[yocto] [meta-zephyr][PATCH] layer.conf: update LAYERSERIES_COMPAT to use nanbield

Drop langdale and mickledore. Signed-off-by: Naveen Saini --- meta-zephyr-bsp/conf/layer.conf | 2 +- meta-zephyr-core/conf/layer.conf | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/meta-zephyr-bsp/conf/layer.conf b/meta-zephyr-bsp/conf/layer.conf index d809926..1edcb0b

[yocto] M+ & H bugs with Milestone Movements WW36

All, YP M+ or high bugs which moved to a new milestone in WW36 are listed below: Priority Bug ID Short Description Changer Owner Was Became High 14901 lttng: collect TAP output randy.macl...@windriver.com alexis.loth...@bootlin.com 4.3 M4

[yocto] Enhancements/Bugs closed WW36!

All, The below were the owners of enhancements or bugs closed during the last week! Who Count ross.bur...@arm.com 1 richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org 1 randy.macl...@windriver.com 1 Grand Total 3 Thanks, *Stephen K. Jolley* *Yocto Project Program Manager* (*Cell*:(208)

[yocto] Current high bug count owners for Yocto Project 4.3

All, Below is the list of top 28 bug owners as of the end of WW36 who have open medium or higher bugs and enhancements against YP 4.3. There are 33 possible work days left until the final release candidates for YP 4.3 needs to be released. Who Count michael.opdenac...@bootlin.com 34

[yocto] Yocto Project Newcomer & Unassigned Bugs - Help Needed

All, The triage team is starting to try and collect up and classify bugs which a newcomer to the project would be able to work on in a way which means people can find them. They're being listed on the triage page under the appropriate heading:

Re: [yocto] [meta-virtualization] nerdctl broken in kirkstone

On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 3:50 PM Marek Belisko wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 9:27 PM Marek Belisko via lists.yoctoproject.org > wrote: >> >> On Mon, Aug 28, 2023 at 10:38 PM Belisko Marek >> wrote: >>> >>> On Thu, Aug 24, 2023 at 4:05 PM Khem Raj wrote: does it work if you add

Re: [yocto] [meta-virtualization] nerdctl broken in kirkstone

On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 9:27 PM Marek Belisko via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote: > On Mon, Aug 28, 2023 at 10:38 PM Belisko Marek > wrote: > >> On Thu, Aug 24, 2023 at 4:05 PM Khem Raj wrote: >> >>> does it work if you add do_compile[network] = "1" >>> >> Nope it is not. It turns out that the

Re: [yocto] [meta-virtualization] nerdctl broken in kirkstone

On Mon, Aug 28, 2023 at 10:38 PM Belisko Marek wrote: > On Thu, Aug 24, 2023 at 4:05 PM Khem Raj wrote: > >> does it work if you add do_compile[network] = "1" >> > Nope it is not. It turns out that the fetch phase is not correct. When I > do bitbake nerdctl -e | grep SRC_URI I got only: > >

[yocto] kernel panic error after enabling dm-verity.

I have two yocto recipes. base image and advanced image. base image have support for dm-verity. i just have to include one line in local.conf to enable dm-verity with initramfs support. *DISTRO_FEATURES_append += "dm-verity" (creating wic image only)* * * and image gets loaded successfully as

Re: [yocto] Question: Sharing SSTATE_DIR and DL_DIR through Lustre/NFS for team work

On Mon, 11 Sept 2023 at 10:13, ChenQi wrote: > This is the case I referred to as 'different builds owned/controlled by > the same user'. 'User' is ambiguous here - user as a person, or user as a local unix user account? In the latter case this is likely to be misunderstood as 'sstate cache must

Re: [yocto] Question: Sharing SSTATE_DIR and DL_DIR through Lustre/NFS for team work

On 9/11/23 15:36, Alexander Kanavin wrote: On Mon, 11 Sept 2023 at 06:22, Chen Qi via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote: SSTATE_DIR and DL_DIR are writable. Sharing them among different builds owned/controlled by the same user is OK, but sharing these writable directories among different users

Re: [yocto] Question: Sharing SSTATE_DIR and DL_DIR through Lustre/NFS for team work

Hi all, On 9/11/23 09:36, Alexander Kanavin via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote: On Mon, 11 Sept 2023 at 06:22, Chen Qi via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote: SSTATE_DIR and DL_DIR are writable. Sharing them among different builds owned/controlled by the same user is OK, but sharing these writable

Re: [yocto] Question: Sharing SSTATE_DIR and DL_DIR through Lustre/NFS for team work

On 11 Sep 2023, at 05:22, Chen Qi via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote: > > SSTATE_DIR and DL_DIR are writable. Sharing them among different builds > owned/controlled by the same user is OK, but sharing these writable > directories among different users does not seem to be a good idea. > You

Re: [yocto] How to add a hook or handler for specified task?

I found a solution that works. If there are other more suitable solutions, please let me know, thank you. Everyone is welcome to discuss. I use the bb.build.TaskFailed event, although it's global, not specific to a recipe. In the handler body, I use e.getTask() to determine whether the

Re: [yocto] Question: Sharing SSTATE_DIR and DL_DIR through Lustre/NFS for team work

On Mon, 11 Sept 2023 at 06:22, Chen Qi via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote: > SSTATE_DIR and DL_DIR are writable. Sharing them among different builds > owned/controlled by the same user is OK, but sharing these writable > directories among different users does not seem to be a good idea. > You