[yocto] [layerindex-web][PATCH] utils.py: get dependent layers at same branch

For both meta-poky/meta-yocto and meta-xilinx/meta-xilinx-core we have a situation where the "collections" stayed the same ("yocto" and "xilinx" respectively) but the layer/layerbranch changed. Without the "branch" argument to get_dependency_layers, we were always defaulting to the older layer

Re: [yocto] bitbake error about files/directories installed but not shipped

Hi Martin, I would guess that libdir in your build is set to /usr/lib while omx-user-module created /usr/lib64. Check with bitbake-getvar and the files in ${D}, possibly need to pass libdir value to whatever build system omx-user-module uses (hard to guess without seeing the whole recipe or

[yocto] [layerindex-web][PATCH] update_layer.py: checkout dep layers as well

We have never been checking out dependent layers at the same release/branch. With the introduction of 'addpylib', this became obvious due to parsing errors. Ensure that known LayerDependency objects are checked out at the expected branch/release. Since openembedded-core has already been handled

Re: [yocto] bitbake error about files/directories installed but not shipped

I would guess that libdir in your build is set to /usr/lib while omx-user-module created /usr/lib64. Check with bitbake-getvar and the files in ${D}, possibly need to pass libdir value to whatever build system omx-user-module uses (hard to guess without seeing the whole recipe or sources). On

[yocto] bitbake error about files/directories installed but not shipped

Hi, I'm struggling with a Yocto build for my board, I get an error like: ``` ERROR: omx-user-module-1.1.0-r0 do_package: QA Issue: omx-user-module: Files/directories were installed but not shipped in any package:   /usr/lib64 Please set FILES such that these items are packaged. Alternatively

Re: [yocto] [ANNOUNCEMENT] Yocto Project 4.3 is Released

On Fri, 2023-11-10 at 15:57 +0100, Michael Opdenacker via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote: > Hi Lee > > On 09.11.23 at 16:29, Lee Chee Yang wrote: > > > > Hi > > > > We are pleased to announce the Yocto Project 4.3 Release is now > > available for download. > > > > > >

[yocto] [RFC] devtool: support multiple sources

Hi all, Sorry for the long message here, but I would really appreciate feedback from the community :) I am currently working on bug #14141 (https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14141). The main goal of this bug is to correctly support git submodules with devtool. I currently have

Re: [yocto] [ANNOUNCEMENT] Yocto Project 4.3 is Released

Hi Lee On 09.11.23 at 16:29, Lee Chee Yang wrote: Hi We are pleased to announce the Yocto Project 4.3 Release is now available for download. https://downloads.yoctoproject.org/releases/yocto/yocto-4.3/poky-15b576c4101231d248fda7ae0824e1780e1a8901.tar.bz2

Re: [linux-yocto] [V2-revised] Microchip polarfire SoC - yocto-kernel-cache & linux-yocto V2 patch.

Hi Bruce, Please find below the yocto-kernel-cache patch. Request you to merge this patch in yocto-kernel-cache yocto-6.1 branch.

Re: [linux-yocto] [V2-revised] Microchip polarfire SoC - yocto-kernel-cache & linux-yocto V2 patch.

On Fri, Nov 10, 2023 at 12:21:49PM +, Kadambathur Subramaniyam, Saravanan wrote: > //Changed subject line > Hi Bruce > We closed all the internal review comments which Kexin mentioned in his below > email. He approved the updated patch. Hi Saravanan, For the kernel cache change, since