdkv5.4/xlnx-soc][linux-yocto-dev standard/xlnx-soc] arm: fix IPI_CPU_BACKTRACE wrong number and handler missing issue on 12/05/2021 quanyang.wang wrote: >

[yocto] Layer list's certificate expired

2021-05-13 Thread Andreas Müller
Hi, On opening OE-layers browsers complain that certificate has expired yesterday 13.th of May. Just wanted to let you know. Cheers, Andreas -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#53512):

[yocto] Yocto Technical Team Minutes, Engineering Sync, for May 11, 2021

2021-05-13 Thread Trevor Woerner
Yocto Technical Team Minutes, Engineering Sync, for May 11, 2021 archive: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ly8nyhO14kDNnFcW2QskANXW3ZT7QwKC5wWVDg9dDH4/edit == announcements == The upcoming Yocto Project Summit is taking place May 25-26 2021 details:

Re: [yocto] Yocto with xtensa

2021-05-13 Thread Khem Raj
On 5/12/21 11:45 PM, Jack Daniels wrote: Hello Khem, Thank you for the information. Is it about adding support for the xtensa build system (toolchain)? Is it work for heterogeneous SoC (CPU/ARM + DSP/xtensa) as well? I can think of few ways build your Xtensa firmware outside yocto and

Re: [yocto] [meta-zephyr][PATCH 1/1] zephyr-qemuboot.bbclass: Fix runqemu dependency on qemu native sysroot

2021-05-13 Thread Andrei Gherzan
Hi Ross, On Thu, 13 May 2021, at 13:37, Andrei Gherzan wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, 13 May 2021, at 13:14, Ross Burton wrote: > > Debugged, the patch is broken. > > > > Using a little tool I have: > > > > Task qemu-system-native-5.2.0-r0:do_addto_recipe_sysroot failed > > Active tasks are: > >

[yocto] [meta-zephyr][PATCH 2/2] zephyr-qemuboot.bbclass: Remove dependency on qemu-system-native

2021-05-13 Thread Andrei Gherzan
From: Andrei Gherzan runqemu only really needs the sysroot for qemu-helper-native. Pulling other qemu dependency would get into a racing issue with rm_work. That can also be fixed by tweaking the do_addto_recipe_sysroot order in oe-core for qemu-system-native but that is just not needed for this

[yocto] [meta-zephyr][PATCH 1/2] zephyr-qemuboot.bbclass: Don't overwrite the entire elf dictionary key

2021-05-13 Thread Andrei Gherzan
From: Andrei Gherzan The nios2_machdata_setfunc was overwriting the elf key in matchdata for arc done in arc_machdata_setfunc which in turn was overwriting the one from oe-core. This is making qemu-x86 builds (as an example) unbuildable: Exception: KeyError: 'i586' This patch makes sure that

Re: [yocto] [meta-zephyr][PATCH 1/1] zephyr-qemuboot.bbclass: Fix runqemu dependency on qemu native sysroot

2021-05-13 Thread Andrei Gherzan
Hi, On Thu, 13 May 2021, at 13:14, Ross Burton wrote: > Debugged, the patch is broken. > > Using a little tool I have: > > Task qemu-system-native-5.2.0-r0:do_addto_recipe_sysroot failed > Active tasks are: > virglrenderer-native-0.9.1-r0:do_rm_work > binutils-cross-arm-2.36.1-r0:do_patch >

Re: [yocto] [meta-zephyr][PATCH 1/1] zephyr-qemuboot.bbclass: Fix runqemu dependency on qemu native sysroot

2021-05-13 Thread Ross Burton
Debugged, the patch is broken. Using a little tool I have: Task qemu-system-native-5.2.0-r0:do_addto_recipe_sysroot failed Active tasks are: virglrenderer-native-0.9.1-r0:do_rm_work binutils-cross-arm-2.36.1-r0:do_patch qemu-system-native-5.2.0-r0:do_addto_recipe_sysroot

Re: [yocto] [meta-zephyr][PATCH 1/1] zephyr-qemuboot.bbclass: Fix runqemu dependency on qemu native sysroot

2021-05-13 Thread Ross Burton
This is breaking our CI: ERROR: qemu-system-native-5.2.0-r0 do_addto_recipe_sysroot: Error executing a python function in exec_python_func() autogenerated: The stack trace of python calls that resulted in this exception/failure was: File: 'exec_python_func() autogenerated', lineno: 2, function:

Re: [yocto] Yocto with xtensa

2021-05-13 Thread Jack Daniels
Hello Khem, Thank you for the information. Is it about adding support for the xtensa build system (toolchain)? Is it work for heterogeneous SoC (CPU/ARM + DSP/xtensa) as well? Thank you. BR/J On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 1:07 AM Khem Raj wrote: > Hello Jack, > > I think we do not have support for

Re: [yocto] Yocto Zeus : facing error regarding hostapd #zeus

2021-05-13 Thread Zoran
Hello Rohit, It is a good find. I also googled for the error, and found this as an explanation: https://www.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/yocto/2019-February/044153.html I included Alex (Kanavin), who created the above mail. Maybe Alex can give more light on the problem? In the meantime, you

Re: [yocto] Yocto Zeus : facing error regarding hostapd #zeus

2021-05-13 Thread rohit jadhav
Hi Zoran, log.do_rootfs.31340is linked to log.do_rootfs I have checked with ls command, So both files are identical. While surfing I found similar thread but its for different package its as follows : https://github.com/Xilinx/meta-virtualization/issues/4 Can you please help out with this

Re: [yocto] [meta-raspberrypi][PATCH] 99-com.rules: fix error invalid substitution type

2021-05-13 Thread Changqing Li
On 5/13/21 11:48 AM, Khem Raj wrote: [Please note: This e-mail is from an EXTERNAL e-mail address] On 5/12/21 8:42 PM, Changqing Li wrote: From: Changqing Li fix below error: /etc/udev/rules.d/99-com.rules:10 Invalid value "/bin/sh -c 'ALIASES=/proc/device-tree/aliases; if cmp -s